Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 5

[aCultureWarrior]

Let's see what the policy of the week is for allowing gender confused men and women to serve in the military under rainbow flag waver Donald Trump:

Trump orders ban on most transgender troops...

March 23, 2018

In a presidential memorandum on Friday, President Donald Trump banned some transgender service members from serving in the U.S. military, saying transgender individuals “with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria” are unable to serve except under limited circumstances...

“Among other things, the policies set forth by the Secretary of Defense state that transgender persons with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria -- individuals who the policies state may require substantial medical treatment, including medications and surgery -- are disqualified from military service except under certain limited circumstances,” Trump wrote in a statement released by the White House.

In a memo to Trump dated Feb. 22, Secretary of Defense James Mattis — citing a panel of expert’s “professional military judgment” and his own professional judgment — recommended the following three policies with which Trump concurred:
1. “Transgender person with a history or diagnosis of gender dysphoria are disqualified from military service, except under the following circumstances: (1) if they have been stable for 36 consecutive months in their biological sex prior to our accession; (2) Servicemembers diagnosed with gender dysphoria after entering into service may be retained if they do not require a change of gender and remain deployable with an applicable retention standards; and (3) currently serving service members who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria since the previous administration’s policy took effect and prior to the effective date of this new policy, may continue to serve in their preferred gender and receive medically necessary treatment for gender dysphoria.”

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trum...r-troops-final-policy-rests/story?id=53963411

Most or some, which is it?

More importantly there is no mention that these lost souls are in desperate need of spiritual and psychological help to overcome their gender and sexual confusion.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

While I won't cover the entire interview of SMUT star Stormy Daniels talking about her "consensual" (if it's consensual it must be ok, right Libertarians?) extra martial affair with Donald Trump 12 years ago, I would like to discuss a couple of things:

Five takeaways from Stormy Daniels’ big interview

3-25-18

The controversy over President Trump's alleged affair with Stormy Daniels reached new heights on Sunday evening when CBS's "60 Minutes" broadcast an interview with the adult actress.
Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, detailed the sexual liaison she says she had with Trump in 2006.
The White House has said that Daniels and other women who have made allegations about Trump's behavior - allegations that range all the way from consensual extramarital sex to sexual assault - are lying.
What were the main takeaways from the Daniels interview?

1. It's deeply embarrassing - and tawdry - for Trump

...Daniels said she asked Trump to take his pants down so she could spank him with a magazine with his face on the cover - and that he did so...

Another eyebrow-raising detail is Daniels' contention that Trump told her "You remind me of my daughter" - presumed to be a reference to Ivanka Trump. Daniels had offered similar recollections to a magazine for a 2011 interview that was not published until earlier this year by In Touch. But "60 Minutes" is a far more prominent platform.
There were also awkward allegations about Trump's marriage to Melania.
At the time of the alleged affair with Daniels, in 2006, Melania had recently given birth to the couple's son, Barron.

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...els’-big-interview/ar-BBKHtkE?ocid=spartanntp

Psychologists should have fun with Donald Trump wanting to be spanked with a magazine that had his picture on the cover.

Of course the incestuous fixation that Trump has with his daughter isn't anything new, as he openly talked about it several years back.

In the words of the late zoo22:

"Creepy".

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Peter LaBarbera of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality writes some pretty good stuff. I've used his articles throughout this 5 part thread. Every once in awhile I have to point out when he messes up, like writing an article making pro homosexual, pro abortion, Libertarian John Stossel to be some kind of hero for standing up against the Southern Poverty Law Center.
https://americansfortruth.com/2018/...uthern-poverty-law-center-splc-as-hate-group/

Recently LaBarbera has given accolades to Faux News correspondent Tucker Carlson:
https://americansfortruth.com/2018/...or-ideological-warfare-against-conservatives/

I'd pointed out back in Part 4 that Carlson is yet another Libertarian pretending to be a conservative, as he was a senior fellow with the Cato Institute, focusing on libertarian philosophy and the American polity.

