Biblical and Political Arguments Against Democracy

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Berean

Well-known member
aharvey said:
It's an insect angel, of course! Actually, it's an upside down picture I took of a cicada in the process of emerging from its nymphal case. It is kinda surreal, isn't it? The avatar-size version doesn't do it justice.
No offense but bugs make me :vomit:

:chuckle:
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
aharvey said:
Sorry, Jefferson, I don't see how Mark 9 shows or implies this in any way, shape, or form. Simply repeating the assertion doesn't count as documenting it (it's amazing how often I say that here at TOL).
Do you actually think our politicians campaign for office so they can become altruistic social servants and not for personal power?
 

aharvey

New member
Jefferson said:
Do you actually think our politicians campaign for office so they can become altruistic social servants and not for personal power?
Sorry, Jefferson, I don't see how Mark 9 shows or implies this in any way, shape, or form either! Do you simply fail to understand the point I am making? That, so far, none of the Biblical passages quoted have anything whatsoever to do with the so-called "Biblical arguments against democracy" they are being (mis)used to "support."
 

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
God did desire a king for Israel, eventually. Just not when they wanted one. But, because He is affected by us, He gave them one when they demanded one. And God knew He would probably regret it, and He did. But that doesn't mean He never wanted them to have a king at all.
 

Aethril

New member
Lighthouse said:
God did desire a king for Israel, eventually. Just not when they wanted one. But, because He is affected by us, He gave them one when they demanded one. And God knew He would probably regret it, and He did. But that doesn't mean He never wanted them to have a king at all.
Agreed. Deut 17:15 you shall surely set a king over you whom the LORD your God chooses...
 

Jukia

New member
Jefferson said:
Do you actually think our politicians campaign for office so they can become altruistic social servants and not for personal power?
Do you think that Pastor Enyart's monarch will not be interested in personal power? If so your understanding of human nature is sorely lacking.
 

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
Jukia said:
Do you think that Pastor Enyart's monarch will not be interested in personal power? If so your understanding of human nature is sorely lacking.
Whether he desires it or not, he doesn't get his position because he desires it. Nor does he get personal power, anyway. He can't change the Constitution.:nono:
 

Jukia

New member
Lighthouse said:
Whether he desires it or not, he doesn't get his position because he desires it. Nor does he get personal power, anyway. He can't change the Constitution.:nono:
He doesn't have to change the Constitution. He controls everything--the judiciary, the military, land use, enforces the criminal law,decides where to spend tax $, and no one can prosecute him if he violates the Constitution because he "awaits the Judgment of God"

Oh, yeah, that'll work.
 

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
Jukia said:
He doesn't have to change the Constitution. He controls everything--the judiciary, the military, land use, enforces the criminal law,decides where to spend tax $, and no one can prosecute him if he violates the Constitution because he "awaits the Judgment of God"

Oh, yeah, that'll work.
He can't raise taxes, though. And, I do agree that he should be answerable to more than just God, however, the kings of Israel weren't, and there were many kings that ruled properly.
 

Jukia

New member
Lighthouse said:
He can't raise taxes, though. And, I do agree that he should be answerable to more than just God, however, the kings of Israel weren't, and there were many kings that ruled properly.
And your only concern is taxes?

Fine, I'll make a deal with you, you dont have to pay any taxes, but we'll start a new Gulag system in the US and you can be one of the first "workers". For chuckles, read the book Gulag and find out what an unrestrained ruler can do. Remember that fallen nature of man some of you are always dragging out? Guess what, even monarchs would have it.

The only thing that is more moronic than Enyart's Constitution is Walt Brown's hydroplate theory.
 

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
Jukia said:
And your only concern is taxes?

Fine, I'll make a deal with you, you dont have to pay any taxes, but we'll start a new Gulag system in the US and you can be one of the first "workers". For chuckles, read the book Gulag and find out what an unrestrained ruler can do. Remember that fallen nature of man some of you are always dragging out? Guess what, even monarchs would have it.

