Autism Link to Vaccines

Status
Not open for further replies.

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
A new study published in the September 2014 volume of the Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology reveals a significant correlation between autism disorder (AD) and MMR, Varicella (chickenpox) and Hepatitis-A vaccines.

Read more: http://christiannews.net/2014/10/31...vaccines-made-with-cells-from-aborted-babies/

Nothing good can come from the bodies of aborted babies.

Agree- they can be made from other things.

Certainly these discoveries by SCPI should generate an immediate investigation by FDA officials, if not an outright ban on the use of aborted fetal cell lines as substrates for vaccine production. There are numerous other non-human FDA-approved cell lines that can and should be used.

Seems like they want some people harmed doesn't it, since they keep doing what they know causes harm. I think in the end its all about $$ for a lot of them.
 

Alate_One

Well-known member
Agree- they can be made from other things.
They're not made from the "bodies of aborted babies".

They're made from cell lines which were, decades ago, derived from parts of aborted fetuses in *some*cases.

It's like claiming anything made from HeLa cells are made from the "body" of a woman that's been dead for over 30 years.

A new study published in the September 2014 volume of the Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology reveals a significant correlation between autism disorder (AD) and MMR, Varicella (chickenpox) and Hepatitis-A vaccines.

And the "study" in question conflates correlation with causation. They say vaccines of this type were introduced in the 1980s and wow autism diagnoses were increasing then too! How many other things were happening in the 1980s too? Lots! Did any of them cause the increase in autism? Hard to say, but studies of kids receiving and not receiving vaccines have consistently failed to demonstrate a link between vaccines and autism.

It's like saying the loss of pirates has caused global temperature to increase.

320px-PiratesVsTemp%28en%29.svg.png


People tend to associate vaccines with autism because symptoms become more noticeable around 18 months of age, which is when the vaccines are given.

Here's a more detailed tearing apart of the study in question.
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
The journal involved is also a rather odd one, in which authors have to pay hundreds of dollars to the publisher to have their "research" published.
 
It's all about dollars and cents. Why the need to use aborted babies? Is it to further deflate the value of human life? Why are Liberals so dead-set in killing off future generations? Is this a form of population control or is it racial, like Planned Parenthood intended from the beginning?
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
Guess how all this got started.

A now-retracted British study that linked autism to childhood vaccines was an "elaborate fraud" that has done long-lasting damage to public health, a leading medical publication reported Wednesday.

An investigation published by the British medical journal BMJ concludes the study's author, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, misrepresented or altered the medical histories of all 12 of the patients whose cases formed the basis of the 1998 study -- and that there was "no doubt" Wakefield was responsible.

"It's one thing to have a bad study, a study full of error, and for the authors then to admit that they made errors," Fiona Godlee, BMJ's editor-in-chief, told CNN. "But in this case, we have a very different picture of what seems to be a deliberate attempt to create an impression that there was a link by falsifying the data."

Britain stripped Wakefield of his medical license in May. "Meanwhile, the damage to public health continues, fueled by unbalanced media reporting and an ineffective response from government, researchers, journals and the medical profession," BMJ states in an editorial accompanying the work...Wakefield has been unable to reproduce his results in the face of criticism, and other researchers have been unable to match them. Most of his co-authors withdrew their names from the study in 2004 after learning he had had been paid by a law firm that intended to sue vaccine manufacturers -- a serious conflict of interest he failed to disclose. After years on controversy, the Lancet, the prestigious journal that originally published the research, retracted Wakefield's paper last February.

The series of articles launched Wednesday are investigative journalism, not results of a clinical study. The writer, Brian Deer, said Wakefield "chiseled" the data before him, "falsifying medical histories of children and essentially concocting a picture, which was the picture he was contracted to find by lawyers hoping to sue vaccine manufacturers and to create a vaccine scare."... According to BMJ, Wakefield received more than 435,000 pounds ($674,000) from the lawyers. Godlee said the study shows that of the 12 cases Wakefield examined in his paper, five showed developmental problems before receiving the MMR vaccine and three never had autism.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/01/05/autism.vaccines/

As usual, it was about the money. Not that people who like to concoct conspiracy stories will be swayed by the facts, but there they are.
 
