TweetyBird
New member
More like shooting down your sacred cows :Grizzly: :cow:
ECT Why I Stopped Thinking Acts 3:19-21 Were Futurist
- Thread starter Interplanner
- Start date
More like shooting down your sacred cows :Grizzly: :cow:
You WOULD get that much...right :chuckle:
Hi and the only thing sacred to me is the bible RIGHTLY DIVIDED or Nothing will do !!
If you new about the GAP between Gen1:1 and 2 you will tells us what it is !!
You call it a Theory and look forward to your LIGHT !!
DAN P
Last edited:
Interplanner
Well-known member
The expression about dividing had to do with what to say in various church leadership situations. It was not about D'ism, or had anything to do with 2P2P which is not in the Bible.
The relation between Gen 1:1 and 2 is first a literary question. Do you want to go into that? If so, make a new thread, not here. The title for this thread is in your address bar...
The relation between Gen 1:1 and 2 is first a literary question. Do you want to go into that? If so, make a new thread, not here. The title for this thread is in your address bar...
You have just revealed once more why you do not know of what you speak on that issue.
For you just now contradicted yourself...
You see this that you said - "The expression about dividing had to do with what to say in various church leadership situations."
What you actually said, oblivious to your having done so, is this - The expression about dividing had to do with [dividing between] what to say in various [different] church leadership situations.
You asserted the very thing you have consistently denied - that the passage is reffering to a need for a distinction between things...that differ from one another.
Talk about the bliss of ignorance to the obvious.
Interplanner
Well-known member
NO, it is not about various gospels, ages, messiahs, ethnes, races.
He was talkign about the argumentative person out of Judaism. It is more likely he was speaking AGAINST division lines like D'ism cooked up.
The D'ists who made the phrase apply to doing D'ism were infected with making the Bible fit 2P2P.
Last edited:
Interplanner
Well-known member
You could however, take up a real question like STP's or GM's limiting the 'shadow vs reality' of Heb 10 so that it doesn't 'touch' prophecy. lol, that's about as arbitrary and artificial as it gets. Meanwhile the PROPHECY of the new covenant is right there being exegeted by the writer right in front of their faces. So they say what they are reading their is ONLY for Jews and is about things X000 years from that time.
And because the 'set aside' language is there, they are adamant that it has not been (set aside).
Modern Bible study!
And because the 'set aside' language is there, they are adamant that it has not been (set aside).
Modern Bible study!
Again, bro - Every once in a while; try going up one more level of abstraction...
Interplanner
Well-known member
My apology: I had a domestic topic list in mind, from I Tim 4. I edited the above post. No, in 'rightly handle' he was more likely speaking against rancid Judaism which thought up divisions like D'ism. And avoiding them.
The other passages that organize the major themes of the Bible do have a scheme to them ,but it is not 2P2P and I don't understand why you can't see that. They do not go that direction, they do not break your brain trying to have things go multi directions at once. They are harmonious, unified, coherent. And like 2 Tim 2:8 JUST SAID: the resurrection and the enthronement on David's throne ARE THE SAME THING!!!
That's just 10 verses back. But so 'awful' that the average Judaizer wanted to destroy it by arguing, arguing, arguing about terminology.
TweetyBird
New member
It's not my theory. I think it's stupid. :kookoo:
Hi and just prove it STUPID and you say it si just a Theory , should be easy for you !!
I do not debate Gen 1:1-2 , because I will have to study up a STUPID THEORY !!
So try if you want to AND stop calling it STUPID
dan p
TweetyBird
New member
It's stupid. I can say it again if you want, or maybe you would prefer, ignorant? :dunce: I don't want to talk about it either. You seem to have an affinity for Gap theories, so have fun with it.
Interplanner
Well-known member
There are simple literary issues in Gen 1:1 & 2 to bear in mind.
TweetyBird
New member
Literary issues?
Hi and I mentioned all the Gaps in the bible OFF the top of my head and then you were the one who called it STUPID , and since you can debate it YOUR STUPID is STUPID , there that looks better !!
It looks like the Interplanner more than what you call STUPID !!
dan p
Interplanner
Well-known member
In another thread. this one is about Acts 3. Of course we could talk about Japanese knives while we are trying other topics, too.
Interplanner
Well-known member
The section titles of Moses writing
The section titles of Moses writing
(other thread)
The section titles of Moses writing
(other thread)