The Trinity

The Trinity


  • Total voters
    121

popsthebuilder

New member
I can wave around my Bible too. Why should I take your non-authoritative opinion on what the Bible means, or Gt's, as the truth? When it conflicts with what the Church's magisterium says about it? When I weigh the magisterium's authority and the authority of anonymous user accounts on TOL, what would compel me to side with the latter, in interpreting Sacred Scripture?

The Church teaches all about sin. She's got that subject nailed. I've no reason to listen to what anyone else is saying about sin. I can, and do, trust the authority of the Church herself, that Jesus built, which has been preserved in particular, with its lineage of popes from back to Peter, and their infallible doctrines in matters of faith and morals.







Sent from my
I tell you what; you follow the greedy inclinations of prideful men known to commit atrocities against GOD'S creation, and too known for keeping the truth hid, and people lost; I'll keep following what was revealed to me via the Holy Spirit and verified through the simple unbiased reading of the written Word.

You wait and see. I wait with you.





Sent from my Z983 using Tapatalk
 

Nihilo

BANNED
Banned
Nihlo, Pops is right in this case. Even if someone is acting dumb, but especially if they are acting dumb, it doesn't help to call them dumb.

If scripture may be applicable, I reference Matthew 5:22, John 13:34, Galatians 5:14-15, and James 3:2. But as for that bit about needing to hear from a priest, I have my ordination from Jesus Christ, and here are my credentials:

Revelation 1:5-6 KJV
(5) And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,
(6) And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

By the same measure, if you are loved by Christ, and washed from your sins in his blood, then you are also ordained as a king and a priest, and as such it is a continual challenge that we must act as worthy kings and priests, let we be later judged as unfaithful or unworthy servants.
You missed where I said that's all I think about.

Do you have younger siblings, and how many do you have?
 

popsthebuilder

New member
I can wave around my Bible too. Why should I take your non-authoritative opinion on what the Bible means, or Gt's, as the truth? When it conflicts with what the Church's magisterium says about it? When I weigh the magisterium's authority and the authority of anonymous user accounts on TOL, what would compel me to side with the latter, in interpreting Sacred Scripture?

The Church teaches all about sin. She's got that subject nailed. I've no reason to listen to what anyone else is saying about sin. I can, and do, trust the authority of the Church herself, that Jesus built, which has been preserved in particular, with its lineage of popes from back to Peter, and their infallible doctrines in matters of faith and morals.







Sent from my
So you know the Bible and the teachings there of, but turn from them in favor of the ordinances of man?

Found the problem.

Sent from my Z983 using Tapatalk
 

Nihilo

BANNED
Banned
Uhm.... No.... Three days from the death of Jesus could just as easily and rightly be considered 3000 years. Not that such is my belief.
Well that's actually what I said....
Again, I do not deny the resurrection of the Christ and do attribute my own reception of faith to the risen Christ.
That sounds great.
If you deny the teachings of the Christ
I don't deny the teachings of the Christ, and I don't know why you're insisting on calling Him "the Christ" instead of just Christ.
then I have no reason to speak to you regardless of if you believe in a literal three day resurrection of a literal physical material Jesus or not.
:idunno:



Sent from using
 

popsthebuilder

New member
Well that's actually what I said....
That sounds great.
I don't deny the teachings of the Christ, and I don't know why you're insisting on calling Him "the Christ" instead of just Christ.
:idunno:



Sent from using

There is only One, hence "the".

Consider it a respect thing.

As far as denying the teachings is concerned; didn't you just say that the message He spoke while on earth isn't the message for you?

I've got news for you friend; it is the same message throughout the entire Bible and every other Holy writing written by men and inspired by GOD.



Sent from my Z983 using Tapatalk
 

Nihilo

BANNED
Banned
I tell you what; you follow the greedy inclinations of prideful men known to commit atrocities against GOD'S creation, and too known for keeping the truth hid, and people lost; I'll keep following what was revealed to me via the Holy Spirit and verified through the simple unbiased reading of the written Word.

