Worst Fears Realized: Pfizer mRNA Transcribes into DNA

marke

Well-known member
Both messenger RNA (mRNA) and viral vector COVID-19 vaccines work by delivering instructions (genetic material) to our cells to start building protection against the virus that causes COVID-19.

After the body produces an immune response, it discards all the vaccine ingredients just as it would discard any information that cells no longer need. This process is a part of normal body functioning.

The genetic material delivered by mRNA vaccines never enters the nucleus of your cells, which is where your DNA is kept. Viral vector COVID-19 vaccines deliver genetic material to the cell nucleus to allow our cells to build protection against COVID-19. However, the vector virus does not have the machinery needed to integrate its genetic material into our DNA, so it cannot alter our DNA.

Sadly, the popular narratives being promoted by pharmaceutical companies and the political recipients of their campaign contributions do not tell the truth about the adverse effects of the vaccine.
 

marke

Well-known member
ff, doser and company aren't about to let annoyances like facts and truth damper their vaccine paranoia party, but thanks for pointing that out for others who will see it and reach the same conclusion we have: "Alrighty then."
Facts mare those missing pesky things that are needed to refute the evidence that covid shots do bad things to humans.
 

marke

Well-known member
Take this link and read the middle of the fourth paragraph:

The fact that they are finding the vaccines are ill-affecting healthy organs and they do not know what they need to know to determine if the vaccine alters the DNA in bad ways should be cause for immediate alarm.


In the BNT162b2 toxicity report, no genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies have been provided [26]. Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern if BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects. At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of BNT162b2 on genomic integrity, including whole genome sequencing of cells exposed to BNT162b2, as well as tissues from human subjects who received BNT162b2 vaccination.
 

marke

Well-known member
So you say. Miscarriages occur on a normal basis, with no vaccines involved.
I don't mind if you choose to believe the vaccine had nothing to do with it but you really know nothing of the facts and circumstances. If you support a vaccine that is causing miscarriages without your knowledge then you should be ashamed of yourself.
 

marke

Well-known member
What clinical trials have been conducted on pregnant women after vaccination? Not many, if any. That is not a good basis for declaring that covid vaccines cannot possibly have any harmful effects on pregnant women. This report is not from a clinical trial but it does show the weakness of the data being wrongly used to support the narrative that covid vaccines cannot harm pregnant women.


Spontaneous abortion has been identified as a priority outcome in studies of maternal vaccine safety,4 and concerns regarding risks of spontaneous abortion may be a barrier to vaccination during pregnancy. We present findings from case-control surveillance of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy and spontaneous abortion.

Several limitations should be noted. First, gestational age of spontaneous abortions and ongoing pregnancies were not chart confirmed; pregnancy dating may be inaccurate early in pregnancy. Second, although vaccination status was identified using multiple data sources, the COVID-19 vaccine rollout has been complex and some vaccines may have been missed, potentially biasing findings to the null. Third, data on important confounders, such as prior pregnancy history, were not available. Fourth, it was not possible to assess risks specific to the Ad26.COV.2.S vaccine given the small number of exposures. Despite limitations, these data can be used to inform vaccine recommendations and to counsel patients.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Lipkind reported serving on the Pfizer independent external data monitoring committee for the COVID-19 vaccine. Dr Naleway reported receiving research funding from Pfizer for an unrelated study. Dr Vesco reported receiving research funding from Pfizer for an unrelated study. No other disclosures were reported.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
"[O]ur findings suggest that the risk of spontaneous abortion after mRNA Covid-19 vaccination either before conception or during pregnancy is consistent with the expected risk of spontaneous abortion; these findings add to the accumulating evidence about the safety of mRNA Covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy."


"A COVID-19 vaccine was received within 28 days prior to an index date among 8.0% of ongoing pregnancy periods vs 8.6% of spontaneous abortions (Table 1). Spontaneous abortions did not have an increased odds of exposure to a COVID-19 vaccination in the prior 28 days compared with ongoing pregnancies."

 

marke

Well-known member
"[O]ur findings suggest that the risk of spontaneous abortion after mRNA Covid-19 vaccination either before conception or during pregnancy is consistent with the expected risk of spontaneous abortion; these findings add to the accumulating evidence about the safety of mRNA Covid-19 vaccination in pregnancy."


"A COVID-19 vaccine was received within 28 days prior to an index date among 8.0% of ongoing pregnancy periods vs 8.6% of spontaneous abortions (Table 1). Spontaneous abortions did not have an increased odds of exposure to a COVID-19 vaccination in the prior 28 days compared with ongoing pregnancies."

Allow me to quote:

... data to inform estimates of the risk of spontaneous abortion after receipt of an mRNA Covid-19 vaccine either before conception (30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period through 14 days after) or during pregnancy are limited.

The pharmaceutical companies and their lackeys in government are claiming there is no increased risk of miscarriage among those getting the covid vaccine in spite of the fact big pharma did no studies of the side effects of the vaccine on pregnant women - hence the admission the data is limited.
 

marke

Well-known member
Ohhh, that sounds spooky!

If only it were true, because Lord knows most people would stand to benefit hugely from a DNA upgrade.
Maybe that is why bozos like Bill Gates have invested so much money into the new vaccine that alters the human DNA.
 
Top