The only thing that is more moronic than Enyart's Constitution is Walt Brown's hydroplate theory.
No, taxes are not my only concern. Nor do I think that not paying any taxes is right. And I misspoke earlier. I meant we should drop sales tax, not income tax. But I do believe inheritance tax is wrong. And so is property tax.

Have you read any of the accounts of the kings of Israel? I know they were fallen. And many of them did things they should not have done. And they were only answerable to God. But there were those who did good, as well. Even some who are known for doing both. And that's the way it is in any government. No one thinks that things would be different under this kind of rule. We only perceive that it would be better than majority rule/democracy/democratic republic.
 

Jukia

New member
Lighthouse said:
No, taxes are not my only concern. Nor do I think that not paying any taxes is right. And I misspoke earlier. I meant we should drop sales tax, not income tax. But I do believe inheritance tax is wrong. And so is property tax.

Have you read any of the accounts of the kings of Israel? I know they were fallen. And many of them did things they should not have done. And they were only answerable to God. But there were those who did good, as well. Even some who are known for doing both. And that's the way it is in any government. No one thinks that things would be different under this kind of rule. We only perceive that it would be better than majority rule/democracy/democratic republic.
Whatever it is you are smoking or drinking---I want some.
 

Lighthouse

The Dark Knight
Gold Subscriber
Hall of Fame
I don't smoke. And as far as drinks, I'm a rum man. But I would like to try a Vesper Martini.
 

Jukia

New member
Lighthouse said:
I don't smoke. And as far as drinks, I'm a rum man. But I would like to try a Vesper Martini.
Never been into rum or martini's. A good single malt scotch does it for me. My kids are beer drinkers, when they have $ they get decent beer, when broke it is PBR.
 

fool

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
Jefferson said:
Do you actually think our politicians campaign for office so they can become altruistic social servants and not for personal power?
I don't get this at all.
Winning office means a million things to do, not enough resources to do them, a little less than half the people slightly to moderatly pissed at you, the press prying into every corner of your life, and to top it all off Jefferson acusing you of being power hungry.
I'd say being rich would bring more power then winning office.
 

aharvey

New member
Random number today = 5:

Biblical argument against democracy: "As in the modern vernacular, the Bible calls governing officials 'authorities': Titus 3"

Well, for the life of me, I don't see how this can be construed as a Biblical argument against democracy! Let's see...

As we do in our modern democracy, the Bible calls governing officials "authorities," which somehow demonstrates that the Bible, although in agreement with our democratic society on this (utterly trivial, and translation-specific) point, opposes that same democracy.


Is that it? Bob E, you gotta help us out here! So far your supposed Biblical arguments against democracy have either nothing whatsoever to do with the Biblical passages you claim to derive them from, or else, as in the present case, they simply make no sense whatsoever. And since these passages have been chosen by a random number generator, I'm starting to suspect that this problem permeates your entire case.
 

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
aharvey said:
Today my random number generator spat out 14, which brings us to how Mark 9
supposedly tells us that "The desire to rule over others lurks among the vulgar lusts."

Let's see, Mark 9, Mark 9, where is there anything in Mark 9 about the desire to rule? Vulgar lusts? Hmm, this is about as close as I can get:

33 Jesus and his disciples went to his home in Capernaum. After they were inside the house, Jesus asked them, "What were you arguing about along the way?" 34 They had been arguing about which one of them was the greatest, and so they did not answer. 35 After Jesus sat down and told the twelve disciples to gather around him, he said, "If you want the place of honor, you must become a slave and serve others!"

Once again, that's some creativity to redirect this from the fairly obvious interpretation ("I'm the greatest apostle!") to a governmental interpretation ("I'm in charge!").
Jesus was referring to government. He was referring to His comming kingdom - "So Jesus said to them, 'Assuredly I say to you, that in the regeneration, when the Son of Man sits on the throne of His glory, you who have followed Me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.'" (Matthew 19:28)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top