How To Get To Heaven When You Die

xfrodobagginsx

Active member
Saying it doesn't make it so, Frodo! Saying it very simply doesn't make it so.

So very disappointing. :(


I don't care what you think. What you think is precisely the problem. It certainly isn't what determines correct doctrine!


This is how big a deal this issue is...

If your reading of these passages is correct then the bible is false - by its own standard.
If the bible is false, Jesus is not who He claimed to be.
If Jesus is not who He claimed to be then Christianity is false and we are all here wasting our time.

Ideas matter, Frodo! They have real consequences. If the bible contradicts itself then we are all fools.


How is it that you say you want good bible teaching out of one side of your mouth but out of the other reject purely logical arguments out of hand as if nothing of any substance was said at all? If someone's disagreement with your doctrine is all it takes for you to close your mind to anything they might say, then why do you care who is or isn't a good bible teacher? It means that your definition of "good bible teacher" is "Whoever comes closest to teaching the stuff I already believe."


"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself—and you are the easiest person to fool." Richard Feynman

Though originally said in a scientific context, this principle has profound theological relevance. After all, getting our doctrine right is at least as important as any scientific endeavor and spiritual truth is not just a matter of intellect, it’s a matter of the heart, which the scripture warns, is deceitful above all things.

We all have a tendency to see what we expect to see, to hold fast to what we’ve long believed, especially when those beliefs feel settled or familiar because everyone around us believes them. But as Feynman put it, we must bend over backward not to fool ourselves. That means we must approach our understanding of God, of Scripture, and of doctrine with humility. Not the kind that weakens conviction, but the kind that keeps us open to correction.

Loving the truth means being willing to ask...
“Is what I believe actually what the text says, or have I possibly imported something into it without realizing it?”
That question isn't an accusation, it’s a safeguard. It protects us from replacing faithfulness with familiarity.

The call here is not to doubt everything, but to examine everything, to hold fast that which is good (I Thessalonians 5:21). That’s the heart of spiritual integrity: not just believing what is true, but being willing to search for it with the courage to admit if we’ve missed something along the way.

There is no such thing as a GOOD scientist or theologian who doesn't have this mentality, nor any good bible teacher who doesn't exemplify and teach it to his students. I know with certainty that Bob did so, did Les?

Ultimately, whether Les Feldick was a better or worse bible teacher than Bob Enyart comes down to who's doctrine turns out to have been more correct. Time will tell.

And as for you and I, of the two of us, which is more likely to be fooling themselves; the one that makes actual arguments and gives OBJECTIVE reasons for their doctrine or the one who blindly accepts proof-texting as actual proof and blows off anything anyone says to the contrary for no reason other than that they disagree with the conclusion?
What's very disappointing is that the Bible plainly says that Jesus Christ created all things, holds all things together and knows all things, yet you don't believe the Word of God. You can’t change it. Just like when I debate the Calvinists and I show them the verse thar says God desires all men to be saved. They try to change the meaning of the word all. That's exactly what you are doing. It's sad and cult like.
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
What's very disappointing is that the Bible plainly says that Jesus Christ created all things, holds all things together and knows all things, yet you don't believe the Word of God. You can’t change it. Just like when I debate the Calvinists and I show them the verse thar says God desires all men to be saved. They try to change the meaning of the word all. That's exactly what you are doing. It's sad and cult like.

The word all. All also figures prominently in the dispute about whether Mary was (by grace alone) sinless. They say, "No! 'ALL have fallen short!'" When you point out

$$ Ge 6:9
These [are] the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man [and] perfect in his generations, [and] Noah walked with God.

$$ Job 1:1
There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name [was] Job; and that man was perfect and upright, and one that feared God, and eschewed evil.

... they STILL say no. Because they're ENTRENCHED (that's a very good word to use), along with enchanted and enthralled, by their opinion.
 

Right Divider

Body part
What's very disappointing is that the Bible plainly says that Jesus Christ created all things, holds all things together and knows all things, yet you don't believe the Word of God.
Yes, we do believe the Word of God... we don't believe YOUR interpretation of the Word of God.
You can’t change it.
We don't. Stop with the false accusations.
Just like when I debate the Calvinists and I show them the verse thar says God desires all men to be saved.
So... is it your claim that the Bible NEVER uses a generalization?
They try to change the meaning of the word all.
So do you, when you claim that the Bible NEVER uses 'all' as a generalization.

