For Those Who Still Insist That There Was Election Fraud

way 2 go

Well-known member
According to the Census, the recorded number of people voting in 2020 was tallied at 154,628,000. On the other hand, official results place the number of actual ballots cast slightly north of 158 million. That’s a discrepancy of nearly four million votes.

Speaking to pollster Richard Baris during an episode of “Inside the Numbers,” lawyer Robert Barnes said historically, the Census tends to “pin on the nose” the recorded vote numbers with the actual results. In other words, often the two data sets reasonably match.
Barnes is right. For example, the bureau was nearly spot-on in 2008, slightly under reporting that 131,100,000 voted, while the official results showed 131,300,000 ballots cast.
 

way 2 go

Well-known member
The Queen of England is set to announce on Monday that citizens will be required to show IDs in order to vote in general elections. There is no word on if the Biden administration will be issuing sanctions against the nation's oldest ally
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
The Queen of England is set to announce on Monday that citizens will be required to show IDs in order to vote in general elections. There is no word on if the Biden administration will be issuing sanctions against the nation's oldest ally
Not Jim Crow - Jim Pterodactyl!
 

Leatherneck

Well-known member
Temp Banned
What's the deal?



There's only a few more days until Trump is removed from office. If there was any such evidence then why is it coming to nothing and why are so many now distancing themselves away from these claims?
Anyone who believes there wasn’t election fraud is either a complete political hack or has no live brain cells.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
According to the Census, the recorded number of people voting in 2020 was tallied at 154,628,000. On the other hand, official results place the number of actual ballots cast slightly north of 158 million. That’s a discrepancy of nearly four million votes.
A total and complete lie, as expected. The truth can be found here if your interested, which you aren't: https://www.reuters.com/article/fac...on-than-official-results-showed-idUSL2N2N41N8

That's why the goofs from your side of the argument have been sent packing from every court they've gone into.
 
Last edited:

way 2 go

Well-known member
A total and complete lie, as expected. The truth can be found here if your interested, which you aren't: https://www.reuters.com/article/fac...on-than-official-results-showed-idUSL2N2N41N8

That's why the goofs from your side of the argument have been sent packing from every court they've gone into.
no lie
the recorded number of people voting in 2020 was tallied at 154,628,000.

official results place the number of actual ballots cast slightly north of 158 million. That’s a discrepancy of nearly four million votes.


Barnes is right. For example, the bureau was nearly spot-on in 2008, slightly under-reporting that 131,100,000 voted, while the official results showed 131,300,000 ballots cast.


Of course, sometimes the Census has missed the mark. But for decades, in almost every case where the Census grossly botched the results, it was because the bureau over-recorded the number of those who voted.


Consider the following: In 1992, the Census over recorded the official results by slightly more than nine million. In 1996, the Census again over recorded the number of reported voters by roughly nine million. Similarly, the bureau recorded the number of those who voted in the 2004 election as 125 million, while official results placed the total at 122 million.


The same over-recording phenomenon occurred in 2012, with the Census over-reporting the number of voters by several million. In fact, even in 2016 where the Census was quite close, it still over-recorded the official election results.

Barnes asked, “Why are there five million more ballots counted in the presidential election than reported voting according to the Census data, which has almost always been accurate?” He continued, “Isn’t it amazing that it [under reporting] is almost exactly the number of questionable Biden ballots?”
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Yes lie

I'll say it again: If the goofs on your side of the argument had any evidence to back up their claims, they wouldn't have been sent packing from every court they've been into, especially by conservative judges. But, go ahead and keep up the fraud that Trump won...feed your strong delusion.
 

Leatherneck

Well-known member
Temp Banned
Yes lie

I'll say it again: If the goofs on your side of the argument had any evidence to back up their claims, they wouldn't have been sent packing from every court they've been into, especially by conservative judges. But, go ahead and keep up the fraud that Trump won...feed your strong delusion.
Not conservative judges political hacks.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Not conservative judges political hacks.
Well, so much for the Trump presidency then. You can throw the whole thing in the dumpster now. I thought Trump's legacy as president was supposed to be all those conservative judges he appointed, but you've just informed me that they are political hacks. Hacks for whom? Not Trump, obviously. And if they are not hacks for Trump, then they are not hacks for MAGA either. So this whole thing has been an utter and complete failure for sure.
 

Leatherneck

Well-known member
Temp Banned
Well, so much for the Trump presidency then. You can throw the whole thing in the dumpster now. I thought Trump's legacy as president was supposed to be all those conservative judges he appointed, but you've just informed me that they are political hacks. Hacks for whom? Not Trump, obviously. And if they are not hacks for Trump, then they are not hacks for MAGA either. So this whole thing has been an utter and complete failure for sure.
You do understand there are a lot of Otraitors slugs that are federal judges ?
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
You do understand there are a lot of Otraitors slugs that are federal judges ?
I do understand that there are a lot of Trump appointees that are federal judges. Trump appointed 3 of them to the Supreme Court. Not one of them stood up for him. Not one. They're all hacks, but they're not hacking for Trump. And if they are not hacking for Trump, then they are not hacking for MAGA either. Oh well, it's over now for sure. We've all been had. Too bad.
 

Derf

Well-known member
A total and complete lie, as expected. The truth can be found here if your interested, which you aren't: https://www.reuters.com/article/fac...on-than-official-results-showed-idUSL2N2N41N8

That's why the goofs from your side of the argument have been sent packing from every court they've gone into.
Did you read what the goofs from your side said in that article? It’s attack of the straw men!
Next, did you read what you were responding to? Your goofs didn’t, so I don’t expect you did either. Read before you post, Goofus.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
That’s why we’re doing the audits—court cases are for liberals to change the law against the will of the majority. Audits are for conservatives to show the will of the majority.
Good luck overturning the election with those audits!
 

Derf

Well-known member
Good luck overturning the election with those audits!
It might not happen, especially with the presidential election. But it only has to show the fraud that Biden is if he stays in office, not to mention the rest of the party.
 
Top