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4986250&viewfull=1#post4986250
https://www.cato.org/people/tucker-carlson

Libertarian Tucker Carlson of Faux News

I'll be back with another AFTAH article giving accolades to Mike Pence and show the real truth about LGBT flag waver Donald Trump's right hand man.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Back to critiquing some articles by Peter LaBarbera of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (I'm wondering if LaBarbera has made his AFTAH website a pro Republican Party website instead of one that tells the truth and nothing but the truth?).

On the AFTAH website LaBarbera has 3 recent articles defending Vice President Mike Pence. I'll address the following words from one of the articles where author Micah Clark of the AFA Indiana stated this:

"I don’t know much about Mike Pence. I can’t speak to the earnestness of his religious convictions or the consistency with which he carries them out. Nobody can, aside from Pence himself and God Almighty. But I do know that the things about Pence which have attracted so much scorn and ridicule — his views on homosexuality and abortion, primarily — are 100-percent pure Christianity. You cannot be a Christian and hold a different view on these topics. And you cannot hate every Christian who holds those views without hating every real Christian in the world."
https://americansfortruth.com/2018/...out-lefts-vile-hostility-toward-christianity/

You really shouldn't defend someone who you admit that you "don't know much about" Mr. Clark. It just so happens that I've done some extensive research on Vice President Mike Pence and his supposed "100% pure Christianity".

Let's start off with when as Governor of Indiana he cowered in the face of the LGBTQ movement and not only abandoned Christians who stand up for God's Word, but abandoned God Himself:

Amid Controversy, Pence Backs Down on Anti-Gay Law

March 31, 2015

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence (R) said Tuesday that he wanted to see legislation on his desk this week clarifying that the controversial religious freedom bill he signed into law did not allow businesses to deny service to anyone.

Pence made the announcement at a widely televised press conference the same day that the Indianapolis Star ran a front-page editorial urging state lawmakers to change the legislation.
“After much reflection and in consultation with leadership of the General Assembly I’ve come to the conclusion that it would be helpful to move legislation this week that makes it clear that this law does not give businesses to deny services to anyone,” Pence said at a press conference on Tuesday. “Let me say that again. I think it would be helpful and I’d like to see on my desk before the end of this week legislation that is added to the Religious Freedom Restoration Act that makes it clear that this law does not deny services against anyone.”

...Asked if it should be legal in Indiana to discriminate against gays or lesbians, Pence said he didn’t agree with any kind of discrimination.
“I don’t support discrimination against gays, or lesbians of anyone else. I abhor discrimination. I want to say this: No one should be harassed or mistreated because of who they are, who they love, or what they believe,” Pence said.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/mike-pence-wants-clarification-law

Read more on Mike Pence's phony Christianity/conservatism here:
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4852701&viewfull=1#post4852701

Know you know more about Mike Pence, Mr. Clark.

 

[MrDante]

Peter LaBarbera of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality writes some pretty good stuff.

Yes he has a gift for fiction

 

[Rusha]

While I won't cover the entire interview of SMUT star Stormy Daniels talking about her "consensual" (if it's consensual it must be ok, right Libertarians?) extra martial affair with Donald Trump 12 years ago, I would like to discuss a couple of things:.

Legal and consensual doesn't always mean *ok*. Even though I don't care for Melania, she is a victim in this situation Also, she did NOT consent to being cheated on.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Peter LaBarbera of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality writes some pretty good stuff.

Yes he has a gift for fiction

I called LaBarbera out on failing to expose the real Mike Pence and will do so later in another one of his articles.

Don't cha just hate it when people are interested in the truth and don't play partisan politics?

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
While I won't cover the entire interview of SMUT star Stormy Daniels talking about her "consensual" (if it's consensual it must be ok, right Libertarians?) extra martial affair with Donald Trump 12 years ago, I would like to discuss a couple of things:...

Legal and consensual doesn't always mean *ok*. Even though I don't care for Melania, she is a victim in this situation Also, she did NOT consent to being cheated on.

You are correct. When it comes to human sexuality, anything outside of one man and one woman united in matrimony is not "ok".

