More election fraud

[Arthur Brain]

What exactly do you mean by "won the election"?

To win the election is to get more votes than the other guy gets, no?

So, again, what (to use your phrase) "credible evidence" do you have that Biden got more votes than Trump got?
In other words, what "credible evidence" do you have that Biden won the election?

I'm not asking you for things you and your fellow Nazi leftards at Fox News are wont to say because of your Nazi leftard bias and disdain for Trump; I'm asking you what "credible evidence" do you have that Biden won the election?

Fox News? Seriously? That was Trump's go to outlet you dope...I don't follow them at all.

:freak:

Yes, the results. Biden has far more electoral votes than Trump and is set to finish on 306. He's already passed the 270 figure that is sufficient to win the presidency.

Spend the next two months in denial if you want and cling onto the bonkers hope that evidence of election fraud will somehow come to light. You're only going to be more disappointed than you are already.

 

[Gary K]

What exactly do you mean by "won the election"?

To win the election is to get more votes than the other guy gets, no?

So, again, what (to use your phrase) "credible evidence" do you have that Biden got more votes than Trump got?
In other words, what "credible evidence" do you have that Biden won the election?

I'm not asking you for things you and your fellow Nazi leftards at Fox News are wont to say because of your Nazi leftard bias and disdain for Trump; I'm asking you what "credible evidence" do you have that Biden won the election?

If he gives any "evidence" it will be an election map from some page from the mockingbird media that says Biden won and gives a fraudulent election map. He'll also claim the media certifies elections. It doesn't, but that will be his claim, or that other nations certify the election. He can't point to the Electoral College which officially certifies US presidential elections because they have not certified this election.

 

[Arthur Brain]

You're really trying hard, creeper! Too late. And, your backpedaling attempts are transparent, anyhow. You obviously like to talk about kids more than just about anything else on TOL, and you're always posting things to the effect that you think you might be talking to kids on TOL.

So, you're claiming that I like to talk about kids more than just about anything else on TOL?

Go on, back that up. You'll have as much evidence for that as Trump's claims of election fraud.

 

[7djengo7]

If he gives any "evidence" it will be an election map from some page from the mockingbird media that says Biden won and gives a fraudulent election map. He'll also claim the media certifies elections. It doesn't, but that will be his claim, or that other nations certify the election. He can't point to the Electoral College which officially certifies US presidential elections because they have not certified this election.

His "evidence" for any of the noises he makes as a Nazi leftard/Darwin cheerleader is to call those who ask questions that he knows he can't answer, "kids".

 

[Arthur Brain]

If he gives any "evidence" it will be an election map from some page from the mockingbird media that says Biden won and gives a fraudulent election map. He'll also claim the media certifies elections. It doesn't, but that will be his claim, or that other nations certify the election. He can't point to the Electoral College which officially certifies US presidential elections because they have not certified this election.

It really would go better for you just to accept that Trump lost. You really do have to be unhinged to think that there's any possibility of these wingnut claims overturning the result. Just deal with it.

 

[7djengo7]

So, again, what (to use your phrase) "credible evidence" do you have that Biden got more votes than Trump got?

<NO ANSWER>

In other words, what "credible evidence" do you have that Biden won the election?

<NO ANSWER>

 

[Arthur Brain]

His "evidence" for any of the noises he makes as a Nazi leftard/Darwin cheerleader is to call those who ask questions that he knows he can't answer, "kids".

No, the evidence lies in the results, accepted globally and freely available to view. Conspiracy nuttery notwithstanding of course...

 

[Gary K]

His "evidence" for any of the noises he makes as a Nazi leftard/Darwin cheerleader is to call those who ask questions that he knows he can't answer, "kids".

Yeah, he uses a lot of ad hominen attacks as "evidence". He also uses evidence-free assertions as being big time truth telling. Yet somehow he ends of having no evidence other than claims from Trump haters that Trump lost, even though the election has never been certified.

 

[Arthur Brain]

[/SIZE]

Hey, dream on if you think Trump is going to retain his presidency if it makes you feel better. Not gonna happen. He's lost, period.