A new study has been released that shows that increases in autism rates are linked to the introduction of vaccines manufactured using human fetal cell lines from aborted babies. While this has been theorized in the past, this connection has now been analyzed using worldwide data. Researchers have identified three specific change points in which the incidence of autism rose significantly in the U.S., as well as points in other countries. Each of these points corresponds to the times that a vaccine containing DNA from aborted babies was added to the recommended vaccine schedule.

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/1579092/st...ines-from-aborted-babies/#yCvh1beH36zQc4aG.99

It is right there but The Barbarian and his ilk cannot handle the truth.
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
A new study has been released that shows that increases in autism rates are linked to the introduction of vaccines manufactured using human fetal cell lines from aborted babies. While this has been theorized in the past,

"Theorized" is the wrong word:
The series of articles launched Wednesday are investigative journalism, not results of a clinical study. The writer, Brian Deer, said Wakefield "chiseled" the data before him, "falsifying medical histories of children and essentially concocting a picture, which was the picture he was contracted to find by lawyers hoping to sue vaccine manufacturers and to create a vaccine scare."... According to BMJ, Wakefield received more than 435,000 pounds ($674,000) from the lawyers. Godlee said the study shows that of the 12 cases Wakefield examined in his paper, five showed developmental problems before receiving the MMR vaccine and three never had autism.

http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/01/05/autism.vaccines/

this connection has now been analyzed using worldwide data.

Well, let's take a look...

The report was published in the "Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology" by some folks from the "Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute."

Here's a little information about the publisher:

We recently learned of the launch of one of the largest scholarly open-access publishers. It’s called Academic and Scientific Publishing, and it launched with an amazing 355 journal titles.

None of the journals has any content, nor does any have an editorial board as far as we can tell. This publisher is only now beginning to spam researchers soliciting manuscripts and editorial board memberships. Each journal’s home page has several links, including links to the editorial board, the publication fee, and the like, but they are all blank.

The publisher does not state what its author fees will be. It appears to be run by Bangladeshis based in New York and Connecticut. The IP domain-name registration provides the following information:

Mohammad Rashid
mamun_sarker2002@yahoo.com
(203) 253-8235
Publishing Company
1429 35th Street Apt 1A
Brooklyn, NY 11218

We think that Mr. Rashid sometimes also uses his fuller name: Mohammad Mamun-or-Rashid. He appears to be associated with the Dhaka-based company Noorzahan Kamal Web Technology. We wonder how anyone could manage 355 scholarly journals from apartment 1A in Brooklyn.

http://scholarlyoa.com/2013/01/15/open-access-publisher-launches-with-355-new-journals/

Researchers have identified three specific change points in which the incidence of autism rose significantly in the U.S., as well as points in other countries. Each of these points corresponds to the times that a vaccine containing DNA from aborted babies was added to the recommended vaccine schedule.

Read more at http://www.inquisitr.com/1579092/stu...beH36zQc4aG.99

Yes, read that, and then read this, about the actual study.


There is another group that has been around for a while but about which I have not written before – some elements of the right-to-life group. What is their connection to vaccines? – the false belief that vaccines contain cells from aborted fetuses. Recently Lifenews published an article with the following headline: Study Suggests Link Between Autism and Use of Cells From Abortions in Vaccines. The study, of course, does nothing of the sort.

The EPA Study

LifeNews editor, Steven Ertelt, was referring to a recent EPA study published in Environmental Science Technology called Timing of Increased Autistic Disorder Cumulative Incidence. If you read the paper you will find no mention of vaccines, let alone fetal cells in vaccines. The study simply looked at databases of autism diagnosis to see if there was a point at which the increasing cumulative diagnoses was most sharp – any turning points in the data. The point of this exercise is to suggest where to look for a potential environment factor contributing to autism – because that’s what the EPA does, look for environmental exposures that are causing human disease.

They found that in the California, Danish, and worldwide datasets the turning point happened around 1988-1989, while in the Japanese dataset the turning point was spread out more from 1988-1996. Therefore, they conclude, if we want to look for an environmental factor we should look for things whose exposure began around 1988-1989. That is the extent of their conclusion – nothing about vaccines or abortions.

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-other-anti-vaccinationists/

It is right there but The Barbarian and his ilk cannot handle the truth.

Someone can't. Understand something; abortion is killing a living human being. It's a horrific thing, the more so because the law sanctions it. It's an affront to God. But lying about things does not serve the cause of pro-life. It makes it harder to convince reasonable people that we are right.

For God's sake, for the sake of the unborn, don't help them do this any more.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top