kmoney said:HA, ..... I've always answered "No" to questions like that...
sorry to disappoint you but no progress has been made. haha.
Man! Disapointed is right! That's for sure. :nono:
Is the "no" answer an honest one or not?
kmoney said:HA, ..... I've always answered "No" to questions like that...
sorry to disappoint you but no progress has been made. haha.
OkI agree that it is a powerful argument but it very simply is not the only way that God could know that future. If every event is the only possible result of whatever caused it to happen then God could simply follow the causal chain of events in His mind and thereby know the future without having to create it. And I'm sure that if we thought about it we could come up with even more ways by which the future could be known which actually makes my argument even more powerful than philosophizer's because it makes no difference how or by what means God knows the future because my argument is simply based on the definition of the term "free will".
Sorry, I'll try to explain why I disagree. I'm saying this....God knowing the future doesn't sufficient to nullify our free will. What could nullify our free will is HOW God knows the future.You don't get to just simply disagree Kevin, that's dishonest (intellectually). I'm mean if you want to reject the conclusion that's fine but it's irrational to do so without rejecting at least one of the premises upon which the conclusion is based. To just flatly disagree is the equivalent of saying, "I don't like it so it isn't true". It doesn't work that way.
I thought I remember you saying in an earlier post that the future doesn't exist so God can't know it. Am I wrong?This is a fine syllogism but I think the weak point here is premise two, "For God to know the future God would have to create it."
Is that not illogical?Well first of all God did not come into being from nothing, He didn't come into being at all, He's just always been.
Yet if those feelings are expectations what then?kmoney said:Knight,
I don't know.....but if God has knowledge of what will happen that doesn't mean He can't have feelings about that knowledge.
Kevin
Clete said:Man! Disapointed is right! That's for sure. :nono:
Is the "no" answer an honest one or not?
Why is that simple logic so hard for some to understand???kmoney said:Yes....The "No" is an honest answer. If God has perfect foreknowledge than no, you would not be able to act differently because that would negate that perfect foreknowledge.
Kevin
Knight said:Why is that simple logic so hard for some to understand???
I think he's saying He doesn't understand why Israel would not follow Him. He promised them the good life and yet, they still chose their own way. He's saying "Throw me a frickin bone here! what did I need to do for them to follow me!"Knight said:Yet if those feelings are expectations what then?
Humor me . . .
What do you think God is trying to say about His foreknowledge regarding Israel....
Isaiah 5:1 Now let me sing to my Well-beloved A song of my Beloved regarding His vineyard: My Well-beloved has a vineyard On a very fruitful hill. 2 He dug it up and cleared out its stones, And planted it with the choicest vine. He built a tower in its midst, And also made a winepress in it; So He expected it to bring forth good grapes, But it brought forth wild grapes. 3 “And now, O inhabitants of Jerusalem and men of Judah, Judge, please, between Me and My vineyard. 4 What more could have been done to My vineyard That I have not done in it? Why then, when I expected it to bring forth good grapes, Did it bring forth wild grapes?
:bang:kmoney said:HAHA, this is what is going to frustrate you.....
I still believe that God's foreknowledge on it's own does not negate our free will. What I DO think could negate our free will is HOW God knows the future. IF God can know the future WITHOUT creating it, then I believe that foreknowledge does not nullify our free will. But if God has to create the future to know it than yes, we have no free will.
Kevin
Shouldn't He have known?kmoney said:He's saying "Throw me a frickin bone here! what did I need to do for them to follow me!"
But that isn't what the verse says.kmoney said:I think he's saying He doesn't understand why Israel would not follow Him. He promised them the good life and yet, they still chose their own way. He's saying "Throw me a frickin bone here! what did I need to do for them to follow me!"
Kevin
No.philosophizer said:Shouldn't He have known?
Do we have a smilie with a head that just starts spinning and then eventually just falls off?kmoney said:
Knight,Knight said:But that isn't what the verse says.
God says He EXPECTED good grapes. How could you feel comfortable flatly changing the verse just to suit your theology?
P.S. Your explanation doesn't really help your position because if God has perfect foreknowledge He would indeed understand why Israel produced "wild grapes".
My response doesn't fit the theology of God knowing the future.How could you feel comfortable flatly changing the verse just to suit your theology?
The verse says, "What more could have been done....". So isn't that God asking what could have been done for them to follow God?4 What more could have been done to My vineyard That I have not done in it? Why then, when I expected it to bring forth good grapes, Did it bring forth wild grapes?
If I said otherwise I apologize, because I agree with that. He would know "why".P.S. Your explanation doesn't really help your position because if God has perfect foreknowledge He would indeed understand why Israel produced "wild grapes".
Knight said:Do we have a smilie with a head that just starts spinning and then eventually just falls off?
I said....Knight said:Do we have a smilie with a head that just starts spinning and then eventually just falls off?
:chuckle:Poly said:Or how about a smilie who takes his brain out and throws it out the window.
kmoney said:If God has foreknowledge it is of His creation. He couldn't formulate other scenarios to find out what the Israelites would have done.