Might as well deal with it now.

 

[7djengo7]

It really would go better for you just to accept that Trump lost.

What "credible evidence" have you got that Trump got less votes than Biden?

 

[Arthur Brain]

Yeah, he uses a lot of ad hominen attacks as "evidence". He also uses evidence-free assertions as being big time truth telling. Yet somehow he ends of having no evidence other than claims from Trump haters that Trump lost, even though the election has never been certified.

Hmm, so where is this "evidence" that Trump claims for election fraud exactly? If you have a reputable source then by all means bring it. Otherwise, the world moves on and accepts that Biden is the president elect.

 

[7djengo7]

He's lost, period.

What "credible evidence" do you have that Trump lost; what "credible evidence" do you have that Trump got less votes than Biden?

Is your "credible evidence" the fact that you wrote "period" at the end of your claim?

 

[Arthur Brain]

What "credible evidence" have you got that Trump got less votes than Biden?

The results.

:duh:

 

[Arthur Brain]

What "credible evidence" do you have that Trump lost; what "credible evidence" do you have that Trump got less votes than Biden?

Is your "credible evidence" the fact that you wrote "period" at the end of your claim?

The results.

:duh:

 

[7djengo7]

Hmm, so where is this "evidence" that Trump claims for election fraud exactly? If you have a reputable source then by all means bring it. Otherwise, the world moves on and accepts that Biden is the president elect.

Hmm, so where is this "evidence" that Biden claims for election legitimacy exactly? If you have a reputable source then by all means bring it. Otherwise, those who are not your fellow Nazi leftards move on and accept that Biden is not the president elect.

 

[chair]

He can't point to the Electoral College which officially certifies US presidential elections because they have not certified this election.

Of course- since the Electoral College hasn't met yet. Wait and see.

Ever read "when prophecy fails"? Try it. It is an interesting...mirror.

 

[7djengo7]

The results.

:duh:

Since, by "the results", you are referring to your Nazi leftard claim that Biden got more votes than Trump, what you're telling us is that your Nazi leftard claim that Biden got more votes than Trump is "evidence" for your Nazi leftard claim that Biden got more votes than Trump.

 

[Gary K]

Hmm, so where is this "evidence" that Trump claims for election fraud exactly? If you have a reputable source then by all means bring it. Otherwise, the world moves on and accepts that Biden is the president elect.

I've shown all kinds of evidence of election fraud and you, as usual, won't even read it. You reject it out of hand with no evidence on your part that what I posted isn't true. Your only "evidence" is, I don't like that source so I won't even investigate whether it is true or not. In other words, you show extreme bias. You refuse evidence based upon your own biases. It's called circular reasoning and it's a major fallacy. But, you don't care for you circular reasoning is sufficient for your own purposes.

 

[7djengo7]

Of course- since the Electoral College hasn't met yet. Wait and see.

Ever read "when prophecy fails"? Try it. It is an interesting...mirror.

Speaking of coping mechanisms, what did you do when you got unbearably frustrated with yourself for your incompetence to answer the most elementary questions I have asked you about (among other things) the rank stupidities you write on TOL as a Darwin cheerleader? Hmmmm....Oh, that's right: you put me on "ignore".

 

[Arthur Brain]

I've shown all kinds of evidence of election fraud and you, as usual, won't even read it. You reject it out of hand with no evidence on your part that what I posted isn't true. Your only "evidence" is, I don't like that source so I won't even investigate whether it is true or not. In other words, you show extreme bias. You refuse evidence based upon your own biases. It's called circular reasoning and it's a major fallacy. But, you don't care for you circular reasoning is sufficient for your own purposes.

Oh, I've read some of it alright and just shook my head at it. It's exactly the type of out there stuff that I'd expect.

Tell ya what. If this supposed evidence that hasn't been provided and claims of such that have been summarily dismissed do actually come to light and Trump is actually given a second term, then I will gladly eat crow and unconditionally admit that I was completely and utterly wrong to have been so gullible as to believe the accepted news and will even say that Donald Trump is great.

How about that?