Little Baby Charlie

[patrick jane]

Let's all pray for baby Charlie Gard. He is in a hopeless situation. Charlie has a rare condition that leaves him blind, deaf, unable to move or breath on his own. It is terminal, but there are offers for further treatment in the USA and the Vatican. The British government will not allow the parents to move the child or even take him home to die. The hospital and the socialist government want to pull the plug on little Charlie.

 

[kiwimacahau]

As he is vegetative ...

Sent from my SM-A500Y using Tapatalk

 

[glorydaz]

As he is vegetative ...

Sent from my SM-A500Y using Tapatalk

His particular problem is under study in the USA, and there are some new treatments the parents are willing to try. Treatments that could help others with this same problem, if not Charlie, himself. It's how new medical breakthroughs come about.

 

[JudgeRightly]

As he is vegetative ...

Sent from my SM-A500Y using Tapatalk

So you're calling a human being a vegetable? Shame on you. That is a degrading term to use to describe someone who is still alive.

Related.

 

[JudgeRightly]

As he is vegetative ...

Sent from my SM-A500Y using Tapatalk

Gard is still alive, and his parents raised up about £1.3 million so that they could take care of their 10 month old child, and the government says no. Why?

Why do you think the British government wants to kill this little baby?

 

[kiwimacahau]

Gard is still alive, and his parents raised up about £1.3 million so that they could take care of their 10 month old child, and the government says no. Why?

Why do you think the British government wants to kill this little baby?

They don't but they are required by British law to listen to the primary health carers.

Sent from my SM-A500Y using Tapatalk

 

[kiwimacahau]

So you're calling a human being a vegetable? Shame on you. That is a degrading term to use to describe someone who is still alive.

Related.

He is in a vegetative state. I am not ashamed to use the correct medical term.

Sent from my SM-A500Y using Tapatalk

 

[JudgeRightly]

They don't but they are required by British law to listen to the primary health carers.

Sent from my SM-A500Y using Tapatalk

The parents of a 10 month old child want to let their child live, and the "primary health carers" want to murder him. Who do you think is the person who should have priority? The parents or the wannabe murderers?

 

[JudgeRightly]

He is in a vegetative state. I am not ashamed to use the correct medical term.

Sent from my SM-A500Y using Tapatalk

He is living. That is the correct medical term. To intentionally kill an innocent person is called murder.

 

[fool]

They don't but they are required by British law to listen to the primary health carers.

And they say there is no hope so let someone else try.
If they pull the plug when the parents have the means to take him somewhere for treatment no matter how slim the chance then they should be declared a terrorist organization and bombed into the stone age.

 

[kiwimacahau]

And they say there is no hope so let someone else try.
If they pull the plug when the parents have the means to take him somewhere for treatment no matter how slim the chance then they should be declared a terrorist organization and bombed into the stone age.

Wrong.

Sent from my SM-A500Y using Tapatalk

 

[fool]

Wrong.

Sent from my SM-A500Y using Tapatalk

We'll send an Aircraft Carrier Group to take your complaint.

 

[glassjester]

And they say there is no hope so let someone else try.
If they pull the plug when the parents have the means to take him somewhere for treatment no matter how slim the chance then they should be declared a terrorist organization and bombed into the stone age.

I wonder if the same could be said for nations that kill the unborn.

 

[fool]

I wonder if the same could be said for nations that kill the unborn.

Too bad there's no one bigger.

 

[glassjester]

Too bad there's no one bigger.

There is. But His kingdom is not of this world.

 

[fool]

There is. But His kingdom is not of this world.

Doesn't do us much good then does it?

 

[glassjester]

Doesn't do us much good then does it?

Oh, I think He does do much good.

 

[fool]

Oh, I think He does do much good.

Well maybe he could jump on this case that we're talking about here.

 

[glassjester]

Well maybe he could jump on this case that we're talking about here.

Agreed. There's something worth praying for.

 

[JudgeRightly]

Wrong.

Sent from my SM-A500Y using Tapatalk

Where there's life, there's hope.

You would have an innocent little baby murdered just because his condition isn't treatable.

You're just like the Nazis, killing those germans in their own hospitals who were sick or diseased or even slightly infirm, because they were, according to them, a drain on society.

The parents want to care for the baby until he dies, which will be a tragedy, of course, but it's never wrong to die.

The UK government and the medical doctors who are supposed to take care of their patients are wanting to murder this innocent little baby because of their bloodlust. It's never wrong to die. But it is always wrong to wrongfully kill someone. It is always wrong to murder.