The Joys of Catholicism

Right Divider

Body part
Don't forget you're on record.


Taste your own medicine and MAKE A CASE instead of just giving us "your useless opinions" RD.

"METAPHOR" poser.
I guess that making a fool of yourself is your main goal in life.

A "cloud of witnesses" can only be a metaphor. There is NO literal way to take that.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Maybe you should be a professional gambler if you're so sure of your guesses.
Your retarded posts are all the proof that I need.
Oh yeah wow good point.

I mean ... except for the way which the Church has always taken it.
Fallacious arguments are your only "comeback"?
Appeal to authority (especially a fake one) is a FALLACY!

I don't care that your phony "Church" cannot understand obvious figures of speech (or that the book to the HEBREWS is to the .... HEBREWS).
 

Idolater

"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
Your retarded posts are all the proof that I need.
Your retarded posts.

Fallacious arguments are your only "comeback"?
Appeal to authority (especially a fake one) is a FALLACY!
Prove it without begging the question, which means, without appealing to authority. Namely, an authority on what constitutes a logical fallacy.

You won't, because you can't.

I don't care that your phony "Church"
There was literally One Church for 1000 years RD. Unless you want to say that Arians and other heretics count as the Church.

cannot understand obvious figures of speech
MAKE A CASE. Poser.

(or that the book to the HEBREWS is to the .... HEBREWS).
Irrelevant. The departed Saints either surround us or they don't, it doesn't matter whom Hebrews was written to.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Your retarded posts.
Your 6th grade comeback?
Prove it without begging the question, which means, without appealing to authority. Namely, an authority on what constitutes a logical fallacy.
That is retarded, but par for the course with Idolator.
You won't, because you can't.
Try to make an actual argument instead of repeating your fallacies.
There was literally One Church for 1000 years RD. Unless you want to say that Arians and other heretics count as the Church.
Fake news. Paul never submitted to Peter, so that alone disproves the authority of your "Church".
Irrelevant. The departed Saints either surround us or they don't, it doesn't matter whom Hebrews was written to.
"Cloud of witnesses" is a figure of speech called a METAPHOR, despite your silly protestations.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Oh yeah wow good point.

I mean ... except for the way which the Church has always taken it.

Appeal to tradition is a logical fallacy.

Don't base your beliefs on logical fallacies.

Fallacious arguments are your only "comeback"?
Appeal to authority (especially a fake one) is a FALLACY!

As stated above, in this case, it's not an appeal to authority, it's an appeal to tradition.

Appeal to authority is "X is an authority, X said P, therefore P must be correct."

Appeal to tradition is "P has always been done, therefore P is correct."

Your retarded posts.

Quit provoking other members.

Prove it without begging the question, which means, without appealing to authority. Namely, an authority on what constitutes a logical fallacy.

How about the rules of grammar.

"Cloud of witnesses" cannot be anything other than a figure of speech.

You won't, because you can't.

Hypocrite.

There was literally One Church for 1000 years RD.

So what?

Doesn't make them correct.

MAKE A CASE. Poser.

Hypocrite.
 

Idolater

"Foundation of the World" Dispensationalist χρ
Certainly, since appeal to tradition is a subtype of appeal to authority.
The argument supports a position by appealing to long-standing or traditional opinion, as if the past itself were a kind of authority.
The argument supports a position by appealing to long-standing or traditional opinion, as if the Apostles themselves are a kind of authority.

Fixed it.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
The argument supports a position by appealing to long-standing or traditional opinion,

Which is fallacious. Traditions can be wrong.

as if the Apostles themselves are a kind of authority.

The Apostles WERE authorities. And they WILL BE authorities... in the coming Kingdom of Israel. Currently, their ministry is NOT authoritative,

Fixed it.

I advise against putting words in other people's mouths that they clearly did not mean or say.
 
Top