Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
Not just any homosexual thread barbarian, this one talks about all kinds of sexual perversions.

How nice that you're available as a resource for the rest of the board.

By the way, are you still for the legalization of incest?

I still don't see a compelling public interest in banning incest between adults. But then I don't see any point in jailing you for whatever it is you do.

The law isn't to protect us from ourselves. It's to protect us from other people.
 

GFR7

New member
aCultureWarrior said:
In the homosexual world, hypocrisy is the worst thing that there is. You people admire HRC founder and accused pederast Terry Bean because he practices what the homosexual culture preaches...sex with "young ones" and underage boys.

On the other hand if you preach against homosexuality but struggle with the behavior like Pastor Williams does, well then, you're the scum of the earth because you're not "proud" of your moral degeneracy.

Once again I'll share the wise words of conservative Christian Selwyn Duke from his article entitled

"When hyprocrisy is a good thing"

duke.jpg


Lest I be misunderstood, my title is somewhat figurative; hypocrisy isn't really a good state, but it can be the lesser of two evils. Sure, we should strive to elect politicians of strong moral fiber and I certainly think we can do better than Larry Craig, Barney Frank and Gerry Studds. But I do know this: I'd rather have a politician propositioning in a bathroom than proposing policy that turns the whole country into a bathroom.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2007/09/when_hypocrisy_is_a_good_thing.html
I understand his point, yes.






"But I do know this: I'd rather have a politician pastor propositioning in a bathroom park than proposing policy that turns the whole country into a bathroom."
So would I.

Just as some children would rather have a parent cheating, and keeping the family together, ('50s style) rather than a parent who honestly divorces and remarries, and then forces the children to deal with a new spouse/step-parent and a new blended family. ('80s - now style). I agree.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
(i.e. Art Brain is his own god but hasn't come up with a label for it as of yet).

Er, nope, but you keep deluding yourself with that little sound bite if you want.

"Art Brain, sexual anarchist" has a good ring to it.

Quote:
My point is that homosexuality is a 'deathstyle' and it's similar to playing Russian Roulette with 3 or 4 rounds in the cylinder.

Which is nothing more than a ridiculous and unsubstantiated comment to make in the first place.

My my, aren't you the queen of denial Art, but then if you purposely close your eyes and ears to evil, then evil doesn't exist does it Art?

It's no wonder you won't address as to whether you'd deny all heterosexuals any sort of sexual congress outside of wedlock.

It's been addressed numerous times throughout the 3 part thread, in fact it was addressed in the most important post in Part 1: out of wedlock sex is responsible for 58 million unborn babies murdered in the womb in the past 41 years and the vast majority of them are due to (drum roll)....

"consensual adult relations".

Abortion_Is_Up_To_The_Woman_And_Not_The_Man.jpg


Quote:
And yes Art, there are many things that we all can do to those who engage in the deadly behavior known as homosexuality:

Change cultural mores' so that the behavior and agenda aren't promoted as something normal.

Change laws so that those who engage in homosex are helped by finding a way out of their perversion, and those who attempt to indoctrinate children into their perverted lifestyle are severely punished.

Well your little campaigns going well on that score isn't it? Three years in and homosexuals are still allowed to live out of the closet and without fear of incarceration for having consensual adult relations. Are you disappointed that you haven't had more of an effect? After all, you boast about your pet project often enough?

Neither you or I know how many people my message has touched; but then the Truth is still the Truth whether or not people accept it.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
By the way, are you still for the legalization of incest?

I still don't see a compelling public interest in banning incest between adults.

Most perverts don't. I've posted a few articles about how the legalization of incest is next on the agenda for you sexual anarchists and will go into detail in a segment dedicated to the subject.

Would you mind if I called on your expertise on the subject to assist in that segment?

The law isn't to protect us from ourselves. It's to protect us from other people.

Being the secular Catholic that you are, obviously you can't relate to the teachings of Jesus Christ. "Loving thy neighbor as you'd love yourself" is embedded in our Judeo-Christian legislation (or at least it once was).

Of course when a society allows morally lost people to "do their own thing", as we've seen throughout this 3 part thread, "other people" and invaluable institutions are negatively affected.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
"Art Brain, sexual anarchist" has a good ring to it.

Well it would do to you...

My my, aren't you the queen of denial Art, but then if you purposely close your eyes and ears to evil, then evil doesn't exist does it Art?

Nah, I'm just not as obsessively fixated as to be duped by complete nonsense.

It's been addressed numerous times throughout the 3 part thread, in fact it was addressed in the most important post in Part 1: out of wedlock sex is responsible for 58 million unborn babies murdered in the womb in the past 41 years and the vast majority of them are due to (drum roll)....