I posted excerpts from an article on the limits of consent in Part 4 a couple of times. It's well worth posting it again. Feel free to critique it if you can.


The limits of consent

Consent only has value when it is based on knowledge of what is truly good for us.

Oct. 1, 2015

Earlier this year, an article in New York Magazine featured a story involving an eighteen-year-old woman who plans to marry and have children with her father. When the interviewer asked her to respond to those who might question her relationship, she offered the following reply:


I just don’t understand why I’m judged for being happy. We are two adults who brought each other out of dark places ... When you are 18 you know what you want. You’re an adult under the law and you’re able to consent.

Her reasoning is typical of contemporary liberal approaches to sexual morality, which are usually justified by appealing to mutual consent. So long as an activity is performed in private between consenting adults, it is argued, there can be nothing inherently objectionable about what they do. Why? Because they have given their consent, and consent is what matters most when it comes to one’s decision to engage in sexual activity.

The implications of this position are far-reaching. Many have invoked the consent principle to argue for the permissibility of polyamory and consensual incest. Once we view the morality of sex as being determined only by mutual agreement, then it becomes very hard to make any principled distinctions about the shape of sexual relationships.

When Consent Goes Wrong

There are a number of problems with this way of understanding sex. The most obvious problem with basing sexual morality on consent is that we can consent to things that are bad for us. Here we need only to think of those who deliberately cut themselves, desire the amputation of a healthy limb, or intentionally neglect their own health. These persons may have consented to engage in these activities, but their exercise of autonomy is nevertheless bad and self-destructive. So the mere fact that we may agree to do something does not show that what we are doing is morally permissible.

The defender of liberal sexual morality might respond by making a distinction between consent and informed consent. The self-harmer may choose to engage in these activities, but he does so without the full knowledge and understanding of the self-destructive effects that accompany them. If he really knew what he were about to do, then things might have turned out differently.

But this response is problematic for a number of reasons. If informed consent is just a matter of knowing the risks of one’s actions, then it is quite conceivable that someone may still freely choose to pursue self-destructive actions, having understood and accepted the risks. Yet there still seems to be something deeply wrong with a person who chooses to engage in self-destructive activities, even if he understands the risks of what he is doing...


The Purpose of Freedom Sexual liberalism’s misguided view of consent is a symptom of a deeper problem: we have forgotten what it means to be free. Our power of free choice, like the rest of our nature, has a purpose. The point of freedom is not to choose whatever we want, but to choose only those ends that are in accordance with our rational human nature. It is this exercise of freedom that gives rise to self-mastery. This classical understanding of freedom was best expressed by Samuel West, in a sermon delivered to the Massachusetts legislature in 1776:

The most perfect freedom consists in obeying the dictates of right reason, and submitting to natural law. When a man goes beyond or contrary to the law of nature and reason, he becomes the slave of base passions and vile lusts; he introduces confusion and disorder into society, and brings misery and destruction upon himself. This, therefore, cannot be called a state of freedom, but a state of the vilest slavery and the most dreadful bondage. The servants of sin and corruption are subjected to the worst kind of tyranny in the universe. Hence we conclude that where licentiousness begins, liberty ends...


We must first look to human nature and understand the goods that fulfill it. Only then can we really understand what it means to be free. Appeals to consent, autonomy, liberty, and harm all rest on moral assumptions that need to be justified. While conservatives have offered powerful defenses of their moral assumptions, this task has been ignored by defenders of liberal sexual morality.

Read more: http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ized!-Part-4&p=4472325&viewfull=1#post4472325
https://www.mercatornet.com/articles/view/the-limits-of-consent

 

[aCultureWarrior]

I ran across this video of Kentucky Governor Matt Bevin talking about school shootings. As it's been shown throughout this 5 part thread, we're living in a culture of death with abortion, pornography, homosexuality, assisted suicide, recreational drug use and violent so-called 'entertainment' being embraced by a good portion of our society.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6XTVuUP0Ho

Next up: The lesbian spokesperson behind the anti gun movement.

