MUSK BUYS TWITTER!

[User Name]

Why does he first need to do something in order for you to be able to give him a yes or no to the question he asked you?

Are you in favor of political censorship? Yes or No?

No. But none of Jefferson's complaints about Twitter actually have to do with political censorship. That's why I wanted him to give me specific examples--so we could hash them out.

 

[Jefferson]

 

[Jefferson]

 

[User Name]

Misleading. Twitter would have won its lawsuit against Musk. He knew he would have been forced to buy anyway. That's why he folded and is now agreeing to purchase it. Musk is a bit of a dope as evidenced by his long history of false promises with vaporware. His flirtation with buying Twitter was another false promise, but they forced his hand.

 

[Jefferson]

 

[Arthur Brain]

View attachment 4431

Trump's got his self lauded Truth Social account hasn't he? That not going so well?

 

[Jefferson]

Trump's got his self lauded Truth Social account hasn't he? That not going so well?

Censorious Twitter is this issue. Not Trump.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Censorious Twitter is this issue. Not Trump.

If Trump had operated within platform rules instead of tweeting rubbish all over the place like a demented madman he wouldn't have been booted. It's not like he wasn't warned.

 

[TomO]

If Trump had operated within platform rules instead of tweeting rubbish all over the place like a demented madman he wouldn't have been booted. It's not like he wasn't warned.

Squandered opportunity will be the Trump Legacy.

 

[Arthur Brain]

Squandered opportunity will be the Trump Legacy.

Reckon his legacy will be a fair bit worse than that if it isn't already.

 

[TomO]

Reckon his legacy will be a fair bit worse than that if it isn't already.

*meh* Point taken.

 

[Jefferson]

Musk could have chosen to end homelessness in the US and hunger worldwide, but instead, he chose to buy Twitter.

The War Party could have chosen to end homelessness in the US and hunger worldwide, but instead, they chose to send billions to Ukraine.

 

[ok doser]

The War Party could have chosen to end homelessness in the US and hunger worldwide, but instead, they chose to send billions to Ukraine.

Don't forget the 10% cut that goes to the big guy!

 

[User Name]

The War Party could have chosen to end homelessness in the US and hunger worldwide, but instead, they chose to send billions to Ukraine.

The War Party is Putin and his allies in the Republican Party.

I support the defense of Ukraine from Putin's warmongering, and you support Putin's warmongering.

 

[Jefferson]

I support the defense of Ukraine from Putin's warmongering...

Instead of ending homelessness in the US and hunger worldwide?

 

[ok doser]

Instead of ending homelessness in the US and hunger worldwide?

Harder for the big guy to get his 10% cut by ending homelessness in the US and hunger worldwide.

 

[User Name]

Instead of ending homelessness in the US and hunger worldwide?

It's a bad situation. People are being murdered in Ukraine. Who knows how many? They are defending themselves courageously against the onslaught of Putin's butchery. They deserve whatever support they can get.

 

[ok doser]

Instead of ending homelessness in the US and hunger worldwide?

 

[User Name]

Defense of Ukraine equals defense of the rest of the world from Putin's tyranny. His own country is suffering bad enough under his leadership. We can't afford to allow him to export it.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Defense of Ukraine equals defense of the rest of the world from Putin's tyranny. His own country is suffering bad enough under his leadership. We can't afford to allow him to export it.

Having a strong and healthy population as one of the superpowers of the world would be an excellent deterrent against Putin and would allow us to actually defend the rest of the world from Putin's tyranny and would let us actually prevent him from exporting it.