"consensual adult relations".

Abortion_Is_Up_To_The_Woman_And_Not_The_Man.jpg

Then why don't you have an equally long running 'companion thread' on why all sexual activity outside of wedlock should be criminal?

Change cultural mores' so that the behavior and agenda aren't promoted as something normal.

Change laws so that those who engage in homosex are helped by finding a way out of their perversion, and those who attempt to indoctrinate children into their perverted lifestyle are severely punished.

Cultural mores have progressed to the point where prejudice and bigotry are becoming archaic. That's why racism, sexism, slavery and child abuse are no longer tolerated. Acknowledging the rights of homosexual adults to have relations is part and parcel of the same.

Neither you or I know how many people my message has touched; but then the Truth is still the Truth whether or not people accept it.

Well if TOL is a snapshot then most regard you as a loon from liberal to conservative, and declaring 'truth' is really not your claim to make regardless.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Just as some children would rather have a parent cheating, and keeping the family together, ('50s style) rather than a parent who honestly divorces and remarries, and then forces the children to deal with a new spouse/step-parent and a new blended family. ('80s - now style). I agree.

I'm not sure what your above paragraph has to do with Selwyn Duke's article about a conservative politician being caught in a homosexual act and how it's better to give into temptation than to publically promote it.

Certainly you aren't a graduate of the "Art Brain School of Smokescreens" are you GFR7?

In response to your above post: Follow God's Word on sexual relationships (honoring your spouse) and there would be no need for divorce and remarriage.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Cultural mores have progressed to the point where prejudice and bigotry are becoming archaic. That's why racism, sexism, slavery and child abuse are no longer tolerated. Acknowledging the rights of homosexual adults to have relations is part and parcel of the same.

I guess accused pederast/RAPIST Terry Bean who was the founder of the world's most powerful homosexual organization, the Human Rights Campaign, didn't get your memo when it comes to child abuse not being tolerated Art (it's not only tolerated in LGBTQueer movement that you defend, it's promoted).

Here's a couple of questions that I'd like to ask you and your fellow homosexualist GFR7 about HRC founder and accused pederast/RAPIST Terry Bean:

1). What do you think will happen to him (convicted of child RAPE or not?).

terry-bean-and-obama.jpg


2). What do you think should happen to him, based on his history (if convicted) of RAPING young boys, i.e. "young ones", and leading other innocent youth into a deadly behavior through the extremely powerful and influential homosexual organization that he started?
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
I guess accused pederast/RAPIST Terry Bean who was the founder of the world's most powerful homosexual organization, the Human Rights Campaign, didn't get your memo when it comes to child abuse not being tolerated Art (it's not only tolerated in LGBTQueer movement that you defend, it's promoted).

Here's a couple of questions that I'd like to ask you and your fellow homosexualist GFR7 about HRC founder and accused pederast/RAPIST Terry Bean:

1). What do you think will happen to him (convicted of child RAPE or not?).

terry-bean-and-obama.jpg


2). What do you think should happen to him, based on his history (if convicted) of RAPING young boys, i.e. "young ones", and leading other innocent youth into a deadly behavior through the extremely powerful and influential homosexual organization that he started?

If any adult is guilty of raping a child then they should be dealt with in the severest manner and as you know, laws in regards to protecting children from violent and sexual abuse have tightened considerably in regards to the same.
 

GFR7

New member
I'm not sure what your above paragraph has to do with Selwyn Duke's article about a conservative politician being caught in a homosexual act and how it's better to give into temptation than to publically promote it.

Certainly you aren't a graduate of the "Art Brain School of Smokescreens" are you GFR7?

In response to your above post: Follow God's Word on sexual relationships (honoring your spouse) and there would be no need for divorce and remarriage.
The point I made is relevant to hypocrisy vs open social change. I stand by it.
I never had to be told to be loyal to my spouse.
I have no need for smokescreens.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Here's a couple of questions that I'd like to ask you and your fellow homosexualist GFR7 about HRC founder and accused pederast/RAPIST Terry Bean:

1). What do you think will happen to him (convicted of child RAPE or not?).

2). What do you think should happen to him, based on his history (if convicted) of RAPING young boys, i.e. "young ones", and leading other innocent youth into a deadly behavior through the extremely powerful and influential homosexual organization that he started?

If any adult is guilty of raping a child then they should be dealt with in the severest manner and as you know, laws in regards to protecting children from violent and sexual abuse have tightened considerably in regards to the same.


