[
elohiym;4467664]You are reading a false doctrine into those verses that contradicts other ideas in the same epistle. I've already made several arguments that you have ignored. Jesus will tell them he never knew them, but you are claiming he will have known them contrary to 1 John 3:6.
I am not reading an interpretation into the text. The Greek language has that meaning. The Greek
present tense expresses,
repetitive or
continuous action. For instance, when
1 John 1:8 says "if we
confess our sins" the word "confess" being a present tense verb indicates
ongoing confession.
World class scholar of NT Greek A. T. Robertson confirms that this is exactly how this verse should be understood:
1 John 1:9
If we confess...if we keep on confessing." Confession of sin to God and to one another ( James 5:16 ) is urged throughout the N.T. from John the Baptist ( Mark 1:5 ) on....
The confession of sin is not a one time act but is presented as an
ongoing practice indicating that from time to time believers will be less than Christlike manner.
http://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/robertsons-word-pictures/1-john/1-john-1-9.html
Robertson was not a Catholic who believed in
ritual confession. He was a Baptist as such he might have tried to smuggle his beliefs about OSAS into the text by making confession and forgiveness a one time event that occurred at conversion. He was much too honest a scholar too do that and he would not have gotten away with it anyway.
Yet you are using his words to justify sinning on occasion.
Before I interjected my thoughts into the text I studied it in the original language. After all that was how John expressed his ideas.
John wrote, "No one who abides in Him sins; no one who sins has seen Him or knows Him." You have to argue that he means a lifestyle of sin, but then you can't say a "believer" that falls into a lifestyle of sin ever knew Jesus. Your interpretation is irrational and doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Anyone who says they are a believer and never stopped living in sin was never truly converted. The case of backslidders and apostates is covered in a later chapter of John.
But forget about what I think, let's apply Greek grammar to this verse. "No one who abides in Him
continually sins or
practices sin (as a lifestyle) (
1 John 3:6)
The idea the present tense verbs denote an
ongoing continual action is brought out in other translations:
English Standard Version
No one who
abides (habitually) in him
keeps on sinning; no one who
keeps on sinning has either seen him or known him.
Berean Study Bible
No one who remains
(continually) in Him
keeps on sinning. No one who
continues to sin has seen Him or known Him.
International Standard Version
No one who remains in union with him
keeps on sinning. The one who
keeps on sinning hasn't seen him or known him.
The KJV by using the Old English verb ending "
-eth" also indicates that the action is
ongoing:
King James Bible
Whosoever
abideth in him
sinneth not: whosoever
sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
John is saying that when a person claims to be a believer but never ceases his old worldly lifestyle he is not a real believer. When anyone is joined to Christ we should expect to see radical change . The rest of the verse is saying that believers who abide IN him cannot continue live a
lifestyle of sin. The two conditions are mutually contradictory and exlusive. The text is
not saying believers are
sinless and perfect.
You are teaching the blood of Christ is a license to sin. Stop!
The life is in the blood. The life in Christ's blood is the Spirit. It is the Spirit that cleanses us from all sin by making us incapable of sin. You claim to still sin occasionally, so can we agree you are either becoming unclean, guilty and dead when you sin, or do you think you have a license to sin occasionally?
You are mixing things that are not sin (anger) with things that will keep a person out of the kingdom (not forgiving). If you don't forgive, then you are not forgiven. That's the way it works.
[/QUOTE]
You are so right about forgiving. It is something I have had to practice and I also to deal with other people about. Anger as an emotion is not necessarily wrong but it is often closely associated with wrong as God asked Cain "Do you have a reason to be angry?" He was angry out of envy. If you are angry out of impatience that is sin too. Longsuffering is a fruit of the Spirit. "
Outbursts of anger" is a manifestation of the flesh.
…19 Now the
deeds of the flesh are evident, which are: immorality, impurity, sensuality, 20 idolatry, sorcery, enmities, strife, jealousy,
outbursts of anger,
disputes, dissensions, factions, (
Galatians 5:19-20)
Is there ever any enmities, strife, disputes, dissensions and factions among true believers, or is
anyone who exhibits these characteristics a false believer from the beginning?
That is a false doctrine, but it's hardly different from your false doctrine. You shouldn't be throwing stones in your glass house.
They are wrong, but so are you as I've pointed out.
BTW throwing stones is NOT
disagreeing with someone. It might be attacking them personally, or subjecting them to ridicule and mockery but it is not disagreement, although from what I can tell a lot of people are personally offended when anyone disagrees with them. This does not make sense as I thought this site was supposed to be a place where dissent and free discussion is allowed.