anytime you think you can offer a better answer, feel free to give it a try
Spammers wasteland
- Thread starter Delmar
- Start date
- Status
anytime you think you can offer a better answer, feel free to give it a try
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well, pretty much any answer would be better than that. The mob were convicted by their own conscience to leave until there was no one left besides Jesus and the woman, this verse wouldn't have done that. It's all conjecture but a more logical answer would be Jesus writing stuff on the ground that everyone would have been guilty of, lying, hypocrisy etc.
Your conjecture is just flat out absurd.
why?
why wouldn't Jesus reminding them of the Law be the best answer, considering that they were trying to trap him with a perverted form of the Law?
of course it would, it would have reminded them that they were perverting the very Law they were trying to trap Him with
and they were all about the Law
or, with just a single reference to scripture, perversion of the Law
it really isn't artie, if you consider the crowd, what they were trying to do to Jesus, and what they were immersed in, culturally, since birth
they were slaves to the Law, and in one quick scribble in the dirt, Jesus showed them that they were perverting that very Law
Here Anna, here is a parting gift for people who lost the election:
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
That's gotta be from Overstock.com. :chuckle:
Its from WeWonAndYouLostSoStopCrying.com
Given the fact that half the electorate are imbeciles and baby-killers, I don't care.
Oh, and welcome to my ignore list. You're another person I don't give a crap about.
Then you don't care about the foundation of meaningful representation. But that's your right.
It might be easier if you just put the other list up. Who's on it other than you?
It should come from anyone who thinks the people should elect a president and no geography. In the present case I didn't root for either of the candidates. But I do like the principle of one man, one vote.
I'd like to think that if a golfer can correct an errant score and see the point in something other than the win, anything is competitively possible. But you have to have the right man.
Aren't you concerned with how and who's going to clean up after this magic-wand party?
A dollar to a donut...its gonna be funded by the likes of you, me, doser...et al.
That question is nonsensical and plain dumb. Please stop trolling the thread with nonsense unless you have something intelligent to say, which I have yet to see.
Is this your normal demeanor?
It seems quite cowardly to talk at a person who has you on ignore so he cannot respond. Is that how you earned your post as moderator at the other forum? By being unethical? No doubt.
Who asked you. Your demeanor is being on permanent "Jerk" status. He's challenging a troll, like you.
Excuse me sir. Are you mad because I left your hate forum that you run, and now you had to follow me over here and start harassing me? Are you some sort of sick stalker? You're reported.
I think it's goofy to say something to someone and THEN stick your fingers in your ears. My post was responsive.
Sure he can. He's chosen not to. He's not entitled to the last word coupled with an insult unless I feel like giving it to him.
By being fair? Maybe. How did you earn...well, no, I guess you didn't.
You need a better dictionary. And a fairer mind.
Seems straight forward and sensical to me. :idunno: You just don't like its implications or are you just not a forward thinking individual?
Someone is blabbing again. LOL. Can't see it.
That's what bad about the ignore function. People you ignore can still see you and post garbage against you but you cannot rebut. I just have to trust that other people see his twisted crap for what it is.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
It's funny when someone doesn't understand how the ignore function works.
Just because they put someone on ignore doesn't mean the ignored person has to ignore them back. :chuckle:
- Status