Try this one on for size:
Rom 3:23 (AKJV/PCE)​
(3:23) For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;​

Is Jesus Christ excluded from the "all" there?

YES, that is a GENERALIZATION that is NOT "all inclusive"!
That's exactly what you are doing. It's sad and cult like.
You've made "a cult of Les Feldick".
 

xfrodobagginsx

Active member
The word all. All also figures prominently in the dispute about whether Mary was (by grace alone) sinless. They say, "No! 'ALL have fallen short!'" When you point out

$$ Ge 6:9
These [are] the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man [and] perfect in his generations, [and] Noah walked with God.

$$ Job 1:1
There was a man in the land of Uz, whose name [was] Job; and that man was perfect and upright, and one that feared God, and eschewed evil.

... they STILL say no. Because they're ENTRENCHED (that's a very good word to use), along with enchanted and enthralled, by their opinion.
I am not sure what your point is here. Of course Mary is a sinner and yes I'll have fallen short.
 

xfrodobagginsx

Active member
Yes, we do believe the Word of God... we don't believe YOUR interpretation of the Word of God.

We don't. Stop with the false accusations.

So... is it your claim that the Bible NEVER uses a generalization?

So do you, when you claim that the Bible NEVER uses 'all' as a generalization.

Try this one on for size:
Rom 3:23 (AKJV/PCE)​
(3:23) For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;​

Is Jesus Christ excluded from the "all" there?

YES, that is a GENERALIZATION that is NOT "all inclusive"!

You've made "a cult of Les Feldick".
You mean you don't believe the word of God's interpretation of the word of God. When the word of God says all it means all. For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. That doesn't mean that a few it means all.

I'm not making false accusations I'm basing my accusation on what you're doing. I show you the verse and you deny the verse.

I think in the instances that I showed you, it is very clear that all means all not just a few. Give me some examples of when all does not mean all. Like I said the Calvinists try to use the same argument to say that Christ did not die for all men. That is a lie.

For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. Does this include jesus? Of course it doesn't because the Bible says that Jesus was sinless. It includes all men besides jesus. This is a very weak and poor argument for you. The Bible says that Jesus died for all men that includes all men. Jesus knowing all things means that Jesus knew all things. Jesus creating all things means that Jesus created all things. Jesus holding all things together means to Jesus holds all things together.

I am a mid-acts dispensationalist but whatever you are is a perverted version of that. I stand with les feldick's teachings.

I would question you on what you believe saves a man.
 
Last edited:

Right Divider

Body part
You mean you don't believe the word of God's interpretation of the word of god.
Stop being so childish.
When the word of God says all it means all.
So... according to @xfrodobagginsx, Jesus Christ was a sinner. You need to change your ways.

Rom 3:23 (AKJV/PCE)​
(3:23) For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;​

For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. That doesn't mean that a few it means all.
So, again, you are FALSELY claiming that Jesus Christ was a sinner. Shame on YOU!
I'm not making false accusations I'm basing my accusation on what you're doing. I show you the verse and you deny the verse.
You don't listen to a single word anyone (but yourself) posts here.
I think in the instances that I showed you, it is very clear that all means all not just a few. Give me some examples of when all does not mean all.
I have! You just don't listen.
For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. Does this include jesus? Of course it doesn't because the Bible says that Jesus was sinless. It includes all men besides jesus. This is a very weak and poor argument for you. The Bible says that Jesus died for all men that includes all men. Jesus knowing all things means that Jesus knew all things. Jesus creating all things means that Jesus created all things. Jesus holding all things together means to Jesus holds all things together.
So you admit that ALL does NOT always mean ALL (as in every single one). And yet you cannot see your problem.
I am a mid-x dispensationalist but whatever you are is a perverted version of that.
False accusations will get you nowhere.
I stand with les feldick's teachings.
Yes, nothing can fix your problem.
I would question you on what you believe saves a man.
Start a new thread.
 
Last edited:

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
What's very disappointing is that the Bible plainly says that Jesus Christ created all things, holds all things together and knows all things, yet you don't believe the Word of God. You can’t change it. Just like when I debate the Calvinists and I show them the verse thar says God desires all men to be saved. They try to change the meaning of the word all. That's exactly what you are doing. It's sad and cult like.
So then I take it you aren't going to respond to substance with substance but with dismissal and close minded childishness.

