So if I say, "This statement is true," there are circumstances where that statement would not be true?None that we're privy to.
So if I say, "This statement is true," there are circumstances where that statement would not be true?None that we're privy to.
Are you absolutely sure?None that we're privy to.
So if I say, "This statement is true," there are circumstances where that statement would not be true?
Are you absolutely sure?
Which has nothing to do with whether the statement "This statement is true" is true or false.Yes. You could be a liar.
So it's absolutely true that you are not wrong that there are no absolute truths?Experientially speaking..yes.
Which has nothing to do with whether the statement "This statement is true" is true or false.
So again I ask, is the phrase "This statement is true," ever wrong?So it's absolutely true that you are not wrong that there are no absolute truths?
You just contradicted yourself.
Why should I trust you, when you can't even make a consistent logical argument?
And you are not logical.Because mankind must work within the limitations of reason and logic. Beyond that requires faith.
No.And you are not logical.
Faith isn't illogical.
You haven't answered my question:
Is "This statement is true" ever false?
Telling.
Obfuscation.Justice in the absolute is an illusion.
Twisting my question isn't gonna fly with me.If you understand the limits of knowledge you'd realize that your statement "is this statement true[?]" is tautological. It can be neither true nor false without further info. In effect you're stating "is this (true) statement true?" Mere circular rhetoric. :idunno:
One man's obfuscation is another man's embracement of ignorance.Obfuscation.
Twisting my question isn't gonna fly with me.
I asked "Is 'this statement is true' ever false?".
Could you please answer "yes" or "no". And if "yes", please provide a scenario where that statement (not question) is false.
So then that statement would be an absolute, no?No it can never be false...because "This (true) statement is true."is a useless tautology.
And yet we could look at what each side has to say and determine which is more compelling.One man's obfuscation is another man's embracement of ignorance.
So then that statement would be an absolute, no?
If emotionalism is your standard...then you've made a compelling case!And yet we could look at what each side has to say and determine which is more compelling.
Now THAT was compelling.For instance, in this case I asked a simple question that should always be answered with a "yes,"
One man's obfuscation is another man's embracement of ignorance.
Justice is good. Get over it. :up:If emotionalism is your standard...then you've made a compelling case!Now THAT was compelling.darwinsm:
Justice is good. Get over it. :up:
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Is it ever just to kill an innocent person,Keep to that good attitude even in spite of ever running afoul of it. :up: