To The Religious Right: Get Tough With G.W. Bush Or Apologize To Bill Clinton

[drbrumley]

The "choices," so called, will be even more blatantly worse.

And a "choice" between two Bonesmen is no kind of choice at all. This is precisely why I don't vote: it's the same basic "choice" a john has when he walks into a brothel. Blond, or brunette?

Or you can just not go into the brothel at all.

"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can throw the rascals out at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy. Then it should be possible to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which will be none of these things but will still pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies."

Carroll Quigley

 

[drbrumley]

A vote in 2000 for Bush was actually a vote for Gore also.

A vote in 2004 for Bush was actually a vote for kerry also.