You wait and see. I wait with you.
Could you be more inflammatory though? That'd be great.





Sent around
 

Nihilo

BANNED
Banned
There is only One, hence "the".
No one means anything other than the One when they don't use "the," is my point.
Consider it a respect thing.
It's disrespectful to the Church, who does not consider it disrespectful to refer to Him as Christ, without the "the." You're trying to show her up, you're trying to be holier than she is. Knock it off.
As far as denying the teachings is concerned; didn't you just say that the message He spoke while on earth isn't the message for you?

I've got news for you friend; it is the same message throughout the entire Bible and every other Holy writing written by men and inspired by GOD.
Thank you mister or madam cultist.



Sent away and did not return
 

marhig

Well-known member
Nihlo, Pops is right in this case. Even if someone is acting dumb, but especially if they are acting dumb, it doesn't help to call them dumb.

If scripture may be applicable, I reference Matthew 5:22, John 13:34, Galatians 5:14-15, and James 3:2. But as for that bit about needing to hear from a priest, I have my ordination from Jesus Christ, and here are my credentials:

Revelation 1:5-6 KJV
(5) And from Jesus Christ, who is the faithful witness, and the first begotten of the dead, and the prince of the kings of the earth. Unto him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood,
(6) And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen.

By the same measure, if you are loved by Christ, and washed from your sins in his blood, then you are also ordained as a king and a priest, and as such it is a continual challenge that we must act as worthy kings and priests, let we be later judged as unfaithful or unworthy servants.

I'm sorry I don't agree, many call themselves priests, many say that they are washed from their sins and don't live accordingly, look at what many priests etc. have been up to with children. They are not priests of God. A true man of God is made so by the power of the Holy Spirit, and you will know those who are washed in the blood of Christ by their lives, because they will be like him.

Many people profess to belong to God, but their lives and mouths show us otherwise. Those who are Christ's have Christ with them, and if Christ is with them, in and through them, then they are covered in his blood, and if their sins are truly washed away, then their lives will be changed and their old life gone and they will be walking in the Spirit in a new and living way by the will of God, not caring for the things of this world, and putting God first in their lives and truly following Jesus and bringing that love of God and life of Christ to others. Not only with lip service, but in their lives also, as they will be living it out, they are not proud, and haughty, but lowly and humble and they are servants not masters, it's the word that comes from that gives them the power, as it's from God. And their sins and flesh will be dying, put to death by the Spirit and they will be alive in God, born anew, into a new and living way, worshipping God in Spirit and in truth.

These are God's true church and Christ is their head and God is their heart and they love them with their all.
 

marhig

Well-known member
No one means anything other than the One when they don't use "the," is my point.
It's disrespectful to the Church, who does not consider it disrespectful to refer to Him as Christ, without the "the." You're trying to show her up, you're trying to be holier than she is. Knock it off.
Thank you mister or madam cultist.



Sent away and did not return
Well pops is right as that is the revelation that Peter had from the father.

Matthew 16

And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

And pops isn't a moron!
 

marhig

Well-known member
The finished work of Christ is the reconciliation of all men to God. His death, burial, and resurrection proved that he was the Son of God and the Savior of all men, especially those who believe. This means that he is the Savior of every lost person as well, it is just that the lost do not acknowledge him as such. It is much like the presidency of Donald Trump after the election. Donald Trump is the president of all Americans, especially those who voted for him. Yet, you still have those who will say, "he is not my president." Even so, the lost are many who are lost that say, "Jesus? He is not my Savior." Just because there are those who will deny that Jesus is the Savior of all men does not make him any less the Savior of all men.