#1) Terry Bean will will be acquitted (if it ever goes to trial due to his political connections, as shown in the picture above) or at worst be given community service if convicted and be forced to hand out towels in the shower room at summer Cub Scout camp.

2). I'm certain that Terry Bean 'groomed' the children that he molested by telling them that "As long as two people love each other, then sex between them is ok". (Refer to the table of contents for a TOL'er who used those exact words).

That being said: Due to the fact that Terry Bean "murdered" the innocence of countless children through not only the physical molestation of those boys that he sexually molested, but through the indoctrination that he and the HRC has done for decades, Terry Bean should be executed for his crimes.

Wouldn't you agree Art?
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
GFR7 suggests to Connie:
Kindly leave off calling me a homosexualist, you big, fat, moron.

It's his way of dealing with his personal problems. Projects them.

Barbarian observes:
I still don't see a compelling public interest in banning incest between adults.

Connie contradicts himself.
Most perverts don't.

So explain to us the compelling public interest in banning it. And how is it worse than what you do?

Would you mind if I called on your expertise on the subject to assist in that segment?

You're asking the wrong person. I didn't even know Dallas had gay bath houses, until you told me about them.

Barbarian observes:
The law isn't to protect us from ourselves. It's to protect us from other people.

Connie loses it again:
Being the secular Catholic that you are

Sorry, not possible. You are or you aren't. It's not an ethnic group, it's a religious affiliation.

obviously you can't relate to the teachings of Jesus Christ.

We kept His teachings and passed them on, before some man started your religion. Try to keep some respect for Him, and for the Church.

"Loving thy neighbor as you'd love yourself" is embedded in our Judeo-Christian legislation (or at least it once was).

I've seen some of your "love" for others. And I don't want to hear the details of any other kind you might be up to.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
#1) Terry Bean will will be acquitted (if it ever goes to trial due to his political connections, as shown in the picture above) or at worst be given community service if convicted and be forced to hand out towels in the shower room at summer Cub Scout camp.

I would sincerely hope not if he's actually guilty of such despicable crimes. As I pointed out to you before the law has tightened up to a zero tolerance policy in regards to the abuse of children - at least here in the UK. This is evidenced by crackdowns on internet 'child porn' rings along with celebrities being prosecuted and convicted of offences going back decades.

2). I'm certain that Terry Bean 'groomed' the children that he molested by telling them that "As long as two people love each other, then sex between them is ok". (Refer to the table of contents for a TOL'er who used those exact words).

I didn't use those 'exact words' at all and the context of which was exclusively regarding adults also. Why do you need to lie and distort?

That being said: Due to the fact that Terry Bean "murdered" the innocence of countless children through not only the physical molestation of those boys that he sexually molested, but through the indoctrination that he and the HRC has done for decades, Terry Bean should be executed for his crimes.

Wouldn't you agree Art?

If he's guilty of actual child rape then I'd lose no sleep over his demise for sure. Your melodrama in regards to the rest is something else entirely.

Oh, and btw, you "forgot" to answer this:

"Then why don't you have an equally long running 'companion thread' on why all sexual activity outside of wedlock should be criminal?"
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
#1) Terry Bean will will be acquitted (if it ever goes to trial due to his political connections, as shown in the picture above) or at worst be given community service if convicted and be forced to hand out towels in the shower room at summer Cub Scout camp.

I would sincerely hope not if he's actually guilty of such despicable crimes. As I pointed out to you before the law has tightened up to a zero tolerance policy in regards to the abuse of children - at least here in the UK. This is evidenced by crackdowns on internet 'child porn' rings along with celebrities being prosecuted and convicted of offences going back decades.

As I've pointed out (and you seem to ignore...refer to my see nor hear no evil post above) that child sex is not only a huge part of the homosexual lifestyle, indoctrination and grooming children for future sex is a huge part of the homosexual agenda.

Quote:
2). I'm certain that Terry Bean 'groomed' the children that he molested by telling them that "As long as two people love each other, then sex between them is ok". (Refer to the table of contents for a TOL'er who used those exact words).

I didn't use those 'exact words' at all and the context of which was exclusively regarding adults also. Why do you need to lie and distort?

I apologize, I probably misplaced a comma or a period in your remark.


Quote:
That being said: Due to the fact that Terry Bean "murdered" the innocence of countless children through not only the physical molestation of those boys that he sexually molested, but through the indoctrination that he and the HRC has done for decades, Terry Bean should be executed for his crimes.

Wouldn't you agree Art?

If he's guilty of actual child rape then I'd lose no sleep over his demise for sure. Your melodrama in regards to the rest is something else entirely.

