Announcement

Collapse

Creation Science Rules

This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective.
Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed.
1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team
2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.
See more
See less

Young Earth or Old?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Young Earth or Old?

    Is the earth relatively young (6,000-10,000 years old) or is it old (millions or billions of years old)? This thread will discuss this subject. First, let us look at the following two verses which refer to the creation:
    "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth" (Gen.1:1).

    "For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited"
    (Isa.45:18).

    In the beginning the LORD created the earth and formed it to be inhabited. However, sometime after He formed it to be inhabited it became "without form" and dark so that it was no longer fitted to be inhabited:
    "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. And God said, Let there be light: and there was light. And God saw the light, that it was good: and God divided the light from the darkness. And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day" (Gen.1:5).

    What is said in "bold" in the following statement refers to the earth being inhabited before it was in a state described as being without form:
    "Of the origin of our world the first chapter of Genesis tells us nothing save that 'in the beginning,' whenever that was, God 'created' it. It may be, as Tyndall said in his Belfast address, that 'for eons embracing untold millions of years, this earth has been the theatre of life and death.' But as to this the 'Mosaic narrative' is silent. It deals merely with the renewing and refurnishing of our planet as a home for man" (Sir Robert Anderson, A DOUBTER'S DOUBTS About Science and Religion).

    Sometime after the world was no longer habitable the LORD began to re-form both the earth and the heavens to make it habitable and that took six days. So in the debate between Christian about whether the earth is young or old I say that it is old.
    Last edited by Jerry Shugart; March 27, 2019, 12:57 PM.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
    It may be ... that 'for eons embracing untold millions of years, this earth has been the theatre of life and death.'
    Or it might not be.

    But as to this the 'Mosaic narrative' is silent.
    So you've got an argument from silence.

    Got any evidence?

    I say that it is old.
    Good for you.

    Have you got any reason that it would be wrong to believe that the universe and everything in it was made in six days?
    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
    E≈mc2
    "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
    -Bob B.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Stripe View Post
      Have you got any reason that it would be wrong to believe that the universe and everything in it was made in six days?
      I just can't believe that even though the LORD formed the earth to be habitable that the following verse is speaking about the way the LORD originally formed it since it was not habitable at this point in time:

      "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep"
      (Gen.1:1-2).

      Comment


      • #4
        While I believe that the earth is very young, indeed; there are also a very large number of contemporary scientists who fall in the young earth category: HERE is a list of a few. Should the earth actually be millions of years old, it may just be that God created it with man in mind but let angels inhabit it. We aren't told yet, so it really doesn't much matter. We'll know one day.
        "That man of sin must first be revealed." -- Jesus

        If you haven't tried: you've already failed. -- Aimiel

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Aimiel View Post
          While I believe that the earth is very young, indeed; there are also a very large number of contemporary scientists who fall in the young earth category: HERE is a list of a few. Should the earth actually be millions of years old, it may just be that God created it with man in mind but let angels inhabit it. We aren't told yet, so it really doesn't much matter. We'll know one day.
          Most of the scientists you list are denying evolution, not young or old earth.

          I too deny evolution but I believe that the earth is old and not young.

          Comment


          • #6
            The earth is billions of years old, and the Universe is even older...

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
              I just can't believe...
              So no evidence then?
              Where is the evidence for a global flood?
              E≈mc2
              "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

              "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
              -Bob B.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Apple7 View Post
                The earth is billions of years old, and the Universe is even older...
                Because... reasons.
                Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                E≈mc2
                "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                -Bob B.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                  Because... reasons.
                  Einstein's Relativity...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Apple7 View Post
                    Einstein's Relativity...


                    Faraday's electrochemistry.
                    Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                    E≈mc2
                    "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                    "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                    -Bob B.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Perhaps a more important question than the age of the earth and Universe, is WHY God needed to create it in the first place.

                      There are numerous creation stories contained in scripture, and many of them have woven-in the need to specifically mention evil encompassing creation....rather strange, unless, the entire reason for creation is to conquer evil to begin with...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Apple7 View Post
                        Perhaps a more important question...
                        Sounds like you need your own thread.
                        Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                        E≈mc2
                        "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                        "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                        -Bob B.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                          So no evidence then?
                          I stated my evidence but you must have not have understood it. The following verse does not describe the way that the LORD created the earth:
                          "And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep" (Gen.1:2).

                          When the LORD created the earth it was formed to be inhabited:
                          "For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited" (Isa.45:18).

                          According to your idea the LORD made the earth without form despite the fact that the Scriptures declare that He formed it to be inhabited.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Jerry Shugart View Post
                            I stated my evidence.
                            It boils down to an argument from silence.

                            The following verse does not describe the way that the LORD created the earth:
                            Because you say so?

                            When the LORD created the earth it was formed to be inhabited:
                            And it was.

                            Still is.

                            According to your idea the LORD made the earth without form despite the fact that the Scriptures declare that He formed it to be inhabited.
                            When He started, it was without form. That's what the Bible says. When He finished, it had form and was inhabited.

                            It's a mystery to me why this is confusing you.
                            Where is the evidence for a global flood?
                            E≈mc2
                            "the best maths don't need no stinkin' numbers"

                            "The waters under the 'expanse' were under the crust."
                            -Bob B.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Stripe View Post
                              It's a mystery to me why this is confusing you.
                              You are the one who is confused because you can't seem to understand what is said here:
                              "For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited" (Isa.45:18).

                              The LORD created the earth to be inhabited. Will you answer a question for me? Do you think that the following verse describes an earth which the LORD formed to be inhabited?:
                              "And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep" (Gen.1:2).

                              Please explain how the earth could be "formed" to be inhabited even though, according to you, the earth was created by the LORD "without form."

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X