Hiya and thanks for replying, although I'm in some agreement, I see it a bit differently, the finished work of Christ is the setting up of the gospel and bringing us a new and living way, ready to reconcile all those who believe in the ministry of reconciliation to God. He was about his father's business from the age of 12. And when he started preaching, he healed and saved, and he said that the father had given him work to finish

John 4:34 Jesus saith unto them, My meat is to do the will of him that sent me, and to finish his work. Say not ye, There are yet four months, and then cometh harvest? behold, I say unto you, Lift up your eyes, and look on the fields; for they are white already to harvest.

His work was to glorify God and to start the harvest and bring in as many as would believe through the gospel and make some apostles and some disciples as labourers to carry on the harvest.

John 5:36 But I have greater witness than that of John: for the works which the Father hath given me to finish, the same works that I do, bear witness of me, that the Father hath sent me.

John 17:4 I have glorified thee on the earth: I have finished the work which thou gavest me to do.

He had finished the work that the father gave him to do before he went on the cross, he had glorified him in the earth and brought to us a new and living way to follow.

And yes, the death burial and resurrection did prove that he was the son of God, because he fulfilled all the prophesies, and anyone who knew the scriptures could have seen by his life that he was the Messiah, even when he said my God why has thou forsaken me, he was referring to Psalm 22 which would clearly show that he is the Messiah!

But salvation is through faith by the grace of God.

The Road to loss is wide and paved with good works and vain obedience. The truth remains that obedience is not required to obtain salvation because He is the Savior of all men already. The truth remains that obedience is not required to retain salvation because the finished work of Jesus Christ is what sustains our salvation. The truth remains that all who are truly saved will obey and produce good works, but that salvation is not predicated upon said obedience.

This I don't agree with you here, once we are saved, we are to obey God. And if we don't obey God and live by his will then we can be cut off, this is shown in many verses in the New testament, we are to carry on in his goodness. If we turn away from God once we have known him, then we are putting our flesh before him and we are no longer being saved.

God won't leave his Spirit with those who choose the way of the devil. The flesh and world are of the devil, if we choose to live by the will of them then we can't expect God to stay with us. God won't be mocked!


I will never be careful about who I judge; but, I am extremely careful about how I judge.

Those born of God judge by the word of God and by nothing else.


To believe that we are to obey God isn't fruit either way. I do not have a problem with the truth of obeying God: however, I do have a problem with those who claim that obedience is the source of salvation. Jesus alone is the source of salvation, this is why he is the Savior to begin with. If our obedience secures our salvation then we are our own saviors, and to claim such is to claim equality with Jesus Christ.


We have to obey from the beginning, the first word Jesus spoke when be began to preach was repent, straight away he gives us an option, repent or not. We have choices from the start, believe or not, repent or not, follow or not and obey and do the will of God, or not.

This is why it is so important to speak out of truth in love, wisdom, and kindness. Frankly, I have not seen many here on TOL who do as such.

God is love, and those who truly follow him will have their hearts filled with his love, and God's goodness, mercy, forgiveness and love will be seen in and through them. This is the life of Christ in God's children, his true church.
 

popsthebuilder

New member
No one means anything other than the One when they don't use "the," is my point.
It's disrespectful to the Church, who does not consider it disrespectful to refer to Him as Christ, without the "the." You're trying to show her up, you're trying to be holier than she is. Knock it off.
Thank you mister or madam cultist.



Sent away and did not return
I don't know why you think I'm against the congregation of GOD or why you associate it with a division or sect as we are told that faith isn't to be divided in such a way.

Sent from my Z983 using Tapatalk
 

MichaelCadry

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Perhaps I am repeating something someone has already said in this thread so far, but I'll say it anyway. Jesus said in Matt. 28:19KJV, "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost;..."

There is only ONE God, ONE Jesus, and ONE Holy Ghost. I believe in the Trinity!! I don't really care if you don't agree with my deduction or not. I'm not trying to be mean or uppity. It is just how I believe. Believe what you want to. I just have that in my relationship with God, Jesus, and someone whom has been visited by the Holy Ghost three times, most recently a few days ago!! I can tell the real Holy Spirit from Satan's version of it also, so don't think I was deceived whatsoever. I could tell you other secrets, but I refrain from saying them to ears that won't hear.

