You [Bob] ...do not support the Constitution of your own nation. End of story.
I have to admit that, after listening to the show, I came away with a similar impression. But I would like to see Bob admit or deny that before I judge his position.
It could be that Bob does not see how the Constitution prohibits the emissions of bills of credit and implicitly reserves that right to individuals (and cooperatives of individuals), and that he does not realize that congress cannot delegate certain powers (see delegation law).
I find it hard to believe that he would flagrantly oppose the principles of 1Pe 2:13 and Rom 13:1-2. That he would want a new Constitution is one thing, but for him to defend acts contrary to our existing Constitution as moral would be another. I don't think he would do the latter consciously.