Right Divider
Body part
I think that you might be mixing me up with @JudgeRightly again...You and Right Divider say that.
I think that you might be mixing me up with @JudgeRightly again...You and Right Divider say that.
Yes, of course I am. I don't know why I can't keep the two of you straight!I think that you might be mixing me up with @JudgeRightly again...
Les is better. I listend to your guy. He didn’t convince me either of his argument against the Church being grafted braches. There is no one else ot could be. He believes he believes it will be people on Israel who accept their messiahBecause he's an excellent MidActs Pauline dispensational teacher.
I would think so.
You continue in your stubborn confusion.Les is better. I listend to your guy. He didn’t convince me either of his argument against the Church being grafted braches. There is no one else ot could be. He believes he believes it will be people on Israel who accept their messiah
..
Its not stubborness. Les is a much better Teacher than your guy. His cross references are unbeatable.You continue in your stubborn confusion.
The body of Christ is a NEW CREATURE and not something added to something else.
You act like you worship the guy. How about you actually interact with those that are talking to you?Its not stubborness. Les is a much better Teacher than your guy. His cross references are unbeatable.
At best you're speaking out of ignorance. Bob Enyart so rigorously went through all of the available biblical material on a given subject that it was a veritable wonder to behold. I never knew is was even possible to nail down a doctrine with so much biblical weight until I found Bob Enyart's ministry and read his book, The Plot.Its not stubborness. Les is a much better Teacher than your guy. His cross references are unbeatable.
It's cool that I read your post this morning. I just got through listening to a bible study of Bob's on the second coming of Christ in his series on "What We Believe and Why We Believe It" this morning. Not half and hour ago. He made this exact point about how the Matthew passage that so many think is referring to the rapture isn't discussing the rapture at all.Les Feldick had a good saying. People take the NT and throw it a blender and hit go.
I was talking pre-trib with someone who says he agrees on X. And he included Matthew and John somehow. I have seen the Matthew 24 before, with clowns like Pat Robertson and Jimmy Swaggart. He is describing judgment, as in the days of Noah. Not the departure of the church and grace. Same thing. Mixes it all together.
Simple confirmation bias.Regarding Matthew 24, it's a classic case of Churchianity to emphasize similarities and ignore differences. It causes a great deal of confusion and attempts to fight against right division.
Thanks for mentioning that. I hadn't thought about it that way. Totally true.Simple confirmation bias.
As in the days of Noah...I thought it was obvious when I wasn't studying and reading the Bible.He made this exact point about how the Matthew passage that so many think is referring to the rapture isn't discussing the rapture at all.