You're the one who asked about the wedding, not me.
I said that Jesus had to die before Israel could marry Him again because of the divorce.
Since God divorced Israel because of adultery, how could there not have been a wedding?
ECT What is the true root objection to MAD?
- Thread starter musterion
- Start date
You're the one who asked about the wedding, not me.
I said that Jesus had to die before Israel could marry Him again because of the divorce.
Since God divorced Israel because of adultery, how could there not have been a wedding?
Check Acts. There is your free clue today. They are always free at TOL, even for idiots like you.
Why don't you ask Chrysostom that question. He says the Pope was founded in Rome and they decide. Why don't you correct him? Because you are a demon possessed pervert that has no interest in helping the lost. You are a wolf.
Show us Nick
Rom 1:16 says the Gospel of Christ went to the Jew first.
Show us where in Acts the Gospel of Christ stopped going to the Jew first?
Your question makes no sense. Paul's gospel went to the Jew first. Galatians 2 is not about who it is going to, but what is being preached. If it was where they were going, then going to the Jew first would have to be wrong.
Um....because I don't see Chrysostom constantly quoting Rom 1:16, and claiming Rom 1:16 is for believers today like heir does.
I don't recall the Catholics having an explanation for Rom 1:16 either. However, I don't recall Catholics constantly quoting Rom 1:16 and claiming it is for believer today like heir does.
First he would have to comment on Rom 1:!6
What makes you think that Darby followers are not "the lost"?
1. Deceit. You misquoted me:
"Originally Posted by john w
we follow a "fallible man."-Tet. allegedly quoting me
Delete your post.
2."You're the one that said you follow a fallible man (John Nelson Darby)"
Everone does, you sniveling punk. Unless you can produce these infallible men/women, you're engaging in deceit, satanic sophistry.
Identify these infallible men/women, that you claim you follow, instead of fallible men/women, that you employ as an "argument" against MAD.
Now.
Does Paul's gospel still go to the Jew first today?
If no, then please show with scripture when it stopped going to the Jew first?
I didn't know that you were a supporter of the National Organization of Women.
Are you also a follower of Ellen G. White?
I've challenged you and everyone else to show the sole person responsible for Preterism.
To date, no one has been able to do so.
John Nelson Darby is the indisputable inventor of Dispensationalism. Therefore, you are a follower of John Nelson Darby.
Until you can show the sole person responsible for Preterism, you have no argument.
His cute little "Er no."
Nice, wimp.
Habitual liar. You said that the law was nailed to the cross.
Habitual liar, Craigie, as he asserts that lost individuals during Paul's time, and Paul, prior to being saved had the law for these 2 purposes....
Galatians 3:24 KJV
Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
Romans 3:20 KJV
Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin.
....but not any more, as it was"nailed to the cross."
Your father the devil taught you how to delete from the book.
1 John 3:4 KJV
Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.
Romans 4:15 KJV
because the law worketh wrath: for where no law is, there is no transgression.
Romans 5:13 KJV
(for until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
Satanic Craigie.
What does the word "was" mean?
The law "was"......
Paul didn't say the law "is".....
If the law of Moses was still in place, Paul wouldn't have used the word "was" to describe it.
I would suggest "everyone" to place "Nit-Wits" like Tet on ignore! He adds
NOTHING to the conversation! He's a Troll with a capital "T"
NOTHING to the conversation! He's a Troll with a capital "T"
Very well. You were told.
Deceit-again-you charge MAD with following fallible men, you demon.
Everyone does, you sniveling punk. Unless you can produce these infallible men/women, you're engaging in deceit, satanic sophistry.
Until you can show the infallible men/women that taught you AD 70-sm/Preterism, you have no argument against MAD, and are engaging in satanic sophistry, deceit.
heir
TOL Subscriber
What a stupid question. Any saved individual can and should 2 Timothy 2:15 KJV.
Cute. Thanks for the opening, Wimpy.
heir
TOL Subscriber
He holds the truth in unrighteousness as 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 has been preached to him over and over and he believes not that it is sufficient to save him (2 Corinthians 4:3-4 KJV). He's as lost as a ball in a field of tall grass.
heir
TOL Subscriber
:chuckle:
That's not correct.
Darby, as far as is known, was the first to systematize dispensational concepts, but dispensational concepts preceded Darby.
He did not 'invent' dispensational concepts.
There are clearly 'house laws/dispensations/economies/administrations/stewardships' in the Scriptures.