As Dr. Judith Reisman wrote in her article entitled

"Gay on Gay Hate Crimes"

"Violence is part of any transient, chemically abusing, lust-based culture, and it is only natural that the homosexual movement strives to hide the truth. However, data from the mainstream homosexual weekly the Advocate, confirms the findings of Charles B Johnson and myself in “Partner Solicitation Characteristics as an Expression of Male Sexual Orientation.” That is, once sexually violated by men, boys often grow up to retaliate against men, even if they “sleep with the enemy.”

The Advocate reports 21 percent of its upscale, largely white, male respondents were sex abuse victims by age 15. Since a large number of boys are victimized between age 15 and 18, this brings the angry boy victim population into the millions. In fact, with roughly a 17 percent boy sex abuse population, the estimates of boy victims are between 6 and 8 million, some might say, walking time bombs...
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4033081&postcount=1921

There is a very good reason that I call this post "Part 3's most imporant post", as it shows what kind of "walking time bomb" a young boy that has been sexually molested by a homosexual elder has become.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4064685&postcount=2473

Oh, and btw, you "forgot" to answer this:

"Then why don't you have an equally long running 'companion thread' on why all sexual activity outside of wedlock should be criminal?"

Again, the promotion of out of wedlock sex is all part of your sexual anarchist movement.

While the act of out of wedlock sex between a man and a woman is not inherently perverted as is homosexuality, it is immoral.

Since laws decriminalizing co-habitation happened, of course along with the decriminalization of abortion, out of wedlock sex is largely responsible for 58 million unborn babies murdered in the womb, fatherless homes, drug abuse, crime, etc. etc.

Righteous laws and cultural mores can change an immoral behavior, but a perverted behavior (such as homosexuality) can never be acceptable no matter what laws or cultural mores a nation has.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
As I've pointed out (and you seem to ignore...refer to my see nor hear no evil post above) that child sex is not only a huge part of the homosexual lifestyle, indoctrination and grooming children for future sex is a huge part of the homosexual agenda.

Well no, child sex is part of a paedophilia 'lifestyle' and as you're aware such simply isn't tolerated by law or society. Any paedophile who tries to groom children for the purposes of having sex with minors is given zero tolerance.

I apologize.

So you should but thanks for finally receiving an apology from you.

As Dr. Judith Reisman wrote in her article entitled

"Gay on Gay Hate Crimes"

"Violence is part of any transient, chemically abusing, lust-based culture, and it is only natural that the homosexual movement strives to hide the truth. However, data from the mainstream homosexual weekly the Advocate, confirms the findings of Charles B Johnson and myself in “Partner Solicitation Characteristics as an Expression of Male Sexual Orientation.” That is, once sexually violated by men, boys often grow up to retaliate against men, even if they “sleep with the enemy.”

The Advocate reports 21 percent of its upscale, largely white, male respondents were sex abuse victims by age 15. Since a large number of boys are victimized between age 15 and 18, this brings the angry boy victim population into the millions. In fact, with roughly a 17 percent boy sex abuse population, the estimates of boy victims are between 6 and 8 million, some might say, walking time bombs...
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4033081&postcount=1921

Ah, a quote from an advocate of that veritable bastion of academia and historical 'truth' 'The Pink Swastika'. Pass.

There is a very good reason that I call this post "Part 3's most imporant post", as it shows what kind of "walking time bomb" a young boy that has been sexually molested by a homosexual elder has become.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4064685&postcount=2473

So, your idea of one of your most important posts in a thread is where you invent some sleazy nonsense up about another poster? I wish I could say that was surprising but in reality it really isn't...

Again, the promotion of out of wedlock sex is all part of your sexual anarchist movement.

I'm not in any such 'movement'. I'm simply pointing out how you prioritise one aspect of sexuality while effectively paying lip service to something you supposedly abhor but don't dedicate anything like the same attention to.

While the act of out of wedlock sex between a man and a woman is not inherently perverted as is homosexuality, it is immoral.

Since laws decriminalizing co-habitation happened, of course along with the decriminalization of abortion, out of wedlock sex is largely responsible for 58 million unborn babies murdered in the womb, fatherless homes, drug abuse, crime, etc. etc.

Righteous laws and cultural mores can change an immoral behavior, but a perverted behavior (such as homosexuality) can never be acceptable no matter what laws or cultural mores a nation has.

So in other words your obsessive fixation with 'perversity' trumps abortion then. Duly noted.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
GFR7 suggests to Connie:

Quote:
Kindly leave off calling me a homosexualist, you big, fat, moron.

It's his way of dealing with his personal problems. Projects them.

