They are liars. The evidence is undeniable. Literally UNDENIABLE. So much so that, at this point, you are either lying yourself or you are stupid.
Just describe the evidence, dude. What is the evidence that the hosts at MSNBC are disingenuous? What is the evidence that Chris Hayes and Rachel Maddow are sociopaths and Hannity and Carlson are empaths?
And after I gave you a half compliment? Now I take it back. You are suffering from the same ailment as marke and dozer.
I've seen the entire unedited video. They emptied the room and when they thought the coast was clear they pulled out boxes full of ballots and then ran them through the machines multiple times.
Sounds like you are describing the edited version of the video. Otherwise we are seeing different things in the same video. I would look into this with you if I thought you would have integrity enough to admit when you were wrong. But, I fear you are no better than marke at this point.
You are so outstandingly, naively stupid.
Laughably idiotic stupidity.
Ad hominems seem your only recourse.
There are more dead people that vote than that in every major city in the country!
There are instances of easily explainable misunderstandings about two people with the same name.
Whether such a person casting such a vote has committed a crime would be hard to prove either way but that isn't the point. Whether the person could be charged with a crime isn't the criteria for determining whether a particular ballot is legitimate and should be counted. Such a vote would absolutely NOT be a valid ballot and should not be counted precisely because there is a credible question as to its veracity. That's the way you must do it or else you build opportunities for cheating into the system.
Again I am describing a Junior voting when the Senior is dead. Of course voting under this circumstance is legal. Your confusion does not stop someone else from voting. You need to clear your head.
You're just trying to convince yourself here. It's plain enough to me that it you who are being emotional. If brains were dynamite, there'd not be enough between your ears to blow the fuzz off a peach. You couldn't think your way out of a wet paper bag, never mind dispassionately look at whether your most hated politician actually lost an election.
Your perceptions were suspect. Now this -- it is clear that they are way off. You think you know my emotions and my IQ. I am calm and reasonably smart. My highest IQ measured by a professional is 130. You seem to be projecting. Your emotions are flared up as evidenced by your frequent use of wild ad hominem.
No amount of evidence would persuade you! Hunter's laptop is mountains more evidence by itself! If 1% of that kind of evidence existed against Trump it would many times more than you'd need to throw Trump in the deepest pit your could find! But Biden could come out and admit it and you wouldn't care. Harris could walk up and give Xi Jinping a big wet kiss on the mouth and you'd think it was the political break through of the century!
Hunter used his relationship to a national politician to angle some questionable roles in foreign contries. Immoral but not illegal. This is a minor blemish on Biden along side Trump who he himself violated the emolument clause, illegally dodges taxes left and right, and colludes with foreign governments to influence national elections. Not to mention sexual crimes and inciting violent insurrection. The list goes on.
You're projecting. You are defending what anyone in the 1980s would have instantly recognized as Marxist Communism! And make no mistake about it, that is precisely what the left wants, a communist America. They WILL NOT be satisfied with anything like a Canadian or Denmark style Socialism. Just like they weren't satisfied with the New Deal, just like they were satisfied when the destroyed nearly the entire black race in America with their socialist programs, just like they aren't satisfied now with having taken over the healthcare sector of our economy. They are NEVER satisfied - EVER! The country will be destitute and burning in anarchy and chaos and they will still not be convinced that the government isn't the solution to the problem, it is the problem. If every man woman and child on the entire Earth starved to death, the last liberal standing would try to unionize (i.e. collectivize / communize) the animals before he took his last communist breath.
Clete
I believe our capitalistic system should be tempered by socialistic policies. That does not make me a communist. The same is true of the vast majority of liberals. You have trouble discerning nuance, and are unfortunately a dichotomous thinker just like marke. Do better.
