• This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.

The "miracle" of evolution is a myth - part 1

Alate_One

Well-known member
Are you a rock?

Explain why you get a headache if I hit you on the head with a rock if you aren't a rock?
Maybe you've been hit in the head by too many rocks? Viruses can attack an organism because their proteins fit into a "slot" on the surface of the cell. If humans had nothing physically to do with animals, why should they have such similar "slots" to those found in animals (specifically mammals in this case)?
 

marke

Well-known member
Maybe you've been hit in the head by too many rocks? Viruses can attack an organism because their proteins fit into a "slot" on the surface of the cell. If humans had nothing physically to do with animals, why should they have such similar "slots" to those found in animals (specifically mammals in this case)?
Why assume similarities in physical characteristics or similarities in DNA mean Darwinism disproves God?
 

ok doser

Well-known member
Maybe you've been hit in the head by too many rocks? Viruses can attack an organism because their proteins fit into a "slot" on the surface of the cell. If humans had nothing physically to do with animals, why should they have such similar "slots" to those found in animals (specifically mammals in this case)?
Who is saying that humans have nothing physically to do with animals? We were all created by God. It's obvious to me that the similarities of mechanisms on a cellular level are due to that intelligent design.
 

marke

Well-known member
Who is saying that humans have nothing physically to do with animals? We were all created by God. It's obvious to me that the similarities of mechanisms on a cellular level are due to that intelligent design.
Human biology is far too complicated to have been created by dumb luck or whatever stupid method unsaved sinners think may have done it. Natural selection is not God and has less evidence of being real than God has.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Natural selection is unscientific. It has not been observed, measured, or proven to be fact.

Don't overstate your position.

Natural selection DOES occur.

What DOES NOT occur, however, is the gain of function through natural selection, as natural selection" can only REMOVE the unfit, not make a species more fit.
 

marke

Well-known member
Don't overstate your position.

Natural selection DOES occur.

What DOES NOT occur, however, is the gain of function through natural selection, as natural selection" can only REMOVE the unfit, not make a species more fit.
Yes, evolution occurs, but not Darwinian macroevolution. Real evolution and real natural selection are terms that only describe what is better described as God-given natural abilities to adapt to changing environments and circumstances.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Yes, evolution occurs, but not Darwinian macroevolution. Real evolution and real natural selection are terms that only describe what is better described as God-given natural abilities to adapt to changing environments and circumstances.
That was exactly JR's point. This means that your earlier statement was incorrect.
Natural selection is unscientific. It has not been observed, measured, or proven to be fact.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Are you saying my clarifications are right but do not agree with your misinterpretations of my original statements?
I'm saying :
  • You make a false statement.
  • Someone points it out.
  • You do not repent of your false statement.
  • You try to divert instead of taking responsibility for your original false statement.
 

marke

Well-known member
I'm saying :
  • You make a false statement.
  • Someone points it out.
  • You do not repent of your false statement.
  • You try to divert instead of taking responsibility for your original false statement.
You are being uncharitable. I will go back and explain myself for you.
 

marke

Well-known member
Natural selection is unscientific. It has not been observed, measured, or proven to be fact.
Natural selection as portrayed by evolutionists to explain the evolution of different species is unscientific. Evolutionary natural selection of Darwinian evolution of the species has not been observed, measured, or proven to be fact. Secularists take natural God-given abilities and add fictional powers to support Darwinian evolution which is a lie and is not scientific.

Here is an evolutionary view that does not demonstrate or prove natural selection drives Darwinian evolution:


Natural selection is one of the central mechanisms of evolutionary change and is the process responsible for the evolution of adaptive features. Without a working knowledge of natural selection, it is impossible to understand how or why living things have come to exhibit their diversity and complexity. An understanding of natural selection also is becoming increasingly relevant in practical contexts, including medicine, agriculture, and resource management. Unfortunately, studies indicate that natural selection is generally very poorly understood, even among many individuals with postsecondary biological education
 
Top