recapitulation

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
Recapitulation is a theory developed to improve our understanding of the Apocalypse. Victorinus of Pettau in the third century was the first to show the same events were being repeated in different visions. Therefore the sequence of chapters cannot be considered necessarily in chronological order. Most commentaries on the Apocalypse have adopted this theory. It has also been described as parallelism

see what augustine had to say about this

back to
the apocalypse

this is a recapitulation
 

Truster

New member
The resumptive interpretation is correct. It is the only method that explains what is going on around us and what has happened historically. It also opens the eyes to the future.
 

Zeke

Well-known member
we are talking about prophecy

Nothing new under the sun Ecclesiastes 1:9. So the outward focus on worldly events shows Luke 17:2-21, Acts 17:24, 1Cor 3:16, ect hasn't pierced the programming of this worlds religious rulers that keep one a slave to tradtion Galatians 4:1, 2Cor 3:6.
 

oatmeal

Well-known member
THEORIGINALBIBLELOOKEDLIKETHIS
SOWEHAVETOASSUME
THEONESWHOADDEDCHAPTERANDVERSE
KNEWWHATTHEYWEREDOING

We should never assume

They did not know what they were doing.

That they guessed can be easily demonstrated.

Chapters and verses hold no authority
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
Recapitulation is a theory developed to improve our understanding of the Apocalypse. Victorinus of Pettau in the third century was the first to show the same events were being repeated in different visions. Therefore the sequence of chapters cannot be considered necessarily in chronological order. Most commentaries on the Apocalypse have adopted this theory. It has also been described as parallelism

see what augustine had to say about this

back to
the apocalypse

without recapitulation the apocalypse cannot be understood and you are forced to put everything into the future
-also-
you might believe babylon falls just before the second coming and the thousand years follows that
-it is not easy being a futurist
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
without recapitulation the apocalypse cannot be understood and you are forced to put everything into the future
-also-
you might believe babylon falls just before the second coming and the thousand years follows that
-it is not easy being a futurist

:chuckle:

Sounds like a harebrained scheme.
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
Recapitulation is a theory developed to improve our understanding of the Apocalypse. Victorinus of Pettau in the third century was the first to show the same events were being repeated in different visions. Therefore the sequence of chapters cannot be considered necessarily in chronological order. Most commentaries on the Apocalypse have adopted this theory. It has also been described as parallelism

see what augustine had to say about this

back to
the apocalypse







The Rev was a pastoral encouragement to early churches to endure through the horrible events of the 7th decade in Judea. It can still be used pastorally for persecution etc, and songs can be used for worship. But there isn't going to be an exact repeat of those events otherwise known as the desolation of Israel, Dan 8, 9.
 
Top