Arthur Brain
Well-known member
I logged out and then I could see it, which made me realize that when I put ffreeloader on ignore, it must block threads created by him too, not just his posts. :chuckle:
Yeah, I've noticed that as well. :chuckle:
I logged out and then I could see it, which made me realize that when I put ffreeloader on ignore, it must block threads created by him too, not just his posts. :chuckle:
Yeah, I've noticed that as well. :chuckle:
I logged out and then I could see it, which made me realize that when I put ffreeloader on ignore, it must block threads created by him too, not just his posts. :chuckle:
You have gotta be kidding me. You were the one who recently alluded that anna was some sort of paid operative for Soros and other bat crazy crap. How paranoid is that?!
:freak:
So you're supposed to be a 2nd amendment advocate and firmly pro life yet you support every Democrat politician around. And the Democrats official party line is that no one who runs on a pro life agenda can run as a Democrat. Wow. What firm pro life sentiments. You're actions, i.e. posting history, says you're going to vote pro death. The only pro life candidate in the 2020 presidential election is Donald Trump. The same goes for 2nd amendment rights. Every Democrat is for pushing aside 2nd amendment rights.:chuckle:
Considering I'm a 2A (with limitations) gun owner and remain firmly pro-life, it's pretty unlikely I'm a fellow traveler, but hey... people gotta cling to their illusions.
Her posting fits the profile of paid Democrat operatives. That you don't understand that these people exist is a matter of your ignorance, not mine. I've posted evidence here that shows this has been a Democrat strategy for more than 20 years.
Hardly, she's just used to his shtick as plenty are and have been for a long time. Chances are you'll buy into his dingbat latest about a bunch of us being part of some sort of "cabal"...
Of course there's sane and obvious alternatives. Ya know, like she's just someone who has independent thought and actual critical thinking skills, not prone to hysteria or massive confirmation bias but balanced. You've admitted to taking the likes of Infowars seriously, a wingnut outfit if ever there was one. What you're referring to with "conservative talk radio" is anyone's guess but I doubt it'll be anything much different to the above given your bizarre histrionics regarding people being paid to have a contrary view. The irony of you accusing others of being brainwashed would almost be funny if it wasn't so utterly whacked out.
And more of the whacked out same. Anna is as much a Marxist as your front door is but you're so engulfed with your need to bracket anybody with an aversion to the far right and Trump that you can't see the irony of your complete lack of objectivity on the matter.
I logged out and then I could see it, which made me realize that when I put ffreeloader on ignore, it must block threads created by him too, not just his posts. :chuckle:
Well, that's what you have to do when you can't defend your own positions.
Well, I ain't a "Marxist" and pretty sure the rest of those on your somewhat demented rant aren't either and will be in as much danger of being lined up against a wall and shot in future as my cat becoming prime minister...(although he'd get my vote).
This is just unhinged rambling with no coherence or objectivity whatsoever. You coulda just said "GO TRUMP MAGA!!!" instead. Would have saved you some time...
Let's look at your "critical thinking" skills.
1. Anna supports income redistribution. That's marxist ideology. It's foundational to marxist ideology and is found only in marxism/socialism. Thus anna hold foundational marxist ideology.
2. Anna supports open borders. That comes directly from Soros who is a confirmed marxist and the idea itself is marxist. That's another marxist belief held by anna.
3. Anna supports political correctness which comes directly from marxists/marxism. The very idea comes from marxists leaders including Chairman Mao. That idea can be found nowhere but within marxism. That's a third marxist belief held by anna.
4. Anna supports gun control for she supports Democrat politicians who are all gun control proponents. Removing guns from the citizenry has been the goal of every totalitarian government ever created. And marxism is totalitarian by it's very nature. That's a fourth marxist idea.
5. Anna supports politicians who despise life for she supports these politicians who are very pro death rather than pro life. And this idea of abortion being something acceptable and being a "right" is something that originates in leftist/marxist ideology for it cannot come from conservatives who believe in God and accept the Bible as true. Remember, Marx himself was very anti-God and anti-Christianity. His ultimate goal was to destroy Christian influence in the world. Thus, anna supports marxist ideology once again.
Those five marxist ideas are core marxist ideas that express the very heart of marxist ideology.
That anna holds these positions shows her deeply held beliefs in marxist ideas and marxist principles. So, your denial of her marxist/socialist beliefs and positions is quite amusing. It's like you've never read a single post she's written. Of course when it comes from someone who was disgusted with the labor party in Britain because it wasn't implementing socialism fast enough for you your defense of her is expected as you claim not to be a marxist at heart either. Ironic that you support the marxist/socialist party in Britain and yet claim to have no marxist beliefs. :dizzy:
Oh, btw, it looks like the British people finally spoke up and gave you socialists over there quite a spanking at the polls. Go Brexit. Boo socialism.
As to infowars, you're once again wrong. But that doesn't mean anything to you. Any conservative sites like Conservative Treehouse, i.e. not marxist, is to you whacked out and crazy. Yet they have done the best investigative reporting available for the last few years. So have sites like The Federalist, Frontpage Magazine, Zero Hedge, SGTReport, John Solomon, etc.... That you ignore the fact that the mockingbird media lies to you on a consistent basis both by commission and omission doesn't speak well of your own objectivity. If you're going to accuse me, who reads both sides of the issues to yourself who reads only one side of the issues, it's you who comes out on the short end of the stick on both objectivity and critical thinking.