Much Love In God, Christ, and the Holy Spirit!!

Michael
 

popsthebuilder

New member
Perhaps I am repeating something someone has already said in this thread so far, but I'll say it anyway. Jesus said in Matt. 28:19KJV, "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost;..."

There is only ONE God, ONE Jesus, and ONE Holy Ghost. I believe in the Trinity!! I don't really care if you don't agree with my deduction or not. I'm not trying to be mean or uppity. It is just how I believe. Believe what you want to. I just have that in my relationship with God, Jesus, and someone whom has been visited by the Holy Ghost three times, most recently a few days ago!! I can tell the real Holy Spirit from Satan's version of it also, so don't think I was deceived whatsoever. I could tell you other secrets, but I refrain from saying them to ears that won't hear.

Much Love In God, Christ, and the Holy Spirit!!

Michael
I tried to pm but have reached some memory quota. Deleting messages has yet to fix the issue.

So I am posting this here.

Sorry, thanks, peace

Mr. Mike,

please do not consider me against any perception man might receive of our Loving GOD.

I have two contrasting points.

Perhaps you could give your thoughts, by GOD, and not of our own vain imaginings.

I cannot justifiably believe that any man whatsoever should ever be literally equated to the literal fullness of GOD.
This is verified by much scripture.

The other point;

I cannot limit the capacities of GOD; If it was the will of GOD to manifest utterly and wholly into a human vessel, then who am I do deny such?

Equating man to GOD will and does lead to atrocity through entitlement.

Though I place the man Jesus under the subjection of the eternal GOD as he walked the earth in physical manifestation, I do consider the Christ of GOD to be synonymous with the Eternal GOD now as GOD is Spirit and the Spirit of Jesus did surely return to the right hand of GOD.

My fight is not against Jesus/ the Christ, but against the blinding of the potential of man who does follow and wish for the Will of GOD alone in their life, by the vanity and pride of mislead men.

I see no reason to divide any among Trinity/unity lines unless it is leading to entitlement, inequity, and pride/discrimination.

I wish you the very best Sir. I had wondered about you recently.

I am glad to see you are very well, and gladder still for the visit you did witness.

peace brother

Sent from my Z983 using Tapatalk
 

lifeisgood

New member

Never seen that verse in the Bible in relation to Peter being an infallible Pope. Please direct me to the 'sure' verse.

Do you believe Paul's epistles are scriptures?

Yes.

That's because Peter said they're scriptures.

Nah. Don't think so.

They are scriptures because the information comes directly from the risen Lord Christ Jesus giving such information to Paul and Peter reading the Lord's instructions as given to Paul, and Peter saying (kudos to Peter): "He [Paul] writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction" (2 Peter 3:16). Kudos to Peter again for recognizing the Lord's hand in Paul's writings.

Nothing about Peter saying 'I, Peter, say that they are scriptures'; in that way, taking the place of the risen Lord. Peter would never do that after He returned to the flock as the Lord said he would.
 

lifeisgood

New member
No, you moron. The Bible testifies of the singular authority of the Church, calling her the ground and pillar of the truth. Again, could you be more inflammatory? Try respect.
We sure did.

At that time the RCC did not even exist yet.

Could you provide from the New Testament
  • the papacy;
  • worship/adoration of Mary;
  • the immaculate conception of Mary;
  • the perpetual virginity of Mary;
  • the assumption of Mary;
  • Mary as co-redemptrix and mediatrix;
  • petitioning saints in heaven for their prayers,
  • apostolic succession,
  • the ordinances of the RCC functioning as sacraments,
  • infant baptism,
  • confession of sin to a priest,
  • purgatory,
  • indulgences,
  • the equal authority of church tradition and Scripture;
  • praying to dead people
 
Top