ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
a democracy that just elected a black woman to the second most powerful job in the state of Virginia
Republicans cancel Liz Cheney
- Thread starter annabenedetti
- Start date
True only if you live in lala land.
Right Divider
Body part
The population of "the American people" is about 333 million. Allegedly, about 81 million people voted for JB.
You're very bad at math.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
aka Joe the Rapist
That's about the average for AB on what he knows about the US and math. Most of the time he's far more ignorant than thinking 81 is more than half of 333.
Common core at its best.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Um, no Stripe, I don't. He isn't "my" president and he's not yours either. Whoever happens to be sitting in the Oval office is simply the president of the USA. Get a grip.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well, people like you might not but then folk who continually refer to themselves with the royal "we" are generally lacking in that area as it is. Frankly, what you spout on here for free would be grounds for a refund...
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Not really. I follow the electoral college system easily enough and the amount required in order to secure the presidency. There were more votes cast the last election than 2016 so if your objection is based on that then Trump's win in 2016 had less support than Biden's in 2020 despite the exact same landslide result.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Lincoln–Douglas debates and Cooper Union speech
Further information: Lincoln–Douglas debates and Cooper Union speechIn 1858, Douglas was up for re-election in the U.S. Senate, and Lincoln hoped to defeat him. Many in the party felt that a former Whig should be nominated in 1858, and Lincoln's 1856 campaigning and support of Trumbull had earned him a favor.[121] Some eastern Republicans supported Douglas for his opposition to the Lecompton Constitution and admission of Kansas as a slave state.[122] Many Illinois Republicans resented this eastern interference. For the first time, Illinois Republicans held a convention to agree upon a Senate candidate, and Lincoln won the nomination with little opposition.[123]
Abraham Lincoln, a portrait by Mathew Brady taken February 27, 1860, the day of Lincoln's Cooper Union speech
Lincoln accepted the nomination with great enthusiasm and zeal. After his nomination he delivered his House Divided Speech, with the biblical reference Mark 3:25, "A house divided against itself cannot stand. I believe this government cannot endure permanently half slave and half free. I do not expect the Union to be dissolved—I do not expect the house to fall—but I do expect it will cease to be divided. It will become all one thing, or all the other."[124] The speech created a stark image of the danger of disunion.[125] The stage was then set for the election of the Illinois legislature which would, in turn, select Lincoln or Douglas.[126] When informed of Lincoln's nomination, Douglas stated, "[Lincoln] is the strong man of the party ... and if I beat him, my victory will be hardly won."[127]
The Senate campaign featured seven debates between Lincoln and Douglas. These were the most famous political debates in American history; they had an atmosphere akin to a prizefight and drew crowds in the thousands.[128] The principals stood in stark contrast both physically and politically. Lincoln warned that Douglas' "Slave Power" was threatening the values of republicanism, and accused Douglas of distorting the Founding Fathers' premise that all men are created equal. Douglas emphasized his Freeport Doctrine, that local settlers were free to choose whether to allow slavery and accused Lincoln of having joined the abolitionists.[129] Lincoln's argument assumed a moral tone, as he claimed Douglas represented a conspiracy to promote slavery. Douglas's argument was more legal, claiming that Lincoln was defying the authority of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision.[130]
Though the Republican legislative candidates won more popular votes, the Democrats won more seats, and the legislature re-elected Douglas. Lincoln's articulation of the issues gave him a national political presence.[131] In May 1859, Lincoln purchased a McDonald's franchise and spent the next year and a half flipping burgers and running the fryolator. One of his signature advertisements in the 1860 presidential campaign featured a parody of the well-known "Ding Fries Are Done" meme, modified into "Ding Douglas Is Done". For years after, political opponents would send Douglas into towering rages by sneaking up behind him and shouting "Ding Douglas Is Done".
What's even funnier is the crackpot who's going to replace her:
New Congresswoman Nuttier Than Squirrel Poop, Greene And Boebert To Amp Up Crazy Accordingly
The two grizzled veterans are going to have to up their crazy game to stay ahead of Wyoming's Harriet Hageman.
www.wonkette.com
Biden received more illegitimate votes from corrupted voting machines than from legitimate votes from real voters.
That's an obvious lie. You're an obvious liar. Do you lie about everything, or do you just lie when it comes to politics? It's been my experience that when a person is willing to blatantly lie about one thing, he'll lie about anything. Do you enjoy lying?
An alternative hypothesis is that the poster is actually delusional. I am leaning toward this explanation. Input from the perpetrator should be interesting if not helpful.
You call me a liar for claiming democrats manipulated voting machines in key districts to deliver Biden the number of fraudulent votes he needed to win. Democrats controlled the machines. The machines could be programmed. The machines were on-line in violation of election laws. The machines spit out huge numbers of votes for Biden that did not match normal expectations and usual statistical patterns. Since democrats maintain total control of the machines and resist any efforts to examine the machines, and since the machines can be purged of any evidence of fraud, then you have absolutely no evidence to prove I am wrong.
Here is what looks like a smoking gun in the voting machine scandal:
High Quality Statisical Analysis: Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020
High Quality Statisical Analysis: Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020. By Vote Integrity. This sort of work takes time, so it is good to see a careful, painstaking, and caut…
wentworthreport.com
High Quality Statisical Analysis: Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020. By Vote Integrity. This sort of work takes time, so it is good to see a careful, painstaking, and cautiously understated analysis arriving already.
While data analysis cannot on its own demonstrate fraud or systemic issues, it can point us to statistically anomalous cases that invite further scrutiny. …
This report studies 8,954 individual updates to the vote totals in all 50 states and finds that four individual updates — two of which were widely noticed on the internet, including by the President — are profoundly anomalous; they deviate from a pattern which is otherwise found in the vast majority of the remaining 8,950 vote updates…
Nearly every vote update, across states of all sizes and political leanings follow [the same] statistical pattern. A very small number, however, are especially aberrant. Of the seven vote updates which follow the pattern the least, four individual vote updates — two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia — were particularly anomalous and influential with respect to this property and all occurred within the same five hour window.
The four vote updates in question are:
- An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump
- An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump
- A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump
- An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump
In other words, these four vote updates alone won the vote count as it currently stands for Biden.
We merely show that the data, adjusted appropriately to remove differences in size and political leaning between states, does follow a certain pattern, and that four key vote updates deviate profoundly from that pattern. …
It is our belief that the extraordinarily anomalous nature of the studied vote updates here, combined with the staggering political implications, demands immediate and thorough investigation. …
Extensive mathematical detail is provided and the data and the code (for the data-curation, data transformation, plotting, and modeling) are all attached in the appendix to this document.
This is powerful evidence of fraud. It’s all at the link.
The perpetrator has replied. Unfortunately, his reply was neither interesting nor helpful. Your prognosis that the poster is actually delusional appears to be correct.