Sonnet
New member
You have no right to employ Christian language to voice your anti-Christian denials.
I'll employ Christian language if I want, thanks.
Ask CR and GT if I am anti-Christian.
You are the one affirming non-Calvinists aren't saved.
You have no right to employ Christian language to voice your anti-Christian denials.
disingenuous persons . .
'Cos no one is rebutting it.
It was rebutted very simply. You refuse to abandon your false platform with wrong questions, because they're disingenuous.
I'm not debating, and you don't get to demand debate over simple conversation. My last statements stand as declaration of valid fact according to scripture and lexicography. There's no need for debate, only clarification and acceptance without obtuse continued challenge from a fallacious premise.
Your continued false claims of never being rebutted are a character issue even more than a topical issue.
I'm not debating, and you don't get to demand debate over simple conversation. My last statements stand as declaration of valid fact according to scripture and lexicography. There's no need for debate, only clarification and acceptance without obtuse continued challenge from a fallacious premise.
Your continued false claims of never being rebutted are a character issue even more than a topical issue.
That these remain without response implies that a response here would probably meet the same fate.
Paul's preaching to unbelievers that Christ died for their sins wasn't disingenuous. He meant it salvifically.
Of course Christ died for their sins. He was made (poieo) sin (singular anarthrous hamartia). Unless and until you can ever understand what those mean, you will always be framing this topic according to your false premises.
None of this means what you think it means. You are blinded to the simple truth. I can see you. Just beyond the veil. Literally. I can see you there. Blinded. Groping.
I think if you'd look carefully at the distinctions between the Supralapsarian and Infralapsarian positions, you might get a clue from their contrasts. But I doubt you will. You've not demonstrated any willingness to be served, so this will probably meet with the same fate.
You're the one playing the games, even if Calvinists don't know how to destroy your false premise. And the more you reinforce your self-determined "victory", the more accountable your become to whatever the truth is while you ignore it.
I think you remain outraged that I dared to question you here.
It's yet without response.
That these remain without response implies that a response here would probably meet the same fate.
Paul's preaching to unbelievers that Christ died for their sins wasn't disingenuous. He meant it salvifically.
Fact is Jesus told Paul he had much people in that city before Paul even got on a roll.
Before they heard or believed anything Paul said.
Imagine that, Jesus calling things that weren't as though they were.
Why should Paul even preach?
Be kinda foolish wouldn't it?
Oh, wait a minute, it pleases God to save folks by the foolishness of preaching.:doh:
So just think Sonnet, the foolishness of God is wiser than you with those uncircumcised ears.
9 Then spake the Lord to Paul in the night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold not thy peace:
10 For I am with thee, and no man shall set on thee to hurt thee: for I have much people in this city.
Those double minded such as yourself need to try.
Luke 16:9
And I say unto you, Make to yourselves friends of the mammon of unrighteousness; that, when ye fail, they may receive you into everlasting habitations.
'Cos no one is rebutting it.
Whoa!
What have we here?
A confessed non-believer weighing in with theological language pertaining to Trinitarianism?
This Forum is being snookered, fellow Christians!
Beware. And do not respond to this kind of fake troll . .
It's called "obfuscation by silence".
The Mods have made a big mistake allowing you to post here, when you begin challenging our Christian testimonies.
Especially when you go so far to weigh in on the most holy subject of the Trinity.
I'm not debating, and you don't get to demand debate over simple conversation. My last statements stand as declaration of valid fact according to scripture and lexicography. There's no need for debate, only clarification and acceptance without obtuse continued challenge from a fallacious premise.
Your continued false claims of never being rebutted are a character issue even more than a topical issue.