Search results

On my screen, and with my eyesight being what it is, in the image, "cave" looks almost like "cove". If that is a treasure map, it might make sense for no cove to appear, since treasure maps have to do with DIS-COVE-ry.🙃

Looks very interesting! I just downloaded it, and am looking forward to listening to it. I've heard Dr. Bergman before, and was very impressed. I've got a couple of his books, which I need to try to get around to reading! As this audio looks to be a Part II, is there any chance you might be able...

Obviously you don't welcome the question I asked you about your mindless, meaningless raving.

In other words, @JudgeRightly,

@theMadThinker wrote: So, I asked him/her: @theMadThinker: <NO ANSWER> By your cognitively meaningless use of your extra-Biblical phrase "had a God", you have cornered yourself into being incapable of answering the question I asked you about your raving. Apparently you imagined that the next...

What do you mean by your extra-Biblical phrase, "had a God"? Obviously, since the Bible does not say your phrase "has a God", the Bible does not mean anything by your phrase "has a God". And so, it would be madness to say "What does the Bible mean by @theMadThinker's phrase, 'had a God'?" Thus...

She couldn't be much worse at reading and writing than you've shown yourself to be.

@Avajs: <NO ANSWER> 🤣 Did you ever hear her play Handel on niolin? Please provide evidence for your claim that I have claimed that Darwinists have been on earth for 4.5 billion years, you illiterate retard. You should stop letting her write your posts for you.

If it were mock-worthy (and it isn't) to claim Earth's human population went from 0 to 1 in an instant, then it seems that to claim Earth's human population went from 0 to 10,000 in an instant would be at least 10,000x more mock-worthy.

Is a population individuals? Yes or No? If by your word "populations" you are referring to individuals, then this is what you've handed us in your display of self-defeat: If by your word "populations" you are not referring to individuals, then to what (if anything) are you referring by it?

A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man!

What do you mean by "enliven and sustain the universe"?

@TheDarkSideOfTheMoon: <NO ANSWER> @TheDarkSideOfTheMoon: <NO ANSWER> @TheDarkSideOfTheMoon: <NO ANSWER>

I have no scruple against calling him "Dr.", nor any reason, motivation, or desire to slight his academic attainments and work. But why insist on calling him "Mr. Brown", since, clearly, he is white, not brown?

Ah, you were so eager to print a period this time that in your rush to do so you forgot to actually finish writing your sentence before doing so. "...that which is _________"? That which is what? That which is unholy, unrighteous, unjust, evil, murderous, monstrous, etc.? Is it God's will...

What a peculiarly inopportune place to have neglected to punctuate with a period. Was "abortion" meant to be the last word of your sentence, or did you just leave off writing, there, in the middle of a longer sentence? Kind of looks wide-open for a continuation, like "...except in cases of X, Y...

LOL Thanks for your non-answer, Professor Evolutiondidit! Q. What is Earth's all-time lowest, non-zero human population number? Have fun with your inability and failure to respond rationally to this question! And, while you are failing to answer it, you might enjoy bearing in mind the facts...

You don't even know what defining is.

In other words, taxonomy is saying things -- affirming propositions (whether true propositions or false propositions). 'Cause that's what you're doing if you're classifying: you're affirming that "A is a B", "X is not a Y", "Dogs have four legs", etc. If you're not affirming one or more...