(Stipe shows us an underexposed picture of the moon, and an overexposed picture of Pluto)Nice try, Stipe.
It turns out to have an unexepected liquid ocean below the ice on the surface... Maybe you can figure out something to do with that. Worth a try. But you might want to do a reality check on the story, next time.
What's funny is how little you appreciate the additional problems you raise for your notion that Pluto is millions of years old.
Here's an idea: Accurately recount OP and concede the fact that evolutionists expected a particular type of Pluto, but found the opposite.
Then perhaps a sensible discussion can emerge.
And Elohim said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: And let them be for lights in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth: and it was so. And Elohim made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And Elohim set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and Elohim saw that it was good. These facts can only be embraced by trust: By trust we understand that the universe was formed at Elohim's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible.
However, the problem is that OP makes a very specific set of observations. It is those that are being ignored. Talking about other stuff just helps the Darwinists keep avoiding the challenge.