As I'd mentioned in other threads: I realize that cross dressing and hence giving women's name to those cross dressers is a huge part of the culture that you and GFR7 proudly identify with, but I'm a Christian male, so kindly keep your transvestite fantasies and the names that go with those fantasies to the fag hangouts that GFR7 frequents in Provincetown and whatever fag bars you hit when you come up to Seattle every June to march in the moral degenerate parade.

Barbarian observes:
I still don't see a compelling public interest in banning incest between adults.

Connie contradicts himself.
Most perverts don't.

So explain to us the compelling public interest in banning it.

Boy barbarian, that's a tough one. How do you tell someone that having sex with his father, his mother, his brother or sister is wrong?

While homosexualists like Art Brain would say something like (and undoubtedly has) "Because incestuous relationships often result in children with birth defects", I won't use that lame attempt at an argument because that implies that children with birth defects are sub human.

While I haven't pondered much on why incest should remain illegal, how about I go with this simple answer (which homosexualists like you, GFR7 and Art Brain obviously can't relate to) :

"Because God says that it's wrong".
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
As I'd mentioned in other threads: I realize that cross dressing and hence giving women's name to those cross dressers is a huge part of the culture that you and GFR7 proudly identify with, but I'm a Christian male, so kindly keep your transvestite fantasies and the names that go with those fantasies to the fag hangouts that GFR7 frequents in Provincetown and whatever fag bars you hit when you come up to Seattle every June to march in the moral degenerate parade.

You probably don't even see the irony in this do you? Either that or you're trying to deflect from all of the insidious innuendo you've made up about others up to the point of being banned for it on occasions. As a 'Christian male' I wouldn't have thought lying and inventing lurid stuff up would be quantifiable with such a self professed standpoint?

Boy barbarian, that's a tough one. How do you tell someone that having sex with his father, his mother, his brother or sister is wrong?

While homosexualists like Art Brain would say something like (and undoubtedly has) "Because incestuous relationships often result in children with birth defects", I won't use that lame attempt at an argument because that implies that children with birth defects are sub human.

While I haven't pondered much on why incest should remain illegal, how about I go with this simple answer (which homosexualists like you, GFR7 and Art Brain obviously can't relate to) :

"Because God says that it's wrong".

I've never once stated or even implied that children with birth defects are somehow 'sub human' no matter what informed their condition. If you inferred that from anything I've said then that's simply on you.
 

aikido7

BANNED
Banned
Since we're on the topic of what Jesus Christ, i.e. the Christian faith means those who identify themselves as Christian, I'd like to hear from aikido7 (who has compared the false religion of Islam to Christianity).

aikido7, come on down!

12119679.jpg
Depends upon the person, doesn't it?

Christians today are "belief-centered." To be a member of the Christian church in good standing you must give assent to a list of first-century beliefs like "Son of God," "Dying for the sins of the world," Resurrection as resuscitation, "Born of a Virgin," etc.

I tend to try to be more "action-centered." I want to assist God in enacting the Kingdom of God ON EARTH as it is in heaven.

This means taking Jesus seriously for me, not taking him literally.
Picking up my cross and following him.

I also agree with you that conservative and fundamentalist faiths are, ipso facto, false religions.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Since we're on the topic of what Jesus Christ, i.e. the Christian faith means those who identify themselves as Christian, I'd like to hear from aikido7 (who has compared the false religion of Islam to Christianity).

aikido7, come on down!

Depends upon the person, doesn't it?

Yes it does. For instance, if a person doesn't want to believe the Truth as written in Holy Scripture, then Christianity can be anything that they want it to be. I see a lot of that these days.

Christians today are "belief-centered." To be a member of the Christian church in good standing you must give assent to a list of first-century beliefs like "Son of God," "Dying for the sins of the world," Resurrection as resuscitation, "Born of a Virgin," etc.

Go figure, people read all of that in the Bible and actually believe it.

I tend to try to be more "action-centered." I want to assist God in enacting the Kingdom of God ON EARTH as it is in heaven.

Kinda like "action centered" Black Muslim-cop killer Ismaaiyl Brinsley? (He finally gets his 72 virgins and 28 little boys).
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dg...an-murders-2-nypd-cops-as-revenge-for-garner/

This means taking Jesus seriously for me, not taking him literally.
Picking up my cross and following him.

Serious in the same the way that the drag queen Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence take Jesus serious.

HunkyJesus1.jpg


I also agree with you that conservative and fundamentalist faiths are, ipso facto, false religions.

I must have missed where I said that. But of course your pro homosexual/pro abortion doctrine is the "real Christianity", not like the "false religion" that I follow.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top