Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The Freemason and Dispensationalist Connection

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Isaiah 60
    Arise, shine; for thy light is come, and the glory of the Lord is risen upon thee.

    2 For, behold, the darkness shall cover the earth, and gross darkness the people: but the Lord shall arise upon thee, and his glory shall be seen upon thee.

    3 And the Gentiles shall come to thy light, and kings to the brightness of thy rising.

    4 Lift up thine eyes round about, and see: all they gather themselves together, they come to thee: thy sons shall come from far, and thy daughters shall be nursed at thy side.

    5 Then thou shalt see, and flow together, and thine heart shall fear, and be enlarged; because the abundance of the sea shall be converted unto thee, the forces of the Gentiles shall come unto thee.
    Originally posted by Interplanner
    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
    Originally posted by Interplanner
    You're too literal to get it.
    Originally posted by Interplanner
    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

    Comment


    • #47
      Ooh...first it was Jesuits...then Zionist Jews...then Satanist Crowley...now the Masons created dispism!!!1

      What grand conspiracy will it be next?
      "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
      Terence Mc Lean

      [most will be very surprised]


      Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
      By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by musterion View Post
        Ooh...first it was Jesuits...then Zionist Jews...then Satanist Crowley...now the Masons created dispism!!!1

        What grand conspiracy will it be next?
        The Hybrids created it?

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by musterion View Post
          Ooh...first it was Jesuits...then Zionist Jews...then Satanist Crowley...now the Masons created dispism!!!1

          What grand conspiracy will it be next?
          Ozzy Osbourne sang about dispensationalists in "Crazy Train".
          Originally posted by Interplanner
          They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
          Originally posted by Interplanner
          You're too literal to get it.
          Originally posted by Interplanner
          The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by northwye View Post
            The influence of Freemasonryin its Jewish derived doctrines and rituals came first, not only for Southern Baptists but for other evangelical denominations in which there were many Freemasons. Dispensationalism became focused on things of the Old Covenant and not only on Jesus Christ in its interest in the Old Covenant and in the Jewish Talmud and Kabballah - both continuations of Old Covenant thought, partly from the Pharisees of Christ's time -
            Wut?

            Are you completely stupid? That ain't dispism by ANY stretch.
            "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
            Terence Mc Lean

            [most will be very surprised]


            Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
            By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
              Ozzy Osbourne sang about dispensationalists in "Crazy Train".
              Only if you play it backwards.
              "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
              Terence Mc Lean

              [most will be very surprised]


              Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
              By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by musterion View Post
                Wut?

                Are you completely stupid? That ain't dispism by ANY stretch.
                That's the thing - it IS from where HE has attempted to sort things out.

                His approach is off in that aspect (as well as in other aspects).

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by musterion View Post
                  Only if you play it backwards.
                  If you play Stairway to Heaven backwards it mentions Tet Nelson Elestai.
                  Originally posted by Interplanner
                  They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                  Originally posted by Interplanner
                  You're too literal to get it.
                  Originally posted by Interplanner
                  The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Danoh View Post
                    His approach is off in that aspect (as well as in other aspects).
                    How many aspects is he off on? 45?
                    Originally posted by Interplanner
                    They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                    Originally posted by Interplanner
                    You're too literal to get it.
                    Originally posted by Interplanner
                    The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
                      If you play Stairway to Heaven backwards it mentions Tet Nelson Elestai.
                      Nevheh oot raits.

                      Sounds like Dutch

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Danoh View Post
                        That's the thing - it IS from where HE has attempted to sort things out.

                        His approach is off in that aspect (as well as in other aspects).
                        If he doesn't understand even the most basic tenets of pretty much all dispensational strains - particularly the eschewing of all that was covenant Israel's as not ours - then he's too ignorant to have even started this thread. I am not at fault for pointing that out.
                        "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
                        Terence Mc Lean

                        [most will be very surprised]


                        Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
                        By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by SaulToPaul View Post
                          How many aspects is he off on? 45?
                          Many.

                          Too many to count - because he is not a Dispy

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Replace the word dispensationalism with covenant theology in his post and it makes more sense.
                            "There is one thing worse than going to Hell. That would be going to Hell and having it be a surprise."
                            Terence Mc Lean

                            [most will be very surprised]


                            Everyone who has not believed the Gospel of grace is not saved, no matter what else they believe or do.
                            By that measure, how many professing Christians are on their way to the Lake of Fire?

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by musterion View Post
                              If he doesn't understand even the most basic tenets of pretty much all dispensational strains - particularly the eschewing of all that was covenant Israel's as not ours - then he's too ignorant to have even started this thread. I am not at fault for pointing that out.
                              His approach is off by as much as 45% whereas we hybrids are off as much as 35%.
                              So, we have no room to judge.
                              Originally posted by Interplanner
                              They can't compete with a real writer and grammar scholar
                              Originally posted by Interplanner
                              You're too literal to get it.
                              Originally posted by Interplanner
                              The New Covenant preceded the Old Covenant.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by musterion View Post
                                If he doesn't understand even the most basic tenets of pretty much all dispensational strains - particularly the eschewing of all that was covenant Israel's as not ours - then he's too ignorant to have even started this thread. I am not at fault for pointing that out.
                                Nope you are not. Was not blaming you.

                                Beyond ignorant as to Dispensationalism, he is.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X