Quetzal
New member
I didn't say they were, you misunderstood. The videos were presented to try to prove the actions PP were taking were illegal. That is the topic at hand.
Undercover Planned Parenthood Videos Were Altered, Analysis Finds
- Thread starter Quetzal
- Start date
- Status
jeffblue101
New member
Its totally ridiculous to dismiss hours of video tape over bathroom breaks that CMP has already gave to congress.
Quetzal
New member
They can (and will) be dismissed if conclusive evidence is presented that they were tampered and edited to the point of inaccuracy.
jeffblue101
New member
What exactly could have happened in a 5 to 30 minute break that warrants throwing out all the of recorded footage. What, did David Daleidan pull out a gun and pistol whip PP excutives to force them to admit to profiteering
jeffblue101
New member
Its amazing how fast and how much coverage this report by PP received in the left wing media but barely any coverage at a snail's pace when the videos where released by same left wing media
This I do understand. Thanks
jeffblue101
New member
The videos were edited? No way!:shocked::jawdrop:
Jose Fly
New member
This oughta put to rest the questions regarding the accuracy of these videos.
CLICK HERE to see the original report from the analysis of the video (PDF).
Remember the "it's a baby" statement from the PP employee? Fake.
"In our view, CMP created the purported statement, “it’s a baby,”
either through transcription error or intentional fabrication."
Other key findings...
Oh, and the person who investigated these videos? That would be "Grant Fredericks who is a contract instructor of video sciences at the FBI National Academy and one of the most experienced video experts in North America."
CLICK HERE to see the original report from the analysis of the video (PDF).
Remember the "it's a baby" statement from the PP employee? Fake.
"In our view, CMP created the purported statement, “it’s a baby,”
either through transcription error or intentional fabrication."
Other key findings...
Collectively, the five videotapes of Planned Parenthood staff have at least 42 splices where content is cut and edited together to make it appear to be a seamless conversation.
In some cases, these splices completely change the meaning of statements. On one video, a Planned Parenthood staff member’s remarks about lab protocols were edited to make it sound like she was talking about changing abortion procedures. Phrases on the tape were isolated and removed, stringing together unrelated sentences to change the meaning.
Anti-abortion activists used the doctored “quote” to support false claims that she was talking about changing how an abortion would be done, and the “quote” was published by mainstream media as if it were real.
On one tape, a Planned Parenthood staff member in Colorado says 13 separate times that any arrangements related to fetal tissue donation need to be reviewed by attorneys and follow all laws—and all 13 are edited out of the video.
On another tape, a Planned Parenthood staff member in Texas says nine separate times that there is no “profit” related to fetal tissue donation—and all nine are edited out of the video.
In some cases, these splices completely change the meaning of statements. On one video, a Planned Parenthood staff member’s remarks about lab protocols were edited to make it sound like she was talking about changing abortion procedures. Phrases on the tape were isolated and removed, stringing together unrelated sentences to change the meaning.
Anti-abortion activists used the doctored “quote” to support false claims that she was talking about changing how an abortion would be done, and the “quote” was published by mainstream media as if it were real.
On one tape, a Planned Parenthood staff member in Colorado says 13 separate times that any arrangements related to fetal tissue donation need to be reviewed by attorneys and follow all laws—and all 13 are edited out of the video.
On another tape, a Planned Parenthood staff member in Texas says nine separate times that there is no “profit” related to fetal tissue donation—and all nine are edited out of the video.
Oh, and the person who investigated these videos? That would be "Grant Fredericks who is a contract instructor of video sciences at the FBI National Academy and one of the most experienced video experts in North America."
If they were edited out of the video how did the analysts know?
Jose Fly
New member
Read the report. Some of their findings are about footage from the "full videos" (which we now know weren't) that didn't make it into the shorter ones, and other findings are about segments that are missing from the "full videos".
The things missing from the shorter versions that are in the longer versions are moot because they are in the longer versions. And the analysts don't know what's missing from the longer versions, so this is a non-story.
Jose Fly
New member
The other thing the found is that in the video where all those graphic descriptions of body parts and stuff was going on during the procedure, that was because the CMP operatives were constantly asking the PP employees to describe it all. IOW, they were baiting them to generate the "Eww gross" factor.
Jose Fly
New member
Really? So the PP people say over and over and over "We have to follow the law", "We can't agree to anything until our attorneys approve", and "we can't profit from this", yet somehow those didn't make it into any of the shorter videos, which are what the vast majority of people watched...
....and to you that's a "non-story"?
Your tribalism is showing. :down:
jeffblue101
New member
false dichotomy, CMP transcribed from raw footage not the youtube footage also they were eye witnesses to all the conversations as well and lets not forget another boy which was screeched with delight.
Jose Fly
New member
And the review found many (~4,000) problems with the transcriptions as well.
Um......so?
And........?
That - they said what they said, not hard to understand.
To even be able to say "normal" with the words thrown in the trash talking about a baby, says much is wrong with you.
No wonder you see no problem here, you are as messed up as they are.
Its everything but normal.
Jose Fly
New member
Except for the times they didn't, or the times they said things CMP didn't want them to say (we follow the law, our attorneys have to approve, we can't profit) and they just happened to end up on the cutting room floor.
Pure coincidence.....
Except for the times they didn't, or the times they said things CMP didn't want them to say (we follow the law, our attorneys have to approve, we can't profit) and they just happened to end up on the cutting room floor.
Pure coincidence.....
Even with that stuff, it wouldn't change what they said and the callousness of what they said.
Kind of like admitting to a crime and then giving a caveat, like "this is off the record, right"
They said what they said, no one forced it out of them or changed the IMMEDIATE context of what they said in any way.
- Status