So be it.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
Places where Les Feldick himself limits “all” from meaning “every single one”:
  • Romans 11:26, “And so all Israel shall be saved.” Feldick explicitly narrows “all Israel” to the believing remnant: “All Israel? Well hardly… so all of believing Israel will be saved.” lesfeldick.org
  • Romans 1:8, “your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world.” He explains that “the Roman Empire was pretty much the then-known world,” i.e., not every human everywhere. lesfeldick.org
  • Acts 19:26, “almost throughout all Asia… whom all Asia and the world worshippeth.” Feldick clarifies that “all Asia” means Asia Minor, i.e., Turkey, not literally every person. lesfeldick.org
  • 1 Corinthians 15:22–23 / “For as in Adam all die… even so in Christ shall all be made alive.”
    Feldick explains that while “all” here might sound universal, it actually refers only to all believers, not every individual without exception. He emphasizes that this applies to “all who are Christ’s” at His coming—i.e., the Body of Christ at the Rapture—not literally every person. This interpretation underscores his pattern of contextualizing “all.” YouTube+15lesfeldick.org+15

Oops!!
 
Last edited:

xfrodobagginsx

Active member
Stop being so childish.

So... according to @xfrodobagginsx, Jesus Christ was a sinner. You need to change your ways.

Rom 3:23 (AKJV/PCE)​
(3:23) For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;​


So, again, you are FALSELY claiming that Jesus Christ was a sinner. Shame on YOU!

You don't listen to a single word anyone (but yourself) posts here.

I have! You just don't listen.

So you admit that ALL does NOT always mean ALL (as in every single one). And yet you cannot see your problem.

False accusations will get you nowhere.

Yes, nothing can fix your problem.

Start a new thread.
Interesting that when I talk to you back the way that you talk to me, I am the one suddenly who is being childish. It couldn't have started with you. Naw.

Never claimed that Jesus Christ was a sinner. For all have sinned means every person who is not Christ. Very poor example on your part.

All means all. It's obvious that it's not referring to Christ from the other Scriptures.

2 Corinthians 5:21 KJV
[21] For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him.

Now show me the verses that show that all doesn't mean all things when referring to Christ knowing all things.

You remind me of those idiotic IFB jerks I grew up with. Know it all jerks who think they can bully everyone who disagrees with them.

Not gonna start a new thread. This is the only one I care about.
 

xfrodobagginsx

Active member
Places where Les Feldick himself limits “all” from meaning “every single one”:
  • Romans 11:26, “And so all Israel shall be saved.” Feldick explicitly narrows “all Israel” to the believing remnant: “All Israel? Well hardly… so all of believing Israel will be saved.” lesfeldick.org
  • Romans 1:8, “your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world.” He explains that “the Roman Empire was pretty much the then-known world,” i.e., not every human everywhere. lesfeldick.org
  • Acts 19:26, “almost throughout all Asia… whom all Asia and the world worshippeth.” Feldick clarifies that “all Asia” means Asia Minor, i.e., Turkey, not literally every person. lesfeldick.org
  • 1 Corinthians 15:22–23 / “For as in Adam all die… even so in Christ shall all be made alive.”
    Feldick explains that while “all” here might sound universal, it actually refers only to all believers, not every individual without exception. He emphasizes that this applies to “all who are Christ’s” at His coming—i.e., the Body of Christ at the Rapture—not literally every person. This interpretation underscores his pattern of contextualizing “all.” YouTube+15lesfeldick.org+15

Oops!!
All Israel WILL be saved, it's just a matter of WHEN it will happen. All Israel that survives the Tribulation period will be saved in a day when Christ reveals Himself to them you cocky jerk.

Yes their faith was spoken through the whole world, true. It's referring to the population of the world, but yes, the whole world you cocky jerk.

All Asia meaning the people that live in that area you cocky jerk. Yes all means all. It doesn't matter if that area has changed from back then. All means all.

Yes in Christ shall all.be made alive....all who believe in Christ. All means all you cocky jerk.

You obviously don't know Scripture as well as you think you do. Jesus Christ knows all things there is to know. He created all things and holds all things together. Any ounce of logic would tell a 5th grader that you can't create all things and hold all things togethwr without knowing all things. That means you are wrong. You have no verse to probe otherwise, just a cocky, know it all, pias, prideful attitude. Kind of like the Pharisees.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Never claimed that Jesus Christ was a sinner. For all have sinned means every person who is not Christ. Very poor example on your part.
It's a perfectly good example. In that case ALL did NOT mean ALL... it meant ALL BUT ONE.
All means all.
No, it doesn't... not all the time ... as you just admitted.
It's obvious that it's not referring to Christ from the other Scriptures.
Duh! That's the point that we've been making all along. You force your meaning on some verses and ignore verses that don't agree (and sometimes contradict) your belief.
Jesus Christ knows all things there is to know.
Now you're getting somewhere!

