“Climate change” is a LIE… Ask… HELLLLO!!!... SCIENTISTS (of all people)!

[GuySmiley]

Once again I will only comment with, "How is a cleaner environment a bad thing"? Even IF climate change isn't a real thing, how is treating our only home better a bad thing? Not once has a climate change denier been able to answer that question.

Because the only solution offered is global socialism.
Because starving people need to use modern farming techniques, not have their hands tied behind their backs.
Because industry lifts people out of poverty and we don't need industry gimped for fake political reasons.

 

[brewmama]

Why is the air in Beijing opaque?

Well, it certainly isn't CO2. Didn't you know that?

 

[brewmama]

Once again I will only comment with, "How is a cleaner environment a bad thing"? Even IF climate change isn't a real thing, how is treating our only home better a bad thing? Not once has a climate change denier been able to answer that question.

Irrelevant, as most cagwista arguments are, since CO2 is NOT a pollutant.

 

[brewmama]

Brew: Wow 97 articles. 4 appear to come from journals, the rest from newspapers (and we know how accurate and unbiased those are), other media outlets and comments from deniers funded by Big Oil etc.

But that's OK you are likely to be dead before climate change effects your grandchildren. Not a big deal.

That's more journal articles than you have claiming the 97% is true. Yet you believe it. And of course your answer gives you an easy out so you can ignore all the proof that cagwistas lie. And there's a LOT of proof.

 

[exminister]

Well, it certainly isn't only CO2. Didn't you know that?

FTFY

http://sites.dartmouth.edu/anth491/causes/

 

[badp]

Bill Nye sez climate warming is real, and he's not a scientist. But he wears a bow tie and says "science is kewl" so he must be right.

 

[exminister]

Irrelevant, as most cagwista arguments are, since CO2 is NOT a pollutant.

Then are you able to close yourself in your garage, start your car and breath deeply because it is not a pollutant?

I remember in the 70s crossing the Woodrow Wilson bridge and not being able to see the Washington monument. Then oddly after the clean air act and a few years later I could see it. Is correlation causation here or do you have a better explanation?



Here's a link

http://www.ivhhn.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=84#Exposure Effects

 

[exminister]

FTFY

http://sites.dartmouth.edu/anth491/causes/

http://www.ivhhn.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=84#Exposure Effects

 

[ok doser]

Then are you able to close yourself in your garage, start your car and breath deeply because it is not a pollutant?

is water a pollutant?

 

[brewmama]

Then are you able to close yourself in your garage, start your car and breath deeply because it is not a pollutant?

I remember in the 70s crossing the Woodrow Wilson bridge and not being able to see the Washington monument. Then oddly after the clean air act and a few years later I could see it. Is correlation causation here or do you have a better explanation?



Here's a link

http://www.ivhhn.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=84#Exposure Effects

Do you really not know the difference between CO2 and CO? Another example of the cagwista "knowledge". Typical.

Again, CO2 is invisible, odorless, not a pollutant and not dangerous, unless you stop breathing and cannot breathe it out of your body. We exhale it with every breath.

 

[brewmama]

FTFY

http://sites.dartmouth.edu/anth491/causes/

http://www.ivhhn.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=84#Exposure Effects

No CO2 anywhere on that graph. Why do you keep throwing up straw men?

 

[exminister]

is water a pollutant?

In Water World yes

 

[exminister]

No CO2 anywhere on that graph. Why do you keep throwing up straw men?

You brought up CO not me.

I am for clean air and water not your red herring

 

[republicanchick]

Ah, chick, you continue to quote mine dead guys.

But why pick someone who claims as he did? Why not pay attention to the vast majority of scientists who found otherwise? I'm sure you have no agenda.

Ah, jonahdog, you continue to quote mine dead guys.

But why pick someone who claims as he did? Why not pay attention to the vast majority of scientists who found otherwise? I'm sure you have no agenda.

 

[republicanchick]

Hello? Republicans? .[/url]

]

Hello? Democrats/liberals?

you are the only ones who deny reality on a continuing basis




___

 

[republicanchick]

That is to say- from the time the alarm went off to now, there has been virtually nothing to suffice it's claim. It's nothing more than a money rake, and scientists are funded by governments to justify getting money from industries.
.

there... fixed it 4 ya






+

 

[gcthomas]

There's nothing more hilarious than a ship going to study global warming getting stuck in an oceanic field of ice.

Yup - the Arctic ice extent was much greater in 2013 than 2012, as can be seen in this graph. Just look at the last two points!

 

[republicanchick]

Yup - the Arctic ice extent was much greater in 2013 than 2012, as can be seen in this graph. Just look at the last two points!


[/IMG]

but don't you get it?

(say the libs)

no matter WHAT happens in the climate.. in the world weatherwise..

it is "climate change"

more super cells?

climate change

more hurricanes?

climate change

more ice caps?

climate change

less ice caps?

climate change


see how it works?

we (say the libs) win no matter what

That's how (say the libs) we operate....


we are liars... dontcha get it?



+++

 

[brewmama]

You brought up CO not me.

I am for clean air and water not your red herring

You don't even know what you are posting?!

You're the one who brought up dying in a garage by leaving the car running. That's CO.

Clean air and water have nothing to do with "climate change". And you think I'm the one with a red herring?? Why are you even in this thread? You are so off topic it makes one's head spin.

 

[exminister]

brew mama
You didn't answer garage question or how DC reduced it's smog visibly in the 70s.

Then are you able to close yourself in your garage, start your car and breath deeply because it is not a pollutant?

I remember in the 70s crossing the Woodrow Wilson bridge and not being able to see the Washington monument. Then oddly after the clean air act and a few years later I could see it. Is correlation causation here or do you have a better explanation?