The Death Penalty should be applied equally to all ages

JudgeRightly

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Avajs said:
Yeah, but unfortunately for you, you live in the USA not Russia or Saudi Arabia or some other totalitarian state.
My comment was just to emphasize trial by a jury of one's peers goes back a long way in English common law.
Yes, you can always waive that right, but, at least at the moment it cannot be taken away from you.
To suggest that a nine year old should be subject to the death penalty is simply --- sorry, I have trouble coming up with the correct word--ridiculous does not seem strong enough.
Click to expand...

Do you believe in equity?
 
Arthur Brain

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
JudgeRightly said:
You waffling doesn't count.



It's called sanity, Arthur. Something you wouldn't know about, because of how insane you are.

Who WOULDN'T recognize that a NINE YEAR OLD RAPING A FIVE YEAR OLD is an abomination, and that the only rational solution is to eliminate the abomination from society, so that he cannot reoffend.



Dogwhistle moment.

Advocating for the death penalty for someone who raped a five year old is not "extremist."

It's NORMAL.



Irrelevant.



Waffle.



This you?

Spoiler










Oh, and before I forget to address this, since I forgot last time:



No, that's not what I said.

My solution is to put people to death who commit crimes that are worthy of the death penalty, REGARDLESS of mental health, because IF a mentally ill person is incapable of understanding why killing someone is not to be done, they are a danger to society, and, having already committed the act, they are no longer "just a risk." They have actually harmed society, and should be removed from it, because they have demonstrated that they are unable to control their impulses like a normal member of society does.



False.



You mean like the five year old who was raped by a nine year old?

So protected!



No.

I advocate putting young children who have committed capital crimes to death.

There's a difference.

If you're not intellectually honest enough to recognize that distinction, then it's clear you'll never understand the "why" that I alluded on Page 1 of this thread.



For the reasons explained previously.



You're certainly welcome to your opinions, but that's all they are.

God will triumph in the end.



Wow, you completely messed that one up.

There's not even any point in attempting a response, because it so missed the point, it's not even in the same country, let alone the same ballfield...



Jesus is the reason for the season, Arthur.

Merry Christmas.



Who said he was?





Or to enact a punishment, for that matter.



Thanks for putting into words how I feel every time I talk to you. I appreciate it. Truly!
Click to expand...

You have advocated on this forum, that it's fine for five year old kids to be executed JR, to the 'point' where they could be stabbed to death as an "appropriate" form of execution. To anyone with a functioning moral compass, even of sorts, that is beyond sickening. You never could provide Biblical support, specifically to uphold that position. Care to give it another try and not a vague verse where it would need to be contorted to have it apply to toddlers and infants?
 
JudgeRightly

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Arthur Brain said:
Do you think holding five year old children as accountable for their actions as a fully grown adult to be 'Godly'? To convict them and execute them for 'capital crimes'? Even America, as insane a it is with the present leadership right now, wouldn't dream of going that far.
Click to expand...

If we allow one person to get away with a crime, what does it teach other criminals?
 
VladtheDestroyer

VladtheDestroyer

Member
Arthur Brain said:
A five year old is a child, not a criminal.
Click to expand...
This is Israel. Israel liked to steal when we were little kids. Do you know why he liked to steal? Because nothing would ever happen to him when he got caught. He would steal everything because he knew he would never really be punished for it. He would break into peoples garages and steal stuff before he even knew how to ride a bicycle and he would always get away with it because he was so young and his parents didnt seem to care. I remember once we were hanging out at the nearby mall together when we like 11 and he got caught stealing a couple cassette tapes and all security did was make us call his mom's "boyfriend" and have him pick us up because "he was too young to get into trouble".

Just a couple years after that, Israel took a man out into the street, made him get down on his knees and murdered him in cold blood. Blew his brains out while the guy begging for his life and people were screaming "No! Don't do it Israel!" That is no lie. He must have only been about 13 or 14 at the time. And he was still to young to get into trouble. Not much trouble anyways. Went to juvenile detention and got out when he about 18. He knew he would get caught. And He knew he wasn't going to get the death penalty! He certainly wasn't the only juvenile we knew from the neighborhood who murdered somebody that was back out on the street again! They just figure "why not?"
 
JudgeRightly

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Arthur Brain said:
A five year old is a child, not a criminal.
Click to expand...

You're avoiding the question because you know where it leads. Stop being irrational. You're fake kindness is harmful to society.

A five year old is a human being made in God's image. A person.

Murder is a crime.

If a five year old commits murder, he has committed a crime. His age is irrelevant to that fact.

So, again I ask you, if we allow one person, even if they're five years old, to get away with a crime, what does it teach him and other (would-be) criminals?
 
Nick M

Nick M

Fully Semi-Automatic
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
I guessed Wikipedia has a list of children that commit murder. They do. They all start at 6 years old. One lovely lad who was 9, murdered 4 people. 6 year old children committing murder. Wiki being the perverts they are don't use the term murder. They say intentionally killed. Which is incorrect. Florida intentionally killed Ted Bundy, and it was not murder. But that can be a different thread.
 
Nick M

Nick M

Fully Semi-Automatic
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
In 1905, Godino attacked 18-month-old Ana Neri, taking the girl to a secluded area, where he hit her in the head with a rock several times. As in the first case, a police officer witnessed the assault and rushed to help the girl, subsequently taking Godino to the police station. However, due to his age, he was released that same night.

On 29 March 1906, 9-year-old Godino committed his first murder. He lured María Rosa Face, a three-year-old girl, to a vacant lot where he brutally attacked her, strangling her with a ligature. Godino hastily buried Face alive and threw empty cans on her before escaping. Face's body was never found; when Godino was arrested, he confessed to the murder and took police to the vacant lot, where an apartment building had been built by 1912.

Two weeks after killing Face, Godino's father caught him strangling chickens from his farm. The man severely beat Godino before taking him to the police station, where officers accepted to arrest the boy. In a statement before the police chief, Godino's father also testified that he had found a box with dead birds under his son's bed. A judge ordered that Godino be taken to a reformatory, where he spent two months in detention. Upon release, he resumed street roaming and petty criminality

Six days after attempting to kill González, Godino viciously attacked 22-month-old Julio Botte, burning the boy's eyelids with a cigarette
Click to expand...
The brainless moron agrees with the actions taken by the government. Don't execute him, and release him so he can torture and murder more innocent people.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top