Did God know whether Abraham would be willing to sacrifice his son, Isaac?
Gen 22:11-12 (AKJV/PCE)​
(22:11) And the angel of the LORD called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he said, Here [am] I. (22:12) And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him: for now I know that thou fearest God, seeing thou hast not withheld thy son, thine only [son] from me.​
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
All Israel WILL be saved, it's just a matter of WHEN it will happen. All Israel that survives the Tribulation period will be saved in a day when Christ reveals Himself to them you cocky jerk.
Hypocrite.

You're the one that blows off arguments like nothing was said of any substance accusing me of manipulating scripture and then you come at me with this literally idiotic twisting of scripture that not even your favorite bible teacher would agree with, along with fifth grade level name calling.

Fool!

Yes their faith was spoken through the whole world, true. It's referring to the population of the world, but yes, the whole world you cocky jerk.
When you have to resort to lying to uphold your obviously false position, it's time to stop.

All Asia meaning the people that live in that area you cocky jerk.
What was said didn't even apply to every single one of them!

Yes all means all.
You know that this false! Regardless of context, "all" almost never means all (every single one). This is the case with nearly any "universal quantifier". Words like all, every, none, always, never, etc. are hyperbole in most use cases. So often, in fact, that people often feel the need to clarify things and use language that more strongly emphasizes the word when they are trying to mean "every single one". They'll add the word "literally" for example. They do that precisely because it isn't usually meant literally. It's "always" a figure of speech!

It doesn't matter if that area has changed from back then. All means all.
No one suggested that it has anything to do with whether it's changed or not.

Yes in Christ shall all.be made alive....all who believe in Christ. All means all you cocky jerk.
Saying it doesn't make it so.

You obviously don't know Scripture as well as you think you do.
Except that I'm the one making biblical arguments while you call me names and spout nothing at all but your doctrine.

Jesus Christ knows all things there is to know.
That He wants to know of that which is knowable.

Not even God can accomplish the logically absurd.

He created all things and holds all things together.
That is your doctrine. The text says something slightly different, but you don't seem to care about that.

Any ounce of logic would tell a 5th grader that you can't create all things and hold all things togethwr without knowing all things.
God knows all knowable things that He wants (or needs) to know.

That means you are wrong.
You are truly a fool. The only fifth grade mentality here it your own.

You have no verse to probe otherwise, just a cocky, know it all, pias, prideful attitude. Kind of like the Pharisees.
Except that I've already posted several that you ignore like the thread isn't still right here for the whole world to read, including all the fifth graders.
 
Last edited:

xfrodobagginsx

Active member
Hypocrite.

You're the one that blows off arguments like nothing was said of any substance accusing me of manipulating scripture and then you come at me with this literally idiotic twisting of scripture that not even your favorite bible teacher would agree with, along with fifth grade level name calling.

Fool!


When you have to resort to lying to uphold your obviously false position, it's time to stop.


What was said didn't even apply to every single one of them!


You know that this false! Regardless of context, "all" almost never means all (every single one). This is the case with nearly any "universal quantifier". Words like all, every, none, always, never, etc. are hyperbole in most use cases. So often, in fact, that people often feel the need to clarify things and use language that more strongly emphasizes the word when they are trying to mean "every single one". They'll add the word "literally" for example. They do that precisely because it isn't usually meant literally. It's "always" a figure of speech!


No one suggested that it has anything to do with whether it's changed or not.


Saying it doesn't make it so.


Except that I'm the one making biblical arguments while you call me names and spout nothing at all but your doctrine.


That He wants to know of that which is knowable.

Not even God can accomplish the logically absurd.


That is your doctrine. The text says something slightly different, but you don't seem to care about that.


God knows all knowable things that He wants (or needs) to know.


You are truly a fool. The only fifth grade mentality here it your own.


