58 Dead, 500 Plus Wounded

[Idolater]

Who's stopping them?

Law enforcement, enforcing unconstitutional laws.

 

[quip]

So go buy one :idunno:

I CAN'T!
The mean ol' Government won't let me!!

 

[Stripe]

I can't! The mean ol' Government won't let me!!

:mock: Quip.

 

[quip]

Oh. So you were just trolling then.

If you didn't approve of what I said.... then I suppose I was. :idunno:

 

[quip]

:mock: Stripe :mock: Quip.

 

[quip]

Law enforcement, enforcing unconstitutional laws.

Is it "constitutional" to own a tank...why or why not?

 

[Idolater]

Is it "constitutional" to own a tank...why or why not?

You can have a tank. You might have to work with ATF.

 

[ok doser]

I CAN'T!
The mean ol' Government won't let me!!

You can own a tank

 

[quip]

You can have a tank. You might have to work with ATF.

Of course I know you know I'm referring to private ownership. Do civillians have a constitutional right to private ownership of (fully functional) tanks? Why or why not?

 

[ok doser]

You can have a tank. You might have to work with ATF.

Only if you want fully functioning weaponry

 

[ok doser]

Do civillians have a constitutional right to private ownership of (fully functional) tanks?

Of course

 

[ok doser]

Did civilians in the 1790s have the constitutional right to own ships fully armed with cannon?

 

[quip]

Of course

Do tell!

 

[quip]

Did civilians in the 1790s have the constitutional right to own ships fully armed with cannon?

:idunno:

 

[ok doser]

Yes

Yes they did

 

[quip]

Yes

Yes they did

Modern day relevance?

 

[Stripe]

Modern day relevance?

:rotfl:

:mock: Quip.

 

[quip]

:rotfl:

:mock: Quip.

I'll take that as a 'no'.

 

[ok doser]

Modern day relevance?

It was the 18th century's equivalent of a tank :duh:

 

[Idolater]

The murderer in this case was former military, and he used an AR-15.

Except No!

It was a pistol.