do you have a link like this for any other breed?
This idiot needs a little jail time.
- Thread starter The Barbarian
- Start date
do you have a link like this for any other breed?
Not quite. He is Catholic.
More claptrap.:yawn:
Bully-type dogs are not inherently dangerous. Period. That you don't know what you're talking about isn't surprising. I don't think I've ever once seen you and your bizarre haikuesque posts come down on the right side of any issue no matter how big or small.
Okay, somebody define what a "pitbull" is. I'll wait. (Spoiler alert: We're not talking about one breed, the definition can be subjective, and so forth.)
The issue's compounded by virtually any dog involved in a mauling being automatically identified as a pit. Misidentification is a serious and ongoing problem.
Bottom line: They're not inherently dangerous dogs, and the cop's actions are inexcusable.
The issue's compounded by virtually any dog involved in a mauling being automatically identified as a pit. Misidentification is a serious and ongoing problem.
Bottom line: They're not inherently dangerous dogs, and the cop's actions are inexcusable.
Breed Misidentification Propaganda Explained
http://blog.dogsbite.org/2014/01/2013-fatal-dog-attack-identification-photographs.html
I dont agree at all that they are not quite dangerous dogs for the most part, but i do agree that the cops actions were wrong. I don't understand why the animal control services weren't called out to contain them instead.
Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
While I wait for a barbarian to respond to this post, showing the folowers of the thread where in the video said pit bull's tail was wagging and she was acting in a friendly manner:
It just so happens that the most recent Youtube video that I posted is from your OP. Now kindly tell the followers of this thread where on the video they can see the dog that was shot (ya know barbarian, it's not nice to refer to the deceased animal as "the dog", how about we give her a name like "Shark Attack Waiting To Happen"?) was wagging her tail and being all friendly towards the officer.
Quote:
I have to wonder why the dog owners waited 2 months to take this to the media?
I figured with Michael Brown getting all of the media coverage in Ferguson MO, the proud owners of "Shark Attack Waiting To Happen" figured they'd have to wait their turn to crucify a police officer.
Quote:
Perhaps the male owner was incarcerated in a correctional facility somewhere in Texas and wasn't immediately available for comment, or maybe he had warrants for his arrest at the time and didn't want the PO-leece coming around again.
Just because gang bangers and drug dealers (as shown in the dogsbite.org link) are predominately the owners of vicious dogs like "Shark Attack Waiting To Happen", doesn't mean that it's owner was one.
I'm sure he works long hours at the local hospital as some kind of surgeon or a rocket scientist of some sort.
While I wait for a barbarian to respond to this post, showing the folowers of the thread where in the video said pit bull's tail was wagging and she was acting in a friendly manner:
It just so happens that the most recent Youtube video that I posted is from your OP. Now kindly tell the followers of this thread where on the video they can see the dog that was shot (ya know barbarian, it's not nice to refer to the deceased animal as "the dog", how about we give her a name like "Shark Attack Waiting To Happen"?) was wagging her tail and being all friendly towards the officer.
Quote:
I have to wonder why the dog owners waited 2 months to take this to the media?
I figured with Michael Brown getting all of the media coverage in Ferguson MO, the proud owners of "Shark Attack Waiting To Happen" figured they'd have to wait their turn to crucify a police officer.
Quote:
Perhaps the male owner was incarcerated in a correctional facility somewhere in Texas and wasn't immediately available for comment, or maybe he had warrants for his arrest at the time and didn't want the PO-leece coming around again.
Just because gang bangers and drug dealers (as shown in the dogsbite.org link) are predominately the owners of vicious dogs like "Shark Attack Waiting To Happen", doesn't mean that it's owner was one.
I'm sure he works long hours at the local hospital as some kind of surgeon or a rocket scientist of some sort.
Based on? Did you review the video that the barbarian posted in his OP? It briefly showed the dog that was shot. People are confusing the dog that was wagging it's tail in the ditch with the dog that had to be put down.
the solution is simple
just shoot a few more
and
maybe the owners will become more responsible
just shoot a few more
and
maybe the owners will become more responsible
I didn't see any of the dogs being aggressive toward the police officer and i think it odd that they didn't have animal control there also, so they could try to contain the animals. Why shoot them instead of containing them? I could understand shooting if they could not be contained or if they were being aggressive, but that isnt shown.
when the police arrived
the first pit bull was controlled by its owner
then
the police looked for the other two
killed the one that was approaching
and
then waited for animal control to get the third one
The officer was calling the one approaching, why didnt he just wait period for animal control to get there?
With all due respect you don't really know what you're talking about when it comes to these dogs. We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.
I understand that Animal Control had been called and was enroute. The bottom line is that the officer had to use his judgment in using deadly force against a vicious animal.
Here's what was linked in the OP. Note that there are two dogs in the ditch, and the 2nd dog, the one that was put down is rarely even seen.
Video footage of both dogs in the ditch is at 1:02 minutes and again at 3:30 minutes. At 3:43 minutes you'll see the dog (briefly) that was put down and it was not the dog that was acting friendly.
Ok now show me what that dog was doing, that it needed to be shot and why the officer couldnt have just waited for animal control, where is the threat?
the officer may have been trying to keep the third one in sight thinking there were 4 to 5 based on what the caller said
you shoot the one approaching wondering where the 4th and 5th ones are
At 3:43 the newsman stated that the officer's report stated that the growling dog was showing it's teeth was going up the hill towards him. That's not shown on the video, as the officers gun is blocking much of the view.
How fast can a charging pit bull move that is 20 or less feet away from it's target? It'll be on it's target within seconds.