Derf
Well-known member
You making a statement restating a previous statement of yours is supposed to show that you know what you're talking about?
For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud
- Thread starter Arthur Brain
- Start date
way 2 go
Well-known member
invective, ridicule and irrational demands for "cites."
and
confession through projection
Under pressure, Michael Flynn was coerced into lying. And now he is suing the corrupt officials who set him up.
The evidence against Dominion and leftist election workers is overwhelming.
Forensic audit finds that security log files were deleted from all Dominion machines to hide vote switching | SGT Report
Monday, November 28, 2022
ALERT: On October 15, 2020 YouTube terminated BOTH SGT Report YouTube channels without warning or cause. On October 22, 2020 Patreon terminated the SGT Report Patreon page without warning or cause. This is economic warfare friends.
Forensic audit finds that security log files were deleted from all Dominion machines to hide vote switching
December 16, 2020
by Lance D Johnson, Natural News:
After election officials identified “glitches” that switched 6,000 Trump votes to Biden, the courts in Antrim County Michigan ordered an audit of Dominion voting machines. The forensic audit was carried out by the Allied Security Operations Group (ASOG). This group conducted a forensic duplication on the county’s election management server. They investigated compact flash cards used by local precincts in their Dominion ImageCast system, and they audited the memory sticks used by Dominion Voter Assist Terminals and the memory sticks used for the poll book.
This forensic audit found blatant evidence of a coordinated attack on the 2020 Presidential election. The Federal Election Commission allows an error rate of .0008 percent for all voting machines used in US elections. The Dominion machines in Antrim county had an error rate of 68.05 percent! Even more shocking: The ballot-adjudication logs and the security logs for the November 3 general election were removed. All log files for previous elections were still contained on the machines, but someone on the inside was able to erase the all-important log files for the 2020 election.
There was a coordinated attempt to coverup security logs that show wide scale vote switching
“The adjudication process is the simplest way to manually manipulate votes,” wrote Russell Ramsland, who prepared the forensic report. “The lack of records prevents any form of audit accountability, and their conspicuous absence is extremely suspicious since the files exist for previous years using the same software. We must conclude that the 2020 election cycle records have been manually removed.”
This bombshell report was released to the public on Dec 14 after it was approved by Kevin Elsenheimer, the chief judge of Michigan’s 13th Circuit Court.
“Because the intentional high error rate generates large numbers of ballots to be adjudicated by election personnel, we must deduce that bulk adjudication occurred,” Ramsland warned. “However, because files and adjudication logs are missing, we have not yet determined where the bulk adjudication occurred or who was responsible for it.” In other words, Democrats premeditated and coordinated their attack on the US election system, tampering with the security logs to cover up their fraud.
In Antrim County, the voting machines rejected an outrageous number of ballots for adjudication. In the adjudication process, election workers are allowed to determine the ultimate outcome for each ballot. The Dominion voting machines were apparently programmed to reject a large number of ballots so the corrupt Democrat election workers could ultimately decide the destiny for these ballots. This coordinated fraud will be hard to trace because the traitors deleted all the security logs prior to 11 p.m. on Nov. 4 and deleted adjudication logs.
Dominion voting system rejected an astronomical number of ballots so they could be manually switched
The security logs are the only way to conduct an audit trail and to detect for more advanced outside attacks on the system files. Ramsland warned that there “is not reasonable explanation for the security logs to be missing.” The logs contain all the authentication failures, domain controls, and error codes. They also contain information on the network connections to the file servers, which includes the times, date transfers, internet connections, and file accesses.
Watch him lose.
Sidney Powell: "No reasonable person would believe my claims about widespread voter fraud."
Jenna Ellis: "I made ten misrepresentations about the 2020 election."
Rupert Murdoch: "Lou Dobbs, Maria Bartiromo, Jeanine Pirro and Sean Hannity endorsed false election claims on my network."
Any questions?
He might lose. Jesus lost. John the Baptist lost. Nearly every one of the 12 Apostles lost in the world's eyes when the devil and his demonic followers put them to death, but they did not really lose. The losers here are those who refuse to humble themselves before God and repent of their sins.
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
Why do you continue making them, then, since you agree that widespread voter fraud occurred?
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
What possessed you to do so, @User Name?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Oh, but you consider it substantive to accuse someone of wanting to destroy a country?
Telling...
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Has Murdoch added Tucker Carlson to that list yet?
Derf
Well-known member
Indeed. And supporting policies or policy makers that want to destroy a country is certainly substantive. If I were doing so, I wouldn't like it if someone told me the truth about it, but calling the person doofus and nut completely obscures the issue in favor of a shutdown in communication between the two opinions--which is telling, don't you think?
7djengo7
This space intentionally left blank
LOL
I know, right? That's a hilarious omission on the part of @User Name in his fabrication/palming off of fake Rupert Murdoch quotes.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
No, it isn't, it's overblown hyperbole in want of an actual argument and generally utilized by people lacking the ability to formulate a sensible, opposing one. Folk like that don;t want communication so I'm not wasting time on it and anyone who accuses me of crap like that is a nut - and frankly, that's putting it mildly.
Derf
Well-known member
Do you not see calling someone able to formulate reasonable enough sentence structure, so as to get such a message across to one so erudite as yourself, a doofus as hyperbolic?
And have you noticed that the angrier you get, the more grammatical/typing mistakes you make?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Nah. If someone has a salient point to make then they can do it with reason and common sense without recourse to overblown hyperbole. It ain't that difficult. If they do then I'm inclined to engage. Otherwise, nah. They can be called a nut and with justification at that.
In regards to your latter then of course not.
Derf
Well-known member
Then why won't you do it?
Does it help you to speak in third person, as if you're not the one engaging in such hyperbole?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
I do, with those who can engage like rational people and who can debate on point without trolling or leveling pathetic accusations.
Find an example of me accusing someone of something so hyperbolic and you may yet have a point. Otherwise, I've been called everything from flaming faggot to the leftard/libtard crap and all sorts around here other the years so with respect dude, get a clue as well as a grip, or go waste time with someone else.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Should be interesting!