Another Supreme Injustice

[Doom]

This 17 year old girl can murder her child if she chooses, but not choose how she will treat her own disease.

HARTFORD, Conn. — The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled Thursday that state officials aren't violating the rights of a 17-year-old girl by forcing her to undergo cancer chemotherapy she doesn't want.

Child welfare agency officials defended their treatment of Cassandra, saying they have a responsibility to protect the girl's life.

Story

 

[Nick M]

Liberal hypocrites? No way. On the other hand, subjecting one to heavy doses of radiation can kill, so that is inline with killing a baby.

 

[elohiym]

This 17 year old girl can murder her child if she chooses, but not choose how she will treat her own disease.

It should be the other way around.

 

[shagster01]

This 17 year old girl can murder her child if she chooses, but not choose how she will treat her own disease.

HARTFORD, Conn. — The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled Thursday that state officials aren't violating the rights of a 17-year-old girl by forcing her to undergo cancer chemotherapy she doesn't want.

Child welfare agency officials defended their treatment of Cassandra, saying they have a responsibility to protect the girl's life.

Story

I agree with you on this. It is wrong to force specific medical treatment. They should be allowed to try whatever treatment they desire.