You deserve this!

[Angel4Truth]

FTR, Kat, what she left out is that Climate Sanity is none other than Voltaire/Dolo ... the person who kept putting up call out threads to myself, Angel, Anna, Cabinetmaker ... basically anyone who dared disagree with him.

The other one ... Crucible, states he is a new user. Feel free to ask Angel about him.

Anyone with eyes, who have had even a breif conversation with him in the past under his various screenames and religions who was always found to be him right before he flamed himself off this board, knows good and well hes Sum1sgruj under yet another name.

Sad he cant man up and admit it, when everyone already knows.

 

[Angel4Truth]

Why should she have included that information? What did it have to do with ktoyous issues with crucible? What difference does it make. You keep harping on this over and over. What difference does it make that I or anyone else has been here under other names before other than to try to publicly humiliate them? As I have stated before, that while I acknowledge my bad behavior in the past, I feel no qualms whatsoever about coming back under another name. There is nothing wrong with it at all. You try to push the dishonesty angle. Let's take a closer look at whether that so called dishonesty is a bad thing.

Many people enjoy me posting here.I do no harm to.anyone posting here. The lack of knowledge of people concerning my past accounts does no one any harm. The only people affected are those who cannot tolerate my presence here due to my anti feminist world view. My so called dishonesty doesn't affect TOL management are else I would have been long gone.

The major point here is that you have absolutely nothing with this obsession of yours other than a pathetic attempt at public humiliation which has gone nowhere except in your deranged mind and maybe in some of your hyena packs minds.

I personally dont care what you do, provided you dont start doing what you were doing before.

The only thing that bothers me this time about both of you, is your dishonesty and lies about who you both were when you came back.

Other than that, if you both can control yourselves, have a ball.

 

[Rusha]

Anyone with eyes, who have had even a breif conversation with him in the past under his various screenames and religions who was always found to be him right before he flamed himself off this board, knows good and well hes Sum1sgruj under yet another name.

Sad he cant man up and admit it, when everyone already knows.

Indeed.

 

[Rusha]

I personally dont care what you do, provided you dont start doing what you were doing before.

The only thing that bothers me this time about both of you, is your dishonesty and lies about who you both were when you came back.

Other than that, if you both can control yourselves, have a ball.

Agreed ... though that doesn't seem to be the case, does it? He keeps referring to the *lynch mob" who caused him to lose his temper. That label is a slam against you as much as it is against me.

 

[Angel4Truth]

She sounds like a wife who treated her husband like a king, while he was treating her like a queen.

Tam is a great person, and I am so happy that her life was blessed with such a wonderful man.

yep and thats what some of these men dont even begin to understand, a man who is right before God and treats his family the way God tell hims to, never has to be worried about being deprived of anything.

 

[Angel4Truth]

Grosnick doesn't like me because I'm a Calvinist

And a catholic, and a protestant baptist, and an agnostic and a muslim and something else, right?

 

[1PeaceMaker]

BOLCATS claimed to not be a Christian and disparaged Christians.

 

[Angel4Truth]

Agreed ... though that doesn't seem to be the case, does it? He keeps referring to the *lynch mob" who caused him to lose his temper. That label is a slam against you as much as it is against me.

True, but no matter what he says, we cant cause him to stalk and harrass people.

People lose their temper all the time and sign off, instead of making name after name to stalk and harrass.

 

[Angel4Truth]

BOLCATS claimed to not be a Christian and disparaged Christians.

Loon, im talking about crucible in the post you addressed there. No one ever suggested that crucible was bolcats.

It would be wise to read context before you leap.

 

[Rusha]

BOLCATS claimed to not be a Christian and disparaged Christians.

That he did ...

 

[Rusha]

True, but no matter what he says, we cant cause him to stalk and harrass people.

People lose their temper all the time and sign off, instead of making name after name to stalk and harrass.

I have had people swear at me and stalk me via PM, in reps, call me names, tell me how much they look forward to me burning in hell, leave me a rep message that stated "it's too bad you weren't aborted" and still yet, I have never sworn at someone on the board, behind the scenes or physically threatened them. IF overly upset, I normally sign off for a bit or even longer until I calm down.

The lack of self control insofar as flaming out and making physical threats shows a person for who they really are.

