That aspect of it doesn't bother me. There are precedents. What bothers me is the social bullying that occurs if you refuse to accept it. It's language evolution by fiat, enforced by bullies on social media.... a word suddenly flipping over night.
That aspect of it doesn't bother me. There are precedents. What bothers me is the social bullying that occurs if you refuse to accept it. It's language evolution by fiat, enforced by bullies on social media.... a word suddenly flipping over night.
Clans, mobs, gangs, groups, and nations of unsaved barbarians commonly produce violent enemies of God and good leadership.Again, by calling a spade a spade? Projection does not help. The far right in America have wingnuts in spades from Qanon nuts to election denying dopes and all manner of out there stuff between.
Qanon followers are monumentally gullible, simple as that. If being blunt amounts to 'posturing' in your book then guilty as charged. In reality, nothing of the sort.Just name-calling posturing.
You mean clans like the very pro-Republican Ku Klux Klan?Clans, mobs, gangs, groups, and nations of unsaved barbarians commonly produce violent enemies of God and good leadership.
There is hardly anyone more gullible than the rube who believes that democrats did not commit voter fraud just because they say so.Qanon followers are monumentally gullible, simple as that. If being blunt amounts to 'posturing' in your book then guilty as charged. In reality, nothing of the sort.
Democrats created the KKK to fight against republican efforts to integrate blacks into society. Democrats kept the Klan alive for decades and now that the Klan has all but dissolved the democrats dishonestly claim republicans support the Klan. What republicans support the Klan? What republicans support those who support the Klan? Confused, fake, or dishonest republicans by the handfuls maybe, but no more.You mean clans like the very pro-Republican Ku Klux Klan?

When I participated in the rabid fourth wave extremist feminist group on Reddit, I was struck by how disciplined their moderators were at quashing any discussion, any criticism of trans issues (or any criticism of Joe the Rapist for that matter).That aspect of it doesn't bother me. There are precedents. What bothers me is the social bullying that occurs if you refuse to accept it. It's language evolution by fiat, enforced by bullies on social media.
This honestly doesn't surprise me...The Gay community (At least the ones I know/have discussions with) has been annoyed in general for quite some time over this Trans stuff.When I participated in the rabid fourth wave extremist feminist group on Reddit, I was struck by how disciplined their moderators were at quashing any discussion, any criticism of trans issues (or any criticism of Joe the Rapist for that matter).
Which makes this all the more remarkable
![]()
Wow! Twitter Green Lights Anti-Trans Movement
In the history of American social movements, September 11 may take on new significance. September 11, 2022, is the day the powers that be allowed LGBWithoutTheT to trend on Twitter. In broad daylight, lesbians and gays disassociated themselves from t...www.americanthinker.com
Sheesh...I hope Tiki Torches don't become white supremacist too like the okay symbol.Democrats created the KKK to fight against republican efforts to integrate blacks into society. Democrats kept the Klan alive for decades and now that the Klan has all but dissolved the democrats dishonestly claim republicans support the Klan. What republicans support the Klan? What republicans support those who support the Klan? Confused, fake, or dishonest republicans by the handfuls maybe, but no more.
Maybe these lying leftist democrats posing as republicans also pose as Klan supporters?
View attachment 4279
When I was on the feminist group, I would be notified every time there was a new post and so I saw all the traffic as it was posted, and soon realized that much of it was being deleted. From that I was aware that there was a strong current of opposition to trans (and to Joe the Rapist) that was being silenced.This honestly doesn't surprise me...The Gay community (At least the ones I know/have discussions with) has been annoyed in general for quite some time over this Trans stuff.![]()
If I am the professor, I will assign the homework. What was the original meaning of homework and how does it differ from the current definition?
According to the OED, the original meaning of "homework" was the same as "housework."
Before you couldn't do homework at the library, now you can.
Too late:Sheesh...I hope Tiki Torches don't become white supremacist too like the okay symbol.![]()
If a dolt babbles on in a forum, are his posts ever received?What do you mean by your phrase, "meaning of homework"? Are you saying that the word, 'homework,' means something? It doesn't. Words don't mean things. Persons mean things by the words they speak, when they are speaking meaningfully. Words themselves...really they just kind of sit there, passively, getting said by some person(s) now and then—and once in a while in a cognitively meaningful way, at that. Words certainly don't say themselves.
If after the first occurrence it catches on for a period then we say the word had that meaning for that time.Do you just mean, what did the first person who said the word, 'homework,' mean by it? I don't know. Who cares? Why should anyone care about that, Professor?
Both.When you say, "Before you couldn't do homework at the library, now you can," to which are you referring by your word, "homework": to 1) homework, or to 2) housework?
YesIOW, which one of the following, two things do you mean, and which one of them do you not mean?
- "Before you couldn't do [homework] at the library, now you can"
Yes
- "Before you couldn't do [housework] at the library, now you can"
If a dolt babbles on in a forum, are his posts ever received?
If after the first occurrence it catches on for a period then we say the word had that meaning for that time.
Both.
Semantics are simply not your forte.
The meaning of words change over time (and place for that matter ie, consider regional differences). The terms woman and man are changing. Get over it.
Ok doser understands it. Doesn't agree with it but comprehends semantics. Maybe have a tutorial with him and rejoin class at a later time. Cheers.What (if anything) do you mean by that? Or, are you just treating us to the spectacle of another of your mindless emotional outbursts?
Thinking logically is clearly something you refuse to do.
Ok doser understands it. Doesn't agree with it but comprehends semantics. Maybe have a tutorial with him and rejoin class at a later time. Cheers.
What (if anything) do you mean by that?
Too late:
![]()