Of course you just ignored the words of the Lord Jesus which I quoted at John 6:47 and John 5:24. Why is that? Why did you just ignore the verses which I quoted which demonstrate that the Jews who lived under the law were born again by the word of God and the word of God alone?
Do you not even realize that no one was saved by keeping the law?:
"Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin" (Ro.3:20).
"I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain" (Gal.2:1).
The Lord Jesus answered in the way that He did in order that the young man would realize his sinfulness and need of a Savior. He should have realized that if he really kept the law he would follow what the Lord said about it and give his money to those in need:
"Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets" (Mt.22:37-40).
Again, here are the words of the Savior Himself spoken to the Jews who lived under the law and of course you just ignored it:
"Very truly I tell you, the one who believes has eternal life" (Jn.6:47).
Of course you just ignored the following verse also:
"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life" (Jn.3:16).
First of all, you ignored the verse which I quoted from the first chapter of the book of James where it is plain that the new birth is a result of faith and faith alone:
"He chose to give us birth through the word of truth, that we might be a kind of firstfruits of all he created" (Jas.1:18).
Secondly, James makes it clear that he is writing about what a man may know about another man's faith:
"Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works" (Jms.2:18).
Charles C. Baker and Cornelius Stam established the Milwaukee Bible Institute, and Baker understood that Abraham was not justified by "works" in the eyes of God, writing that "James speaks of Abraham being justified by works 'when he offered up his son Isaac', which happened 49 years after his justification by faith as mentioned by Paul (Genesis 15:6; Genesis 22). Paul makes it plain in Romans 4:1 and 2 that the justification by works of which James speaks, was not a justification before God, and James states that it was the fulfilling of the faith which he already had (James 2:23). Grace is the source of justification (Romans 3:24); Christ's blood is the ground (Romans 5:9); faith is the means (Romans 3:28); and works are the evidence (James 2:21). As the tree must have life before it can bear fruit; so Abraham received life when justified by faith alone, and 49 years later that faith bore the fruit, of which James speaks" [emphasis added] (Baker, HOW WAS ABRAHAM JUSTIFIED BY WORKS?).
Sir Robert Anderson writes, "Paul's Epistle (Romans) unfolds the mind and purposes of God, revealing His righteousness and wrath. The Epistle of James addresses men upon their own ground. The one deals with justification as between the sinner and God, the other as between man and man. In the one, therefore, the word is, 'To him that worketh not, but believeth'. In the other it is, 'What is the profit if a man say he hath faith, and have not works?' Not 'If a man have faith', but 'If a man say he hath faith' proving that, in the case supposed, the individual is not dealing with God, but arguing the matter with his brethren. God, who searches the heart, does not need to judge by works, which are but the outward manifestation of faith within; but man can judge only by appearances...He (Abraham) was justified by faith when judged by God, for God knows the heart. He was justified by works when judged by his fellow men, for man can only read the life " [emphasis added] (Anderson, The Gospel and Its Ministry, [Kregel Publications, 1978], pp.160-161).
With that in mind we can understand the following verse is saying that Abraham was justified before the Lord by his "faith" and he was justified before man by his "works":
"Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only" (Jms.2:24).
I did not ignore anything but instead I addressed both. It is you who ignored the words of the Lord Jesus spoken to the Jews who lived under the law:
"Very truly I tell you, the one who believes has eternal life" (Jn.6:47).
"Very truly I tell you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be judged but has crossed over from death to life" (Jn.5:24).
We also know that those who believed enjoyed eternal security:
"For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life" (Jn.3:16).
You call yourself a Christian but from what I can see the words of the Lord Jesus Christ spoken to the Jews who lived under the law have no place in your heart. If these verses are not saying that the Jews who lived under the law were saved by faith alone then they must have another meaning.
What is your interpretation of the meaning of His words, Clete? Or are you just going to ignore them again like you did the last time?
As predicted.
Jerry is one of the longest standing members of my ignore list and posts like the one quoted above are the reason why.
Do you see [MENTION=16603]turbosixx[/MENTION]? This is the sort of convoluted mess one can get into with the bottom up/proof-texting method of biblical exegesis. When you start with a doctrine and force the text to agree, no doctrine can be falsified.
Jesus directly answered the question "How can I aquire eternal life?" by telling the one who asked to obey the ten commandments and James explicitly states that "a man is JUSTIFIED BY WORKS and not by faith only". You just cannot possibly get any more blatanly explicit than that and yet it doesn't move Jerry one single centimeter away from his pet doctrine. If anything it cements him further into his gross error.
Clete