ECT The Rebellion that Desolates
- Thread starter Interplanner
- Start date
- Status
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Will Interplanner identify the prince of the covenant?
Interplanner
Well-known member
Don't need to. Will you stop your obsession with the/our future and one particular passage, never interped by the NT while hundreds are?
Just curious, have you figured out who south is and why it would matter at that time who south is, because I see nothing about ch 11 that flits off to a distant future. It's just in those times v21 when Persia and Greece were in conflict, in a chapter transition that even the NIV puts in ( )s.
No thanks, ch 9 is perfectly clear and he settled all the details in Mt24A etc.
Just curious, have you figured out who south is and why it would matter at that time who south is, because I see nothing about ch 11 that flits off to a distant future. It's just in those times v21 when Persia and Greece were in conflict, in a chapter transition that even the NIV puts in ( )s.
No thanks, ch 9 is perfectly clear and he settled all the details in Mt24A etc.
3P meets Matt. 24A/Matt. 24B :chuckle:
Interplanner
Well-known member
If the passage is about Greece vs Persia, who is "South" and "North"?
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
If it's history, we should know his identity.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Yes, it is perfectly clear. The 70th week does not begin until AFTER the city and sanctuary are destroyed.
There is no other reasonable "interp".
Here ya go - but be warned; the following is one heck of a fascinating, but long...post.
What Do Preterists Believe About "The Prince" in the 70 Weeks of Daniel?
https://www.preteristarchive.com/Modern/2001_blume_daniel-9.html
Rom. 5:8.
Interplanner
Well-known member
You are out on your own limb. I have never read that anywhere from any Hebrew trained commentary. You are a dishonest fool about any thing that cause 2P2P to crack, because it is a fraud.
It is handled by Christ in Mt24A and Mt24A is about 1st century Judea. Done.
Interplanner
Well-known member
I'm not a preterist, but I might be interested in reading it. After posting things on it for 2 years here, there is no need to read some long post I have never heard to find out what I think.
It is a fascinating read. I'll give it that.
And no, you are not a Preterist.
Nor even a Partial.
Nevertheless, many of your views do appear "partial" to theirs :chuckle:
Nevertheless, Romans 14:5 towards you, in memory of Romans 5:8.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
It's in Daniel 9.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Nope.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Who was the prince of the covenant? Who fits all of the descriptions from Daniel 8-11?
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
I would say that IP is a partial preterist.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
:idunno:
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
:idunno:
Right Divider
Body part
Why won't the great historian answer this question?
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
He believes the actual identity of the brash anti messiah is irrelevant?
- Status