 

[Rusha]

You are correct. When it comes to human sexuality, anything outside of one man and one woman united in matrimony is not "ok".

We will have to agree to disagree on this issue. Your viewpoint stems from your personal understanding of your religion, and mine is based on personal experience and empathy. I am capable of showing empathy for Melania because she was treated cruelly, and it's not the way a husband or wife should treat one another OR the example that should be set for their children.

Consent is the basis of whether or not something is forcefully abusive. Making laws that confine men and women to spend their lives alone or in a loveless marriage is demoralizing and harmful to those in such relationships.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
You are correct. When it comes to human sexuality, anything outside of one man and one woman united in matrimony is not "ok".

We will have to agree to disagree on this issue.

"Agree to disagree" or "agreeing to disagree" is a phrase in English referring to the resolution of a conflict (usually a debate or quarrel) whereby all parties tolerate but do not accept the opposing position(s). It generally occurs when all sides recognise that further conflict would be unnecessary, ineffective or otherwise undesirable. They may also remain on amicable terms while continuing to disagree about the unresolved issues.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agree_to_disagree

I don't tolerate your view on consensual morality, so therefore we don't agree to disagree.

Your viewpoint stems from your personal understanding of your religion, and mine is based on personal experience and empathy. I am capable of showing empathy for Melania because she was treated cruelly, and it's not the way a husband or wife should treat one another OR the example that should be set for their children.

Yes, my viewpoint comes from the Creator of the universe and everything in it who said amongst other things:

"Thou shalt not commit adultery".

You really shouldn't borrow off of God's moral code without giving Him full credit for it Sandy.

Consent is the basis of whether or not something is forcefully abusive.

Abusive is a subjective word. The homosexual who contracts HIV/AIDS and will die decades before he should has abused himself by not seeking spiritual and psychological help out of his 'deathstyle'.

Making laws that confine men and women to spend their lives alone or in a loveless marriage is demoralizing and harmful to those in such relationships.

Yes, life without Christ is demoralizing Sandy. That being said: Jesus does allow those in adulterous marriages a way out though.

"9 I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another woman commits adultery."
Matthew 19: 9

 

[aCultureWarrior]

More from the culture of death:

Family famed for protest photo die when SUV goes off cliff

3-28-18

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A family that gained attention for an emotional photograph of an African-American boy hugging a white police officer at a 2014 protest were killed when their SUV plunged off a scenic California highway, authorities said Wednesday as they asked for help figuring out what happened.
"We have every indication to believe that all six children were in there," Mendocino County Sheriff Tom Allmon said, appealing for tips to retrace where the siblings and two parents had been before the vehicle was found Monday in rocky ocean. "We know that an entire family vanished and perished during this tragedy."
Some friends described married couple Jennifer and Sarah Hart as good parents who took their adopted kids to Bernie Sanders rallies, while some neighbors said they called child welfare officials in their rural Washington state community over concerns about possible abuse or had noticed red flags.
The California Highway Patrol has not determined why the vehicle went off an ocean overlook on a rugged part of coastline. A specialized team of accident investigators was trying to figure that out, Allmon said.
"There were no skid marks, there were no brake marks" at the turnout on the Pacific Coast Highway where the vehicle went over, the sheriff said. Investigators have no reason to believe the crash was intentional, he said.
The 100-foot (31-meter) drop killed the women, both 39, and their children Markis Hart, 19; Jeremiah Hart, 14; and Abigail Hart, 14. Hannah Hart, 16; Devonte Hart, 15; and Sierra Hart, 12, have not been found.
The Harts lived in Woodland, Washington, a small city outside Portland, Oregon, and had a recent visit from Child Protective Services, Clark County sheriff's Sgt. Brent Waddell told The Associated Press.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...suv-goes-off-cliff/ar-BBKMJ2k?ocid=spartandhp

Yet another case of homosexual suicide/murder?