 

[Angel4Truth]

I have had people swear at me and stalk me via PM, in reps, call me names, tell me how much they look forward to me burning in hell, leave me a rep message that stated "it's too bad you weren't aborted" and still yet, I have never sworn at someone on the board, behind the scenes or physically threatened them. IF overly upset, I normally sign off for a bit or even longer until I calm down.

The lack of self control insofar as flaming out and making physical threats shows a person for who they really are.

LOL i signed off for almost 2 months.

 

[elohiym]

Loon, im talking about crucible in the post you addressed there. No one ever suggested that crucible was bolcats.

It would be wise to read context before you leap.

You are on my thread harassing my wife (against the rules) who along with others has been commenting on the BOLCATS question. She was not addressing you and didn't quote you. It would be wise to read context before you leap.

It would also be wise for you to stop harassing my wife. The moderators told you to publicly to stop doing that the last time you harassed us. Try putting us on ignore for real this time.

 

[Angel4Truth]

You are on my thread harassing my wife (against the rules) who along with others has been commenting on the BOLCATS question. She was not addressing you and didn't quote you. It would be wise to read context before you leap.

It would also be wise for you to stop harassing my wife. The moderators told you to publicly to stop doing that the last time you harassed us. Try putting us on ignore for real this time.

Report me if you dont like it - loser. She responded to me, (not the other way around) and im not your wife, you dont get to tell me what to do. Got that? Put a stronger leash on her if you dont want me to respond back to HER addressing ME.

Cant your wife handle her own conversations without you jumping in? It looks pathetic.

PS no moderator told me any such lie, you make them up as you go.

 

[elohiym]

BOLCATS claimed to not be a Christian and disparaged Christians.

If ClimateSanity was BOLCATS, why should anyone believe he's really a Christian now, and not just someone trying to use Christians to attack Rusha? :idunno:

A person with guts could clear this up. Either way he loses, but at least there could be a bit of closure. As it stands now, I'm still concerned that BOLCATS may have been wrongfully banned.

 

[ClimateSanity]

LOL i signed off for almost 2 months.

May I have permission to speak to you in private? I want to ask some questions and I don't want a pile on.

 

[Angel4Truth]

May I have permission to speak to you in private? I want to ask some questions and I don't want a pile on.

Sure, and yes i know who you are, and give you permission even with the past junk, because i am willing to let bygones be bygones provided no weird junk starts up again.

 

[1PeaceMaker]

If ClimateSanity was BOLCATS, why should anyone believe he's really a Christian now, and not just someone trying to use Christians to attack Rusha? :idunno:

A person with guts could clear this up. Either way he loses, but at least there could be a bit of closure. As it stands now, I'm still concerned that BOLCATS may have been wrongfully banned.

I'm worried about that, too. My implied earlier point in a general sense to all reading this thread was that it is interesting that some of these socks have no problem professing a different religion. It really hurts their credibility in whatever form they manifest down the road. (assuming BOLCATS is a sock) - If he's not a sock I feel bad for him because as it stands, all he is to me and others here now is someone's hypocritical alter ego.

 

[elohiym]

Report me if you dont like it - loser.

I would prefer if you would just ignore us, like you said you would earlier in this thread after you falsely accused us and were later proven wrong by Sherman.

She responded to me, (not the other way around)

She didn't respond to you, just posted a comment about BOLCATS relevant to the discussion that was taking place.

and im not your wife, you dont get to tell me what to do. Got that?

You are projecting. I was telling you to follow the moderator's rules for you that were posted publicly. I was rightfully defending my wife!

Put a stronger leash on her if you dont want me to respond back to HER addressing ME.

Put a strong leash on her? Where is Kat to defend women?

Cant your wife handle her own conversations without you jumping in? It looks pathetic.

I think it looks fine when a husband participates with his wife on a forum and defends her against false accusations and harassment. It would look pathetic if I didn't speak up. :duh:

 

[1PeaceMaker]

I think it looks fine when a husband participates with his wife on a forum and defends her against false accusations and harassment. It would look pathetic if I didn't speak up. :duh:

:up: That's my guy! Thanks, hon.

You did such a good job (again) I have nothing to add to what you said to her, and appreciate the reprieve you afford from dealing with her hostility - especially as the third trimester of this pregnancy approaches.