Except that I've already posted several that you ignore like the thread isn't still right here for the whole world to read, including all the fifth graders.
Matthew 5:22 KJV
[22] but I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.
 

xfrodobagginsx

Active member
I have listened to Les. He's very good.
I think that Justin Johnson is better.
Have you ever listened to Justin Johnson?
Not gonna listen to someone who tries to change the nature of God from the Biblical way of God knowing all things to some finite being who doesn't know everything, is not all-powerful...

Of God doesn't know all things, He cannot be trusted to Govern all things. But thankfully, the Bible does say that God knows all things, Created all things and holds all things together. God is all powerful and all knowing after all.

It doesn't take much Theological Knowledge or understand to get that.

Are you sure your not a Jehovah's Witness cult memeber, denying the deity of Christ in spite all all of the Biblical evidence? Do you even care about what Scripture says at all?

Oh no, all doesnt mean all anymore, it just means sometimes.

You have no valid reason to say that all doesnt mean all in Scripture. You just want the Bible to fit your false views. Why can you believe the Bible in some areas, but not others? Just curious?
 
Last edited:

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
Not gonna listen to someone who tries to change the nature of God from the Biblical way of God knowing all things to some finite being who doesn't know everything, is not all-powerful...

Of God doesn't know all things, He cannot be trusted to Govern all things. But thankfully, the Bible does say that God knows all things, Created all things and holds all things together. God is all powerful and all knowing after all.

It doesn't take much Theological Knowledge or understand to get that.
It takes plenty of biblical knowledge to get over it.

You are worshiping the god of Aristotle and Plato.

I know, you don't believe me. Your belief or lack thereof doesn't change the facts.

You are willing to believe the self-contradictory and don't seem to care about biblical arguments one way or the other. I can't figure out why you care anything at all about Les Feldick or any other teacher for that matter. It seems their only needed qualification is that they tickle your ears. Everyone else is a "cocky jerk" who "manipulates scripture" by doing nothing at all but quoting it. Weird.
 

xfrodobagginsx

Active member
You don't understand the Bible. I am worshiping the God of the bible. You are changing the nature of the god of the Bible into what you want it to be, Without any scriptural proof. I can use the Bible to back up my arguments. You obviously can't. Not a single verse to prove that God doesn't know all things.

1 John 3:20 KJV
[20] For if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things

Don't act like a religious, cocky jerk and I won't treat you like one. You have knowledge but no wisdom. I don't respect your opinion on Scripture because you don't believe the obvious. You have no Scripture to prove your point, just denial.
 
Last edited:

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
Not gonna listen to someone who tries to change the nature of God from the Biblical way of God knowing all things to some finite being who doesn't know everything, is not all-powerful...

Of God doesn't know all things, He cannot be trusted to Govern all things. But thankfully, the Bible does say that God knows all things, Created all things and holds all things together. God is all powerful and all knowing after all.

It doesn't take much Theological Knowledge or understand to get that.

Are you sure your not a Jehovah's Witness cult memeber, denying the deity of Christ in spite all all of the Biblical evidence? Do you even care about what Scripture says at all?

Oh no, all doesnt mean all anymore, it just means sometimes.

You have no valid reason to say that all doesnt mean all in Scripture. You just want the Bible to fit your false views. Why can you believe the Bible in some areas, but not others? Just curious?

Do you think that when Jesus says, "THIS is My body," that He means, "ALL of THIS, that I AM holding, IS My body"?
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
You don't understand the Bible.
Saying it doesn't make it so.

If you can do something other than just declare your doctrine to be true and call me idiotic names, like make a real argument then I'd enjoy the exchange but this is boring.

I am worshiping the God of the bible.
You believe that but cannot prove it because it isn't actually the case.


You are changing the nature of the god of the Bible into what you want it to be, Without any scriptural proof.
I have shown you the biblical proof. I have quoted it directly.

Here's the problem you are faced with. If your understanding of God is correct then the bible is self-contradictory but you claim that your understanding of God comes from the bible which directly undermines your understanding of God. You are literally eating the cake you're trying to keep.

I can use the Bible to back up my arguments.
You cited a single proof-text. I responded with a reasonable grammatical explanation showing that ‘all’ does not usually mean ‘every single one’, which is an explanation fully consistent with well-established hermeneutical principles used by theologians throughout history, including your own favorite teacher. Instead of engaging with that, you replied with hostility and name-calling.

You obviously can't. Not a single verse to prove that God doesn't know all things.
I QUOTED SEVERAL!!! What are you even talking about!!!