 

[MrDante]

Earlier this year, an article in New York Magazine featured a story involving an eighteen-year-old woman who plans to marry and have children with her father.

heterosexuals are all just perverts

 

[aCultureWarrior]

It's interesting to see how different news organizations report the same story. For instance in the above post MSN's headline made no mention that the women involved in a fatal crash were lesbians (after reading that they were 'married', one could figure it out). MSN also downplayed that there was child abuse allegations reported by the children and neighbors and made no mention of domestic violence charges. Was it murder/suicide or an accident? Did one of the lesbians allow her "anger to get out of control" and purposely drove off of the cliff? The fact is that 6 innocent children are dead because the state allows children to be in the custody of homosexuals.

EXCLUSIVE: How lesbian mother who plunged off Pacific Highway admitted she 'let anger get out of control' after six-year-old daughter told teacher she had ‘owies’ on her tummy and her back after her mommy hit her
Sarah and Jennifer Hart were found dead on Monday alongside three of their six adopted children after their their car plunged off a cliff in Westport, California
Sarah Hart was arrested and charged with misdemeanor domestic assault and malicious punishment of a child December 27, 2010
The assault was against the couple's daughter Abigail, who was six years old at the time and was one of the three children found at the bottom of the cliff
Sarah Hart pleaded guilty to domestic assault, was fined $385 given a 90 day sentence, which was stayed, and placed on one year's supervised probation
Sarah Hart and her wife Jennifer, both 39, had been reported to Child Protective Services days before their deaths for allegedly starving their children
On Monday, the Harts bodies were found at the bottom of a cliff off Highway 1 along with three of their children, Markis, 19; Jeremiah 14; and Abigail, 14
Their children Hannah, 16; Devonte, 15; and Sierra, 12, still have not been found

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rested-ASSAULTING-daughter.html#ixzz5BLIBRrci

Note how the two lesbians had indoctrinated these children into embracing homosexuality.

 

[MrDante]

More from the culture of death:

Family famed for protest photo die when SUV goes off cliff

3-28-18

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — A family that gained attention for an emotional photograph of an African-American boy hugging a white police officer at a 2014 protest were killed when their SUV plunged off a scenic California highway, authorities said Wednesday as they asked for help figuring out what happened.
"We have every indication to believe that all six children were in there," Mendocino County Sheriff Tom Allmon said, appealing for tips to retrace where the siblings and two parents had been before the vehicle was found Monday in rocky ocean. "We know that an entire family vanished and perished during this tragedy."
Some friends described married couple Jennifer and Sarah Hart as good parents who took their adopted kids to Bernie Sanders rallies, while some neighbors said they called child welfare officials in their rural Washington state community over concerns about possible abuse or had noticed red flags.
The California Highway Patrol has not determined why the vehicle went off an ocean overlook on a rugged part of coastline. A specialized team of accident investigators was trying to figure that out, Allmon said.
"There were no skid marks, there were no brake marks" at the turnout on the Pacific Coast Highway where the vehicle went over, the sheriff said. Investigators have no reason to believe the crash was intentional, he said.
The 100-foot (31-meter) drop killed the women, both 39, and their children Markis Hart, 19; Jeremiah Hart, 14; and Abigail Hart, 14. Hannah Hart, 16; Devonte Hart, 15; and Sierra Hart, 12, have not been found.
The Harts lived in Woodland, Washington, a small city outside Portland, Oregon, and had a recent visit from Child Protective Services, Clark County sheriff's Sgt. Brent Waddell told The Associated Press.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/f...suv-goes-off-cliff/ar-BBKMJ2k?ocid=spartandhp

Yet another case of homosexual suicide/murder?

Murder? I'm sure there are many people who wanted this family dead just as there are many people who are joyful that this accident happened and are even now celebrating.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Murder?

Murder/suicide. The evidence is strong.

I'm sure there are many people who wanted this family dead just as there are many people who are joyful that this accident happened and are even now celebrating.

I grieve that innocent children didn't get to live life through a Christian heart and that two women will spend eternity in damnation because they didn't repent and accept Christ as their Lord and Savior.

