Your bizarre "interp" requires that EVERY passage reiterate ALL details? I guess that you want a Bible that takes a semi truck to haul around.
Yes, it does: http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ave-To-David&p=4889481&viewfull=1#post4889481The problem of course is that none of the NT passages about it in normal language have any Judaic detail. Including the fact that 'saved' in Rom 11 is not about a theocracy in Judea. 'Saved' always means justification from sins in Romans or side-effects of justification.
Yes, it does: http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ave-To-David&p=4889481&viewfull=1#post4889481
No, the word "saved" means whatever it means in the CONTEXT in which it is used. Just like ALL of the English language which you, apparently, do not understand.
Luke 1:67-75 (AKJV/PCE)(1:67) And his father Zacharias was filled with the Holy Ghost, and prophesied, saying, (1:68) Blessed [be] the Lord God of Israel; for he hath visited and redeemed his people, (1:69) And hath raised up an horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant David; (1:70) As he spake by the mouth of his holy prophets, which have been since the world began: (1:71) That we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us; (1:72) To perform the mercy [promised] to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant; (1:73) The oath which he sware to our father Abraham, (1:74) That he would grant unto us, that we being delivered out of the hand of our enemies might serve him without fear, (1:75) In holiness and righteousness before him, all the days of our life.THAT "saved" in verse 71 is talking about being delivered from their enemies, just like it confirms in verse 74.
You are just a one trick pony that does NOT listen to ANYTHING that anyone but YOURSELF says.I know that about context which is why I said it. Paul said it was justification.
Where is the throne of His father David?He says nothing about a Davidic theocracy. He said it was what the New covenant would bring, which is the righteousness of God. He said sins would be taken away, the same expression the Baptiser used, and he said it would turn them from sin, and the sin was asserting their own justification.
DingleBerry, you think that this PROPHECY reported by an angel of the Lord was "in a poem or song".You have no answers and I'm not sure you know the questions.
That's why you go to somewhere in Luke in a poem or song instead of the immediate passages mentioned because you can't stand specfics.
You are just a one trick pony that does NOT listen to ANYTHING that anyone bur YOURSELF says.
Quit trying to change the subject. In Luke 1:71-74 "saved" has NOTHING to do with justification, not like YOU say that saved ALWAYS means justification.
Just proves that you have no understanding of even simple things, let alone anything beyond that.
Where is the throne of His father David?
Was that angel of the Lord incorrect?
No, it is YOU that is incorrect.
Is this another one of your Cancelationist "interp"?
DingleBerry, you think that this PROPHECY reported by an angel of the Lord was "in a poem or song".
You are as dumb as a box of rocks. Quit embarrassing yourself and leave this site permanently.
You changed locations from ROm 11 to Luke, but the point about Luke was that it is a song, not a doctrinal passage like Gal 3.
No idea what you're talking about.You're right about the song; I was referring to either of the two.
No, I let the Bible define it. You have a mythological meaning for it which is made up.You have a preset meaning for the throne of David.
Bogus man-made nonsense.It is the same as Judaism's at the time. Christ superceded that. such as in the opening of John: 'tear down this temple and I will rebuild it in 3 days.' It is all through John and the NT, once your eyes are open to IN CHRIST.
Once again, where do you get this "song" nonsense? Narrative?Eph 1-3 is mostly doctrinal passage. Not a song or two like Lk 1-2, in which the rest is narrative anyway.
WOW, and THIS coming from a guy that can't stop telling us about the NEW HEAVEN and the NEW EARTH!If you want dumb questions try this one: why don't you answer why Christ's 'how can (Christ) be his son?' changed the view of Judaism forever?
Or, 'he will reign on his throne forever' yet the earth is consumed in fire at the end of time.
The throne of David never means a Davidic theocracy on earth in the NT.
Let us look at the Lord's promises made to David in regard to that throne and kingdom:
"I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build an house for my name, and I will stablish the throne of his kingdom for ever...And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever" (2 Sam.7:12-13).
We can know that this throne of David is an earthly throne because Solomon sat upon that throne on the earth:
"Then sat Solomon upon the throne of David his father; and his kingdom was established greatly" (1 Ki. 2:12).
We also know that the Lord will not "alter" the promises which He made to David:
"I have made a covenant with my chosen, I have sworn unto David my servant...Nevertheless my loving-kindness will I not utterly take from him, nor suffer my faithfulness to fail. My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips. Once have I sworn by my holiness that I will not lie unto David" (Ps.89:3,33-35)
Since the Lord will not "alter" the promises which He made to David we can know that this passage from the NT is referring to the Lord Jesus'eartly throne:
"He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end" (Lk.1:32,33).
The following prophecy foretells of the time when the lord Jesus will reign from His earthly throne:
"Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth" (Jer.23:5).
Since you have no place in your eschatology for these things happening you must somehow pervert what all of these verses say!