Verses Showing God Testing or Seeking to Know:

Genesis 22:12 – After Abraham’s willingness to sacrifice Isaac, God says, “Now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.”​
Deuteronomy 8:2 – God says He tested Israel “to know what was in your heart, whether you would keep His commandments or not.”​
Exodus 16:4 – God gives manna “that I may test them, whether they will walk in My law or not.”​

Verses Showing God Changing His Mind / Repenting: (There can't be ever any reason to change your mind if you know every single thing.)

Genesis 6:6 – “And the Lord was sorry that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart.”​
I Samuel 15:11 – “I greatly regret that I have set up Saul as king.”​
Exodus 32:14 – After Moses intercedes, “So the Lord relented from the harm which He said He would do to His people.”​

Jonah 3:10 – “Then God saw their works, that they turned from their evil way; and God repented from the disaster that He had said He would bring upon them, and He did not do it.” (This verse is effectively the main point of the entire book of Jonah.)​

Verses Where God Asks Questions / Seeks Information: (These could be rhetorical questions that God asks but that doesn't mean these are at least evidence for my position. Since you're here making false claims about there being "not one single verse", I'm pulling out the stops.

Genesis 3:9, 11, 13 – God asks Adam and Eve, “Where are you? … Who told you that you were naked? … What is this you have done?”​
Genesis 4:9–10 – God asks Cain, “Where is Abel your brother?” and “What have you done?”​
Verses Where God Doesn't Get What He Desires or Expects
Isaiah 5:4 – God laments, “What more could have been done to My vineyard that I have not done in it? Why then, when I expected it to bring forth good grapes, did it bring forth wild grapes?” (The whole chapter is about this specific topic.)​
Luke 7:29–30 “And when all the people heard Him, even the tax collectors justified God, having been baptized with the baptism of John. But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the will of God for themselves, not having been baptized by him.”​

Verses Showing God’s Knowledge Is Conditional / Open:

Jeremiah 18:7–10 – God describes His dealings with nations as conditional: if they repent, He will repent; if they do evil, He will reconsider the good He intended.​
Exodus 33:5 – God says, “I could come up into your midst in one moment and consume you. Now therefore, take off your ornaments, that I may know what to do to you.”​


If you're thinking that this is an exhaustive list, your sadly mistaken. The whole bible if full of this sort of thing. All it takes to see it, is to remove your Classical (Greek philosophy) colored glasses off and start thinking about God in terms of Him being a real person.

1 John 3:20 KJV
[20] For if our heart condemn us, God is greater than our heart, and knoweth all things
Once again, this is a generalization. Taken in a woodenly literal way, however, it is an overstatement. The bible is clear that there are things that God does not know. There are things that He chooses not to know (like the specifics of what was going on in Sodom and Gomorrah) and there are things that God cannot know (like whether Israel, on the whole, would respond to Him in faith).

Incidentally, expecting something is not the sort of "knowing" that I'm talking about here. Jesus, for example, knew Peter well enough to predict his denials but Peter could have repented and Jesus would have been both elated and astonished at the strength of his faith.

Don't act like a religious, cocky jerk and I won't treat you like one.
You read things into my comments that are not there. Trust me, if you're getting attitude from me, you'll know it. If there is any shadow of doubt about it at all, it doesn't exist.

You have knowledge but no wisdom.
Yeah, like I give a damn about your opinions of my mental state. You're an unstable man-child who reacts emotionally rather than responds rationally. It's like debating with a teenage girl.

I don't respect your opinion on Scripture because you don't believe the obvious.
If it's so obvious then make an argument. An ACTUAL argument - not a proclamation of something you claim to be "obvious".

You have no Scripture to prove your point, just denial.
You are a liar. Yes, I meant that literally. You are, in fact, a liar.

How is it possible for people to act like the thread they are posting in isn't still here?

Post #195
Post #206
Post #211
Post #215
Post #228

And now, in this post, I basically buried you in an avalanche of passages, some of which are whole chapters, others of which are entire books of the bible and ALL of which you are almost certainly going to ignore.

So, basically every post I've made of any length on this whole thread has cited scripture, most of which quoted them directly, not to mention all the posts by RightDivider which cite several of the same texts, which you routinely ignore and are now trying to pretend don't exist.

There's no way you forgot. You knew when you wrote this stupidity that it was a lie. Who is it that you're trying to fool here, anyway?
 
Last edited:
Top