As far as the LGBTQ movement goes: Just more statistics to add to the death count.

http://obit.glbthistory.org/olo/index.jsp

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Before I talk about the "skin headed lesbian" (who actually is a lesbian) that wants to take more constitutional rights away from American citizens, and then share Part 3 of MassResistance's article on Marquitta Ford who was unjustly arrested for legally protesting against insane laws that allow mentally ill men and women and sexual predators to use the restroom, fitting room and locker room of their choice, I'd like to correct Peter LaBarbera of Americans For Truth on an article that he recently posted.

Staver Commends Trump Memo on Qualified Military Transgender Ban

...“I commend President Trump for refocusing the military’s mission to emphasize readiness and unit cohesion,” said Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel. “The report from the Defense Department concludes that there are substantial risks to military effectiveness and readiness regarding people who have gender dysphoria. The military is not a social club but rather a fine-tuned fighting machine of men and women who defend our freedom. It is not a right but a privilege to serve,” said Staver.
Staver added, “The duty of military officers is to appropriately lead and prepare their personnel to serve and protect, and they cannot do that when there is confusion, dysfunction and distraction.”

Read more: https://americansfortruth.com/2018/...-memo-on-military-transgender-ban/#more-25424

As your article points out Mr. Barbera, not all of those that identify as "transgender" are ineligible to serve in the US military. I should point out that this current administration hasn't done anything to deal with the openly homosexual military personnel either.

It's unfortunate that you didn't post an article by ex transgender Walt Heyer showing the way out of the transgender 'death style' instead of giving accolades to a Republicrat lackey like Mat Staver.

http://waltheyer.com/

Perhaps we should rename your organization "Americans for 'some truth' about Homosexuality" Mr. LaBarbera?

 

[MrDante]

Murder/suicide. The evidence is strong.



I grieve that innocent children didn't get to live life through a Christian heart and that two women will spend eternity in damnation because they didn't repent and accept Christ as their Lord and Savior.

As far as the LGBTQ movement goes: Just more statistics to add to the death count.

http://obit.glbthistory.org/olo/index.jsp

The evidence for murder sure is. Just look at all the death threats that family got.

 

[aCultureWarrior]

Quote: Originally posted by aCultureWarrior
I grieve that innocent children didn't get to live life through a Christian heart and that two women will spend eternity in damnation because they didn't repent and accept Christ as their Lord and Savior.

The evidence for murder sure is. Just look at all the death threats that family got.

In order for people following this thread to "look at all the death threats" the lesbians who adopted and hence indoctrinated innocent children to their immoral lifestyle, you'd have to post some of them. If those threats do exist, I would imagine that they came from people that don't take kindly to adults starving and physically abusing the children that were put into their custody (in this case wrongfully: See 12 Ways Homosexual Adults Endanger Children: https://barbwire.com/2014/06/04/twelve-ways-homosexual-adults-endanger-children/ ).

You are aware that the biggest death threat comes from God Himself aren't you? Since neither proud and unrepentant homosexual repented and accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior so that they could have eternal life, they will be spending eternity in damnation, something that God doesn't want to do, but has to do.

Why is the idea of eternal damnation so repulsive to many people?

https://www.gotquestions.org/eternal-damnation.html

 

[MrDante]

In order for people following this thread to "look at all the death threats" the lesbians who adopted and hence indoctrinated innocent children to their immoral lifestyle, you'd have to post some of them.

you mean like you never do?

Fortunately you can find those threats documented b the Vancouver police. The family notes that the constant barrage of death threat was the reason they moved to Woodland Wa.

f those threats do exist, I would imagine that they came from people that don't take kindly to adults starving and physically abusing the children that were put into their custody (in this case wrongfully:

These kids are starving?

See 12 Ways Homosexual Adults Endanger Children: https://barbwire.com/2014/06/04/twelve-ways-homosexual-adults-endanger-children/ ).

get some new material already. You've been posting stuff like this since at least 2006

You are aware that the biggest death threat comes from God Himself aren't you? Since neither proud and unrepentant homosexual repented and accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior so that they could have eternal life, they will be spending eternity in damnation, something that God doesn't want to do, but has to do.

I don't see God celebrating thedeath of a family, just you