elohiym
Well-known member
First let me note that the only one's around here with an ounce of class appear to be Knight, Lighthouse, One Eyed Jack and nicholsmom.
...until you disagree with them. But thanks for sharing that bit of irrelevant trivia.
One would think that so-called "Christians" would be elated about someone that had struggled with a sin as detestable as homosexuality all of his life...
And one would think that so-called "Christians" would not want to put him to death now that he has repented, and that so-called "Christians" would have a consistent theology that treated all capital offenders the same.
You can't directly answer my questions without showing your position to be hypocritical and lacking integrity. Keep evading the questions; you prove my point about you well. :thumb:
As I mentioned before, the man is now a "traitor" to the atheists and phony Christians that promote the homosexual lifestyle
Irrelevant to my point and the questions I asked you.
You're one of them elo.
Be clear. What are you falsely accusing me of now? :idunno:
Now, to answer your question:
Cutting and pasting garbage commentaries by foolish men is all you can do? How does that convoluted nonsense answer any of my questions? It doesn't.
What it did was attempt to make the fallacious moral law vs. ceremonial law argument, proving that Doug Beaumont is just as much a liberal Christian as you.
Tell us, when someone broke the sabbath, was it unceremonial or immoral? :dunce:
And now to answer this question:
I wouldn't give a phony Christian like you the time of day, let alone tell you anything about me.
You speak volumes about yourself.
Well, we can see that you are just full of hot air and your theology lacks integrity and grace. You couldn't even give a straight answer for what you believe, just cut and past nonsense irrelevant to the questions asked.