BTW, your posts look to me as nothing more than "unhinged rambling with no coherence or objectivity whatsoever." You don't even provide any evidence for your position you just make bald assertions. Assertions without evidence == incoherent ramblings.
Well, that's what you have to do when you can't defend your own positions.
Obviously you didn't even listen to the video. But, just in case you did, your critical thinking skills are no better than anna's.
It's usual behavior from you as it's from a conservative source and to you any conservative source is unhinged. That right there is evidence of your marxist ideology for it's only from the far left that we hear the strident declarations that conservatives are unhinged. It's your party line. Unfortunately for you Bezmenov defined the marxist groups very well. He stated that academics, journalists, intellectuals, etc... which back in the day he recorded that video could have only meant journalists from the BBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, LA Times, NT Times, etc... for no alternative media existed that opposed the marxist media. You know the very journalists you think are reliable reporters of truth were, and are, willing marxist dupes. The ideology pushed by those organizations hasn't changed a whit, other than to become more stridently marxist. He defined those who were pushing marxist thought in academia as the willing dupes of the communists/socialists as the USSR was a socialist state. The arguments you guys make against that shows your arrogance. You will denounce those who actually implement Marx's ideas as too ignorant to understand what they were doing and identifying themselves with politically. They called themselves socialists and yet you will deny their own self-description. I find that pretty amusing. But then you define every failed socialist state as not implementing "real socialism". As if you could do the magic act and create a socialist state that actually works.
BTW, your posts look to me as nothing more than "unhinged rambling with no coherence or objectivity whatsoever." You don't even provide any evidence for your position you just make bald assertions. Assertions without evidence == incoherent ramblings.
I show the evidence for my positions.
Once again, so much crazy in ffreeloader's post that I hardly know where to begin! Oh well, it's the hand I've been dealt. I'll touch on a few of the crazier points, just for amusement...
Marxism is my ideology? Thanks for letting me know. At last check, I thought I was a registered Republican with slightly left-of-center libertarian views. I'll have to double check, but in the meantime you seem to assume that you know me better than I do.
Crazy talk. There will be no "Marxist takeover," no one is going to get shot. Get back on your meds.
More crazy talk that sounds like it came straight out of the loony bin.
And I don't know why I bother because with you around, we have all the nonsense we could possibly hope to get.
So far as I'm concerned, Trump did in fact win the 2016 election fair and square. However, Putin's government has sponsored internet trolls to spread propaganda on the internet for the past decade. That's a fact. How much influence did they have? Not enough to shift the election in Trump's favor. Hillary won the popular vote by 3 million, in spite of the fact that she was a horrible candidate. See my thread entitled Hillary Clinton can't rewrite history, but she'll try for more info on that topic.
By "Ukraine hoax" are you referring to Trump's insane claim that Ukraine and the Democratic National Committee fabricated a hack to sabotage Trump's 2016 campaign and frame Russia?
Is Joe Biden corrupt? This point isn't so crazy. For starters, he vigorously absolves his crackhead son at every opportunity instead of publicly rebuking him, so I think there's got to be some corruption in there somewhere.
artie is a master of projection
Well no, it's kinda the sensible thing to do when confronted with unshakable irrationality. Ya know, things like being repeatedly accused of being a paid operative and the like...
:freak:
Okay, for a laugh, let's look at this lunacy of yours...
1: Anna supports provision for those at the lower end of the ladder, not exactly the same thing and most countries have measures like that in place, including America. Is Donald Trump a Marxist unless he gets rid of any sort of welfare for people who are out of work, sick, disabled etc?
2: I'll let anna address this directly if she so chooses but it sure ain't the wingnut version of things that you're putting forward.
3: :rotfl:
Oh wow, you don't know anna at all! "Politically correct"?! She might not be rabidly anti gay or align with the far right nut brigade on several issues but that ain't the same thing at all.
4: She owns a gun you dipstick and she addressed you directly on this and for which (surprise surprise) you had no sensible answer on point.
5: Anna is about as pro abort as a loving mother who's raised several children and has never had or even considered one. which, FYI, is Anna. Your feeble attempts to make the abortion issue into one solely about party politics is risible. If you think there's a scarcity of Republicans who don't support abortion then you really wanna extricate your head from the sand or wherever it's currently residing at...
Oh, and sure. Anna wants Christianity abolished along with your rights to worship on pain of imprisonment or death...
:dunce:
Well, considering I'm not a socialist anyway, you once again fail to make any kind of point. I've explained to you over again that I'm cynical in regards to politics all ends up and yet for some reason it still doesn't penetrate that head of yours. I can only now presume that it's for one of three reasons. You've either got too much foil on it, you're none too bright or you're happy to persist in deliberate lies about folk. Given your penchant for dopey conspiracy I'll be charitable and go with a mixture of the first two.
Um, no, Infowars is wingnuttery defined. Zerohedge et al? Yeh, your confirmation bias ain't showing at all. If you read both sides of issues with a modicum of independent thought you'd have no problem recognising outright hyperbole and sheer lunacy. I don't lap up any source of news as truth verbatim but I can sure recognize whackjob outfits when I see em'.
Coach doser, hard at work! :chuckle:
It's almost funny, almost...
I'm actually a master of not being a master of anything.

