Justice Kennedy needs a reminder about his own fear of harm from gay marriage

[chrysostom]

In the case of Philomena,

it was a hatchet job on the church
and
completely misrepresents the all the good that has been done

even if

the story was true

 

[chrysostom]

You obviously have had little interaction with adoptees. The terms used are birth parents and adoptive parents to differentiate between the two. Calling one set of parents 'real' is an insult to both.

Also, orphans are children whose birth parents are deceased. I am also curious if you are aware that some dioceses were more diligent in checking the true nature of prospective parents than others. It is not unheard of for the church to give children to abusers, alcoholics, or women having a hard time getting over a miscarriage to 'placate' her instead of actually helping her.

I gave you three choices
and
now I will give you the answer

finding good homes for orphans is the most important

that was easy

 

[Sitamun]

I gave you three choices
and
now I will give you the answer

finding homes for orphans is the most important

that was easy

So any home as long as the parents are straight and catholic? Regardless of what kind of parents and what kind of homelife they provide?

 

[chrysostom]

So any home as long as the parents are straight and catholic? Regardless of what kind of parents and what kind of homelife they provide?

sorry

I meant to say good homes

I will edit

 

[annabenedetti]

it was a hatchet job on the church
and
completely misrepresents the all the good that has been done

even if

the story was true

The story is true. And what a sad story it is.

 

[chrysostom]

The story is true. And what a sad story it is.

well get over it
and
you will have no trouble finding that kind of stuff
if
that is what you are looking for

 

[TracerBullet]

You see no meaning in blood ties, in ancestry, in biology????

How would any of these make a child less worthy of protection?

 

[TracerBullet]

you want horrors
who has done more
when it comes to placing orphans in good homes?
and
they were forced out of business because they would not accept same sex couples

so what does this tell you?

accepting same sex couples is more important than placing orphans in good homes
and
that says it all

you mean playing politics and promoting discrimination is more important than placing orphans in good homes

 

[GFR7]

How would any of these make a child less worthy of protection?

It doesn't. But concerning the future, third party reproduction should be heavily regulated, for the protection of children's rights.

 

[TracerBullet]

It doesn't.

so why do you keep bringing it up?

 

[Rusha]

How would any of these make a child less worthy of protection?

It doesn't. But concerning the future, third party reproduction should be heavily regulated, for the protection of children's rights.

so why do you keep bringing it up?

Good question.

 

[GFR7]

so why do you keep bringing it up?

You cut off the most important part of the post! Wow. :doh:

 

[GFR7]

Good question.

Those practices should be discouraged and much of it stopped altogether. Unless you just really don't care about children's rights. I for one, do.

 

[GFR7]

How would any of these make a child less worthy of protection?

So adults can do whatever the heck they wish with reproduction and children's lives , so long as the government makes sure to put in place protections? Got it.

 

[chrysostom]

you mean playing politics and promoting discrimination is more important than placing orphans in good homes

actually it is two guys living together
that is
more important than placing orphans in a good home

 

[annabenedetti]

well get over it
and
you will have no trouble finding that kind of stuff
if
that is what you are looking for

Get over yourself.

 

[Rusha]

Those practices should be discouraged and much of it stopped altogether..

Your opinion has been noted and rejected.

Unless you just really don't care about children's rights. I for one, do.

No, you don't. You pretend to care about them as a way to further your agenda. Otherwise, you wouldn't insinuate that biological children are superior to other children, including those who are adopted.

 

[chrysostom]

You pretend to care about them as a way to further your agenda.

what is his agenda?

 

[Rusha]

what is his agenda?

Anti-gay, pro-patriarchy (he used material from such a site on ACW's thread), anti-woman.

 

[chrysostom]

Anti-gay, pro-patriarchy (he used material from such a site on ACW's thread), anti-woman.

how do you know that?
and
why is that his agenda?

ultimately you have to accuse him of being for something
or
protecting something