I'm not interested in being an ally with a libertarian like you, especially a very confused libertarian like you.
What a bizarre thing to say.
By you and your fellow libertarians?
Of course not. What a bizarre thing to ask.
Cite?
Is that what libertarians like you think?
Cite what, that the Grand Jury hearing the case didn't bring charges against the officer and therefore wasn't concerned that one of the four shots fired by the Officer hit your gang banging Saint in the back?
That the grand jury wasn't concerned that Keith was shot in the back
Keith was shot in the back, yes.
So far, your attempts to describe how you think I think have been an absolute disaster for you, and indicative of a mental disorder.
Yes it does.
Surprise surprise, another instance of you, in your confused (drug-addled?) libertarian mind bestowing sainthood on a criminal.
Pierson said the gunshot wound to the back, near Keith's armpit, corroborates Griffith's statement and other evidence.
Right, and contradicts you
YOU, my silly little confused libertarian friend, are the only one who's been calling him a Saint.
Once again you are confused. I never said that. You're lying. You should stop lying.
Are you planning to confer sainthood on this friend of yours too?
From the link:
| Anthony Pierson, from the Ohio Attorney General’s Office’s Special Prosecutions Section, said Wednesday that CMHA police officer James Griffiths and other officers were responding to a call about a person with a gun at the public housing complex near East 55th Street and Woodland Avenue. An officer, whom Pierson did not identify, opened the door of a black minivan where he saw someone moving. The officer told investigators he could see Keith had a gun. “The officer gives commands for Arthur to drop the gun and get out of the vehicle,” Pierson said. “Mr. Keith gets out of the vehicle, turns toward the officer, and according to the officer, points the gun at him,” Pierson said. Griffiths then fired four times, striking Keith once in the back. Pierson said the gunshot wound to the back, near Keith's armpit, corroborates Griffith's statement and other evidence. “Someone with a gun in their left hand, turn back and be shot and produce that wound, that wound is consistent with that trajectory as well as if someone had a gun in their right hand and was pointing it back, that wound would also be consistent,” he said. Pierson said Keith was 15 to 20 feet away from Griffiths when he pointed the gun at the officer and about the same distance away when he was shot. A firearm was found near Keith after he continued running away a short distance before falling. “The gun was retrieved and analyzed. Mr. Keith's DNA was on that weapon. It was on the trigger, the slide and the magazine,” Pierson said. |
TOL's head libertarian is occasionally good for something (it's a good thing that Saint Ronald wasn't shot in the back, or we'd have repeat of the St. Arthur Keith discussion).
www.kxan.com
Yes, you are
You'll notice that if not all, the vast majority of these Saint's were on drugs. Surely you're not denouncing recreational drug use are you? Ron Paul would disown you if that were the case.Yes, you are
You're good for mocking for all of your ridiculous conferring of sainthood on thugs
People should note that libertarians never, and I mean NEVER denounce recreational drug use, as it's a huge part of their ideology and political movement.There you go again!
And here you are conferring sainthood on these drug addicted thugs, you libertarian
Is that a long awaited denunciation of recreational drug use? BTW, one of your fellow libertarians made reference to one of the druggies killed by the police as being the Messiah. I guess I'm disrespecting them by only giving them Sainthood huh?And here you are conferring sainthood on these drug addicted thugs, you libertarian
Is it?
Again your drug-addled mind has you confused.
Checking my calendar to see if Hell froze over in the past hour, no, it wasn't a denunciation of recreational drug use on your part, as recreational drug use is a huge part of libertarian ideology and the political movement.
Oh, is that what you were expecting you silly drug-addled confused libertarian you?
That would explain your willingness to confer sainthood on thugs who recreationally use drugs and assault police officers.