What was i responding to? If you cant figure out what i responded to when you said it, thats not my problem.
Why Homosexuality Must NOT Be Criminalized
- Thread starter The Horn
- Start date
What was i responding to? If you cant figure out what i responded to when you said it, thats not my problem.
glassjester
Well-known member
I meant, would you alone have not engaged in homosexual activity?
Would you have thought, as I assume you do now, "That's disgusting; I'm not going to do that." ?
glassjester
Well-known member
You said homosexuality was not the norm. But it was.
AB, your stance is asinine.
To claim one is born a certain way based on attraction to "whatever" doesnt mean its ok, doesnt mean its right, doesnt mean its acceptable, period.
Murder isnt acceptable because one is attracted to it, rape isnt acceptable because one is attracted to it, pedophilia, isnt acceptable because one is attracted to it, and theft, and homosexual relations, etc, are not acceptable because someone is attracted to it. Period.
To claim one is born a certain way based on attraction to "whatever" doesnt mean its ok, doesnt mean its right, doesnt mean its acceptable, period.
Murder isnt acceptable because one is attracted to it, rape isnt acceptable because one is attracted to it, pedophilia, isnt acceptable because one is attracted to it, and theft, and homosexual relations, etc, are not acceptable because someone is attracted to it. Period.
All people are attracted to various sins, they just vary.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Er, you responded to a post by me with, presumably a point? If you don't know what that was then it's not on me to work that out...
glassjester
Well-known member
The difference, of course, being consent.
Presumably, the victim of theft did not want his goods stolen.
He knows what he said and what i responded to, hes pretending he doesnt. Like he often does, in order to obfuscate the point so he doesnt have to adress what he fell into.
glassjester
Well-known member
I find it more expedient, when people play dumb, to simply take them at face value.
That's not intended to be insulting to AB.
Corporations consent because they don't willingly share the wealth though with all those who didnt earn it, so they want to be stolen from. Makes it ok. They shouldn't make it so attractive. (commercialism)
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
No more asinine than religious zealots insisting that homosexuality is a "choice" that straight people can make. Considering that gay or bisexual people aren't hurting or violating other people as long as it's within a consenting adult paradigm then all you're left with is self righteous bluster. As far as the law is concerned then homosexual relations are acceptable, and as it should be.
glassjester
Well-known member
There are a lot of theories out there.
glassjester
Well-known member
That's a stretch.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Hey, if you think I failed to address anything or 'fudged' the issue then instead of the indirect crap, how about you say just exactly what it was, ok?
lain:
glassjester
Well-known member
Or there's no such thing as orientation.
The Greeks didn't have it.
Are we so genetically different from them?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
If you're straight then any sexual 'sin' is going to involve the opposite sex. Or are you as bonkers as SOD as to think that Hugh Hefner is potentially gay?!
:freak:
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
How about you start with yourself? Are you attracted to the opposite gender, the same or both?
:think:
Hey, if you think I failed to address anything or 'fudged' the issue then instead of the indirect crap, how about you say just exactly what it was, ok?
Im not a theif or rapist or murderer either but i could choose to be.
Do i think its possible hugh dabbled around with guys too? Sure, hes a sex freak.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
As was heterosexuality when conceded, even though 'orientation' didn't exist apparently. Get back when you've something of substance A4T.