musterion
Well-known member
Yeah, PneumoniaPsychoSuzuki tried the same scam on me.
Nang's SPOTD is Tet's Hit Out of the Park!
- Thread starter Nang
- Start date
- Status
Yeah, PneumoniaPsychoSuzuki tried the same scam on me.
musterion
Well-known member
Heh. That's about as substantiated as it'll get.
Careful,pops. I reckon you don't want to get Naggie grumpier, as she missed these this morning:
Nang
TOL Subscriber
There are 3 Covenants of God:
The Covenant of Redemption establiished in the Godhead, before the foundation of the world, to save a people in God the Son.
The Old Covenant of Works/Law between God and Adam that brings condemnation and death.
The New Covenant of Righteousness performed by Jesus Christ.
From these 3 covenants issue forth all the covenants revealed throughout history and in the bible.
All 3 of these covenants reveal the grace of God.
Each of these 3 covenants can be called a "Covenant of Grace."
Anyone here care to ponder this and scripturally explain why this is so?
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Is God a Covenant God? Is God a God of grace?
Nang
TOL Subscriber
I do not pit Paul's words against Jesus, but I pit his person and authority against Christ's Person and authority.
It is odd how often heir quotes Paul and how seldom she quotes Jesus.
musterion
Well-known member
Careful,pops. I reckon you don't want to get Naggie grumpier, as she missed these this morning:
A free Canons of Dordt in every box!
(if your box doesn't have one, it was God's secret will and you're probably a reprobate, kid)
As expected, another Dispensationalist who has no explanation for Rom 12:1
More proof that you don't follow Paul, you follow John Nelson Darby.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Yes, indeed:
Jesus gave the two greatest commandments, which sum up all the Law of Moses, as written in Matthew 22:36-40, Mark 12:28-34, Luke 10:26-27.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Careful,pops. I reckon you don't want to get Naggie grumpier, as she missed these this morning:
I ignore all such crap . . .
musterion
Well-known member
I refuse to talk God's Word with you anymore. You're blind and twist it however it suits you.
musterion
Well-known member
Does your hubby know you speak like that? Land's sakes.
Nang
TOL Subscriber
You should hear what he calls it . . .
More proof that you don't follow Paul, you follow John Nelson Darby.
If you really followed Paul, you would be able to explain Rom 12:1
But, as we see, not only do you have no explanation for Rom 12:1, neither do all your fellow Darby followers.
It's becoming more and more obvious that Dispensationalists are more afraid of Rom 12:1 than they are of Matt 24:34.
For people who claim to be followers of Paul, they sure are afraid of what Paul said in Rom 12:1
For people who claim to be followers of Paul, they sure are afraid of what Paul said in Rom 12:1
musterion
Well-known member
No, I can guess what a couple unregenerates talk like when church is out and the big Sunday hat goes back in the closet.
Maybe you should check Charles F. Baker's book "A Dispensational Theology" and see what he says about Rom 12:2
Nang
TOL Subscriber
Trying to change the subject away from your inability to articulate what spiritual sacrifices are?
Hmmmmm?
It's absolutely amazing Nang.
They all claim to be followers of Paul, and NOT ONE OF THEM will address what Paul said about spiritual sacrifices in Rom 12:1
I've never seen anything like it in all my 7 years on TOL.
- Status