Cross Reference
New member
However, if one, like you believes his past, present and futures sins are all forgiven in advance, why not sin? What have you to lose?Grace and forgiveness bestowed by God is not a license to continue in unrepentant sin.
However, if one, like you believes his past, present and futures sins are all forgiven in advance, why not sin? What have you to lose?Grace and forgiveness bestowed by God is not a license to continue in unrepentant sin.
However, if one, like you believes his past, present and futures sins are all forgiven in advance, why not sin? What have you to lose?
Though they do not lose the inheritance; they lose its reward.
What inheritance?
What they sew now has an eternal impact on said reward then.
What reward?
They also reap in the flesh; what they sew to the flesh in other ways.
What does that mean?
The impact of the death in the flesh that God warned Adam of (impact of the bondage of corruption) is not to be mocked; it is real and in all its forms.
Death IN the flesh???
HTML:One might enjoy their breaking of driving speed limits; but severely negative physical consequences it has continued to be known to have.
Again??? I don't follow you.
And then there is plain old gratitude for His unspeakable gift.
Which is nothing if one does not continue in Christ.
However, if one, like you believes his past, present and futures sins are all forgiven in advance, why not sin? What have you to lose?
Where there is no active exercise of repentance, there is no evidence of salvation.
As you've been asked, over, and over, Nag-just how much repentance, is required, to be "proven" as one of "the elect." What evidence is needed-specifics-eternal destinies are at stake, toots.
How about we have a "look see" at your resume. How do we know you meet this " no active exercise of repentance, there is no evidence of salvation" bar?
A Muslim can have "active exercise of repentance" And?
And define this fuzzy....subjective...
active exercise of repentance
Let me guess: You know you are one of "the elect," because your lifestyle tells you so.
You would not persist with this argument, if you had a clue about what true repentance is.
Witness, the...
![]()
Like the kind of repetance Judas exhibited, Nag? Or the kind the LORD God exhibited?
Or perhaps this kind?:
"Any person who lives his life wrongly and does not repent of his sins, will be held responsible and judged for breaking God's laws and are justly consigned to death and hell. Sinners only receive what they have earned. Men reap what they sow."-Nag
=perverting the gospel of Christ
You made the "argument." Now, again, just how much repentance, is required, to be "proven" as one of "the elect." What evidence is needed-specifics-eternal destinies are at stake, toots.
How about we have a "look see" at your resume. How do we know you meet this " no active exercise of repentance, there is no evidence of salvation" bar?
A Muslim can have "active exercise of repentance" And?
And define this fuzzy....subjective...
active exercise of repentance
Of course.
Christ most certainly made salvation available for all men as scripture teaches repeatedly.
Forgiveness (grace) is continual in the life of a regenerated Christian. Justification is a fixed legal rendering, but sanctification is ongoing, thus a believer confesses his sins daily.
A truly born again soul anguishes against sinfulness. Where there is no active exercise of repentance, there is no evidence of salvation.
What is to lose? Credibility of witness and bringing shame upon the righteous name of Jesus Christ.
Repentance is not the same as human remorse, Johnny.
Repentance is a Godly ability to turn from sin, granted only by the grace of God: II Timothy 2:25; Acts 3:26, 5:31, 11:18
But then you have been given this answer before, but you do not have ears to hear . . .
There very certainly is. What I've said is the precise and exact exegetical truth of scripture, whether anyone understands it or not; and most won't and can't because they're English thinkers/speakers who can't divest themselves of their grammatical error-induced presuppostional perceptions.
Cognitive dissonance prevents you from seeing the conclusion.
However, if one, like you believes his past, present and futures sins are all forgiven in advance, why not sin? What have you to lose?
I believe John was allowed to see the final Judgment of mankind as it took place. It wasn't a vision or a dream. He was witnessing the real event as it took place.
Are you a Preterist :chuckle:
I owed you that one![]()