Election Fraud

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Well the truth where it comes to election fraud is that there wasn't any - widespread at least - and Fox has forked out over 750 million dollars to Dominion after being dumb enough to peddle it. Sacking captain two face Tucker hardly did them any favours either though doubtless there's plenty far right dimwits who'll still follow the guy wherever he ends up...
 
Last edited:

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
.https://twitter.com/KariLakeWarRoom/status/1659319007831552001?s=20


.https://twitter.com/Rach_IC/status/1659319431242321920?s=20



.https://twitter.com/KariLake/status/1659303668565549062?s=20
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Oh wow, "Kari Lake War Room"?

Scam room more like. She lost, by miles, just like Trump. Still, hey ho. The far right are such a gullible audience who part with their dollars to fund these folk and it's kinda hysterical to see a pompous right wing Brit git take her to task on election fraud. Kinda the icing on the cake...

 

way 2 go

Well-known member

Kari Lake’s lawsuit against Maricopa County’s supervisor of elections had a pretty good day at trial yesterday. Lake’s lawyers argued that the SOE’s log files showed they didn’t even TRY to fulfill legally-required signature matching.

First Kari’s lawyers explained that, in order to actually verify a signature, the election workers should’ve scrolled down on the computer screen in order to compare the two signatures together. One of the signatures can’t be seen unless you scroll. But the amount of time workers actually took to do approve each signature suggests they couldn’t possibly have scrolled, and thus, couldn’t possibly have compared the signatures together.

Kari’s lawyer explained it to the Court:

What that log data shows, your honor, is that over 274,000 ballots were approved at less than 3 seconds each. That includes one signature verifier who approved 100% of the 36,900 signatures that he verified at less than 3 seconds a signature. Maricopa’s log file data shows that 11 of these signature verification workers approved 170,000 signatures at a rate of between 0 and 2.99 seconds with a 99.97% approval rating. That’s not signature review, your Honor. Simply flashing a signature on the screen, clicking a button, and moving on, is not signature review.​




This is a powerful argument. It’s powerful because it’s a simple, straightforward concept that anyone can grasp, and not some highly-technical legal argument about arcane elections procedures, ballot dimensions, or ballot rejection algorithms. Lake’s point relies entirely on hard data — “proof” — and doesn’t require anyone to speculate about what “might” have happened in the middle of the night while the cameras were off.

Arizona’s supervisor at the time of the counting, or non-counting, who was a competing gubernatorial candidate, plainly didn’t make the elections workers verify signatures as required by law. It’s that simple. The numbers don’t lie. Now Maricopa will have to argue there simply wasn’t enough time to comply with the statute, even though they had weeks and weeks to count ballots, and even though they never complained about being unable to perform signature matching AT THE TIME.

Which makes the “not enough time” excuse a post-hoc justification rather than evidence.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
invective, ridicule and irrational demands for "cites."
Well, where it comes to the 2020 election then there's nothing credible of any description that supports widespread voter fraud. Trump lost, that's it. The same with Kari Lake. Tucker Carlson didn't actually buy into it even though he was happy enough to spoon feed those who wanted to hear it all on Fox. Why has Fox sacked him and settled out of court with Dominion in excess of 750 million dollars? Do the math, it's easy enough. Or carry on being duped if you want, it's your call.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member

Kari Lake’s lawsuit against Maricopa County’s supervisor of elections had a pretty good day at trial yesterday. Lake’s lawyers argued that the SOE’s log files showed they didn’t even TRY to fulfill legally-required signature matching.

First Kari’s lawyers explained that, in order to actually verify a signature, the election workers should’ve scrolled down on the computer screen in order to compare the two signatures together. One of the signatures can’t be seen unless you scroll. But the amount of time workers actually took to do approve each signature suggests they couldn’t possibly have scrolled, and thus, couldn’t possibly have compared the signatures together.

Kari’s lawyer explained it to the Court:




This is a powerful argument. It’s powerful because it’s a simple, straightforward concept that anyone can grasp, and not some highly-technical legal argument about arcane elections procedures, ballot dimensions, or ballot rejection algorithms. Lake’s point relies entirely on hard data — “proof” — and doesn’t require anyone to speculate about what “might” have happened in the middle of the night while the cameras were off.

Arizona’s supervisor at the time of the counting, or non-counting, who was a competing gubernatorial candidate, plainly didn’t make the elections workers verify signatures as required by law. It’s that simple. The numbers don’t lie. Now Maricopa will have to argue there simply wasn’t enough time to comply with the statute, even though they had weeks and weeks to count ballots, and even though they never complained about being unable to perform signature matching AT THE TIME.

Which makes the “not enough time” excuse a post-hoc justification rather than evidence.
Charlie Kirk?!

Kirk promotes the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, and has described universities as "islands of totalitarianism."[4][38][39]

In a 2015 speech at the Liberty Forum of Silicon Valley, Kirk stated that he had applied to the United States Military Academy in West Point, New York, and was not accepted.[40] He said that "the slot he considered his went to 'a far less-qualified candidate of a different gender and a different persuasion'" whose test scores he claimed he knew.[41] He told The New Yorker in 2017 that he was being sarcastic when he said it.[41] He told the Chicago Tribune in 2018 that "he was just repeating something he'd been told,"[9][42] while at a New Hampshire Turning Point event featuring Rand Paul in October 2019 he claimed that he never said it.[42]

On July 7, 2018, Kirk falsely claimed on social media that Justice Department statistics showed an increase in human trafficking arrests from 1,952 in the year 2016 to 6,087 in the first half of 2018. He deleted the tweet without an explanation the next day, after a fact-checker had pointed out that the false 2018 number had originated on conspiracy site 8chan.[43][44]

In December 2018, Kirk falsely claimed that protesters in the French yellow vests movement chanted "We want Trump." These false claims were later repeated by President Trump himself.[45]

In defending the Trump administration's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Kirk falsely stated that during the H1N1 swine flu pandemic it "took President Barack Obama 'millions infected and over 1,000 deaths'" to declare a public health emergency.[46][47]

Kirk has spread falsehoods about voter fraud[48][49] and the COVID-19 pandemic.[50] According to Forbes, Kirk is known for "his repudiation of liberal college education and embrace of pro-Trump conspiracy theories."[50]

 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Well, where it comes to the 2020 election then there's nothing credible of any description that supports widespread voter fraud. Trump lost, that's it. The same with Kari Lake. Tucker Carlson didn't actually buy into it even though he was happy enough to spoon feed those who wanted to hear it all on Fox. Why has Fox sacked him and settled out of court with Dominion in excess of 750 million dollars? Do the math, it's easy enough. Or carry on being duped if you want, it's your call.

Why are you still in denial?
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
What else?

Playing stupid is unbecoming, Arty.
Being stupid is hardly becoming either and that's what it amounts to where it comes to buying into widespread election fraud nonsense. If you wanna buy into conspiracy rubbish then the denial is all yours dude. Trump simply lost, as did Lake, his wannabe protege. Would be funny were it not for the grifting involved. Heck, even plenty on the far right have had enough of it all by now so what's with you?
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Being stupid is hardly becoming either and that's what it amounts to where it comes to buying into widespread election fraud nonsense. If you wanna buy into conspiracy rubbish then the denial is all yours dude. Trump simply lost, as did Lake, his wannabe protege. Would be funny were it not for the grifting involved. Heck, even plenty on the far right have had enough of it all by now so what's with you?

This is called "denial."
 
Top